Advertisement

WH: The Conceptual Model for Services

  • Ajantha DahanayakeEmail author
  • Bernhard Thalheim
Part of the Texts & Monographs in Symbolic Computation book series (TEXTSMONOGR)

Abstract

Services as an emerging paradigm in modern information technology (IT) infrastructures underwent the first hype for service-oriented computing caused by Web services and the second hype by IT market pressures on large corporations (e.g. SAP), leading to standardisations incorporating logical-level specifications leaving much of the low-level details unaccounted for.The conception of a service needs a conceptual reflection. However, the service notation lacks a conceptual model. This gap is caused by the variety of aspects that must be reflected, such as the handling of the services as a collection of offerings, a proper annotation facility beyond ontologies, a tool to describe the service concept and the specification of the added value of a business user. Those requirements must be handled at the same time. Therefore, this chapter contributes to the development of a conceptual model of a service through a specification framework WH and through an embedding framework to the concept-content-annotation triptych and Hermagoras of Temnos inquiry frames.

Keywords

Service System Service Model Service Description Service Innovation Service Concept 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Amarakoon, S., Dahanayake, A., Thalheim, B.: A framework for modelling medical diagnosis and decision support services. Int. J. Digit. Inf. Wirel. Commun. 2(4), 7–26 (2012)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Amarakoon, S., Dahanayake, A., Thalheim, B.: Domain requirements modeling framework for cross-disciplinary healthcare service systems development. Int. J. Healthcare Syst. Palgrave Macmillan (The OR society). 2012, accepted for publication: ICCNDT, 152–166, Gulf University, Bahrain.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Arsanjani, A., Ghosh, S., Allam, A., Abdollah, T., Ganapathy, S., Holley, K.: SOMA: a method for developing service-oriented solutions. IBM Syst. J. 47(3), 377–396 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bergholtz, M., Andersson, B., Johannesson, P.: Abstraction, restriction, and co-creation: three perspectives on services. In: ER 2010 Workshops of Conceptual Modeling of Services. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 6413, pp. 107–116. Springer, Berlin (2010)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dahanayake, A.: CAME: an environment for flexible information modeling. Ph.D. dissertation, Delft University of Technology (1997)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dahanayake, A., Thalheim, B.: Conceptual model for IT service systems. J. Univers. Comput. Sci. 18(17), 2452–2473 (2012)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Erl, T.: SOA: Principles of Service Design. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (2007)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fensel, D., Bussler, C.: The web service modeling framework WSMF. Electron. Commer. Res. Appl. 1(2), 113–137 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Glushko, R.J.: Seven contexts for service system design. In: Maglio, P.P., et al. (eds.) Handbook of Service Science, Service Science: Research and Innovations in the Service Economy. Springer, New York (2010). doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-1628-0_11Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Goldstein, S.M., Johnston, R., Duffy, J.-A., Rao, J.: The service concept: the missing link in service design research? J. Oper. Manag. 20, 212–134 (2002)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Halloun, I.A.: Modeling Theory in Science Education. Springer, Berlin (2006)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hirschheim, R., Welke, R.J., Schwarz, A.: Service oriented architecture: myths, realities, and a maturity model. MIS Q. Exec. 9(1), 204–214 (2010)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hurby, P.: Model-Driven Design of Software Applications with Business Patterns. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    IBM Research: Service Science: A New Academic Discipline? IBM Press, New York (2004)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ion, A.L., Udristoiu, S.: Automation of the medical diagnosis process using semantic image interpretation. In: Proceedings of ADBIS 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 6295, pp. 234–246. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    ISO/IEC: Information technology - process assessment - part 2: Performing an assessment. Publicly available, IS 15504-2:2003 (2003)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Maglio, P., Srinivasan, S., Kreulen, J., Spohrer, J.: Service systems, service scientists, SSME, and innovation. Commun. ACM 49(7), 81–85 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    McCarthy, W.E.: The REA accounting model: a generalized framework for accounting systems in a shared data environment. Account. Rev. 57, 554–578 (1982)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    OASIS: Reference Model for Service Oriented Architecture 1.0. http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/19679/ (2006)
  20. 20.
    Papazoglou, M.P., van den Heuvel, W.-J.: Service-oriented design and development methodology. Int. J. Web Eng. Technol. 2(4), 412–442 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Poels, G.: The resource-service-system model for service science. In: ER2010 Workshops. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 6413, pp. 117–126. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Preist, C.: A conceptual architecture for semantic web services. In: Mcllraith, S.A., Plexousakis, D., van Harmelen, F. (eds.) ISWS 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 3298, pp. 395–409. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Schewe, K.-D., Thalheim, B.: Development of collaboration frameworks for distributed web information systems. In: Proceedings of IJCAI’07-EMC, pp. 27–32 (2007)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Schewe, K.-D., Thalheim, B.: About semantics. In: 4th International Workshop, Semantics in Data and Knowledge bases 2010, Revised Selected Papers. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 6834, pp. 1–22. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Shortliffe, T.: Medical Thinking Meeting, London. Retrieved from http://www.openclinical.org/dss.html (June 2006)
  26. 26.
    Sol, H.G.: Shifting boundaries in systems engineering. In: Proceedings of the Second Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (PACIS), Singapore, 29 June–2 July, 1995, p. 26Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Spohrer, J., Maglio, P.P., Bailey, J., Gruhl, D.: Steps towards a science of service systems. IEEE Comput. 40, 71–77 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Stojanovic, Z., Dahanayake, A.: Service - Oriented Software Systems Engineering: Challenges and Practices. Idea Group Publishing, HersheyGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Thalheim, B.: Towards a theory of conceptual modelling. J. Univers. Comput. Sci. 16(20), 3102–3137 (2010)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Thalheim, B.: The theory of conceptual models, the theory of conceptual modelling and foundations of conceptual modelling. In: The Handbook of Conceptual Modeling: Its Usage and Its Challenges, Chap. 17, pp. 547–580. Springer, Berlin (2011)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Thalheim, B.: The science of conceptual modelling. In: DEXA (1). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 6860, pp. 12–26. Springer, Berlin (2011)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Thalheim, B.: The conceptual model \(\equiv\) an adequate and dependable artifact enhanced by concepts. In: Information Modelling and Knowledge Bases, vol. 25, pp. 241–254. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2014)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Topcon: IMAGEnet i-base. http://www.topcon-medical.eu/eu/producten/75-imagenet-i-base.html. Accessed December 2014
  34. 34.
    Vargo, S.L., Lusch, R.F.: Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. J. Mark. 68, 1–17 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Vargo, S.L., Maglio, P.P., Akaka, M.A.: On value and value co-creation: a service systems and service logic perspective. Eur. Manag. J. 26, 145–152 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    W3C Working Group: Web Service Modeling Language, Version 1.1. http://www.w3.org/TR/sml/, W3C Recommendation 12 May 2009
  37. 37.
    Zachman, J.A.: A framework for information systems architecture. IBM Syst. J. 26(3), 276–292 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Computer Information SciencePrince Sultan UniversityRiyadhKingdom of Saudi Arabia
  2. 2.Department of Computer ScienceChristian Albrechts University KielKielGermany

Personalised recommendations