Abstract
For decades, neuroscientists have been carrying out studies using animal models. Clinical professionals do not use the data originated from these studies because the interpretation of these studies may be a hard task for them. How data generated in studies with animals lead to practical use in psychological and psychiatric clinics is a common question in courses and meetings in this area of science. There are two typical mistakes often occurring in daily practice, namely, the transposition of data directly from laboratories to clinics or simply ignoring such data. In the first intance, the characteristics of species and the limits of these studies are ignored by therapists; in the second, the professionals do not read the studies because the issues are not familiar to them. We believe that this problem occurs because the concept of an animal model is not clear to many therapists. In this chapter we will discuss the concept of behavioral animal models, its limitations and possibilities of simulating a mental pathology; we show the differences between the use of animal models in behavioral sciences and in others fields of research in biomedical sciences; we discuss the criteria and processes of validation of an animal model; and finally, we give some advice to clinical professionals on the reading of animal models in the literature.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Japiassú H, Marcondes D. Dicionário básico de. Filosofia. Rio de Janeiro: Jorge Zahar Editor; 1989.
Wilnner P, editor. Behavioral models in psychopharmachology: theoretical, industrial and clinical perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1991.
Gouveia Jr A. Modelos animais em psicopatologia: breves notas introdutórias. Estud Psicol. 1999;16(1):13–6.
Graeff FG. Psicobiologia da ansiedade. Jornal Brasileiro de Psiquiatria. 1983;32(6):345–50.
Associação Americana de Psiquiatria. Manual de estatística e diagnostico de transtornos mentais. Porto Alegre: Artmed; 2004.
Stein DJ, Phillips KA, Bolton D, Fulford KW, Sadler JZ, Kendler KS. What is a mental/psychiatric disorder? From DSM-IV to DSM-V. Psychol Med. 2010;40(11):1759–65. doi:10.1017/S0033291709992261.
McKinney WT. Biobehavioral models of depression in monkeys. In: Usdin E, Hanin I, editors. Animal models in psychiatry and neurology. Oxford: Pergamon Press; 1977.
Gilbert P. Evolutionary approaches to psychopathology: the role of natural defences. Aust NZ J Psychiatry. 2001;35(1):17–27.
Hinde RA. The use of differences and similarities in comparative psychopathology. In: Serban G, Kling A, editors. Animal models in human psychobiology. New York: Plenum Press; 1976.
Maximino C, Brito TM, Gouveia Jr A. Construct validity of behavioral models of anxiety: where experimental psychopathology meets ecology and evolution. Psychol Neurosci. 2010;3:117–23.
Silva MTA, Guerra LG, Alves CRR. Modelos comportamentais em neurociências. Revista Brasileira de Análise do Comportamento. 2005;1(2):167–85.
Hartung T. Thoughts on limitation of animal models. Parkinson Relat Disord. 2008;14:81–3.
Worp HB, Howell DW, Sena ES, Porritt MJ, Rewell S, O’Collins V, MacLeod R. Can animal models of disease reliable inform human studies? PLoS Med. 2010;7(3):e1000245.
Jucker M. The benefits and limitations of animal models for translational research in neurodegenerative diseases. Nat Med. 2010;16(11):1210–4.
Slattery DA, Cryan JF. Using the rat forced swim test to assess antidepressant-like activity in rodents. Nat Protoc. 2012;7:1009–14.
Cryan JF, Mombereau C, Vassout A. The tail suspension test as a model for assessing antidepressant activity: review of pharmacological and genetic studies in mice. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2005;29(4–5):571–625.
Pellow S, Chopin P, File SE, Briley M. Validation of open:closed arm entries in an elevated plus-maze as a measure of anxiety in the rat. J Neurosci Methods. 1985;14(3):149–67.
Parr LA, Waller BM. Understanding chimpanzee facial expression: insights into the evolution of communication. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2006;1(3):221–8.
File SE, Zangrossi Jr H, Viana MB, Graeff FG. Trial 2 in the elevated plus-maze a different form of fear. Psychopharmacology. 1993;111:491–4.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gouveia, A., de Brito, T.M. (2015). Animal Models of Psychopathology and Its Relation to Clinical Practice. In: Gargiulo, P., Arroyo, H. (eds) Psychiatry and Neuroscience Update. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17103-6_22
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17103-6_22
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-17102-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-17103-6
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)