Abstract
The common octopus (Octopus vulgaris) fishery is of substantial importance in southern Europe. This is the case in Portugal where the octopus fishery has considerable social and economic value, with small-scale fishing being increasingly economically dependent on this resource. The octopus fishery in the European Union is excluded from quota regulations under the Common Fisheries Policy, and hence Portugal is responsible for managing its own fishery. This chapter describes the current status of the small-scale octopus fishery in Portugal, its governing system, challenges faced by the fishery and implications of these challenges for the governability of the fishery. The Portuguese octopus fishery faces several challenges including those inherent to the biological features of the species and its sensitivity to environmental influences. Limited understanding about the resource has led to inappropriate monitoring and assessment, and a lack of intervention by authorities in the management of octopus. Although formal participation of fishers in the decision-making process for octopus management is a recent phenomenon, the management measures implemented over the years were the result of pressure from fishers worried about decreasing economic returns. However, poor organization, lack of trust and little cooperation between fishers results in them having little influence in the decision-making process. Several recent developments aimed at improving the governance framework and increasing the profitability of the octopus fishery, however, have the potential to improve the current management system and increase sustainability.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Alford, R. A., & Jackson, G. D. (1993). Do cephalopods and larvae of other taxa growth asymptotically? American Naturalist, 141, 717–728.
Aristegui, J., Barton, E. D., Álvarez-Salgado, X. A., Santos, A. M. P., Figueiras, F. G., Kifani, S., Hernández-Leon, S., Mason, E., Machú, E., & Demarcq, H. (2009). Sub-regional ecosystem variability in the Canary Current upwelling. Progress in Oceanography, 83, 33–48.
Baeta, F., Pinheiro, A., Corte-Real, M., Costa, J. L., de Almeida, P. R., Cabral, H., & Costa, M. J. (2005). Are the fisheries in the Tagus estuary sustainable? Fisheries Research, 76, 243–251.
Bavinck, M., Chuenpagdee, R., Jentoft, S., & Kooiman, J. (Eds.). (2013). Governability of fisheries and aquaculture: Theory and applications (MARE publication series, Vol. 7). Dordrecht: Springer.
Berghofer, A., Wittmer, H., & Rauschmayer, F. (2008). Stakeholder participation in ecosystem-based approaches to fisheries management: A synthesis from European research projects. Marine Policy, 32(2), 243–253.
Bode, A., Álvarez-Ossorio, M. T., Carrera, P., & Lorenzo, J. (2004). Reconstruction of trophic pathways between plankton and the north Iberian Sardine (Sardina pilchardus) using stable isotopes. Scientia Marina, 68(1), 168–178.
Coffey, C. (2005). What role for public participation in fisheries governance? In T. S. Gray (Ed.), Participation in fisheries governance. Reviews: Methods and technologies in fish biology and fisheries (pp. 27–44). Dordrecht: Springer.
Domain, F., Jouffre, D., & Caveriviére, A. (2000). Growth of Octopus vulgaris from tagging in Senegalese waters. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 80, 699–705.
EC. (2014). Facts and figures on the common fisheries policy: Basic statistical data (2014th ed., 44p). Luxembourg: European Commission.
Erzini, K. (2005). Trends in NE Atlantic landings (southern Portugal): Identifying the relative importance of fisheries and environmental variables. Fisheries Oceanography, 14, 195–209.
Fluvia, M., Garriga, A., Rigall, R., Rodríguez-Carámbula, E., & Saló, S. (2012). Buyer and seller behavior in fish markets organized as Dutch auctions: Evidence from a wholesale fish market in Southern Europe. Fisheries Research, 127–128, 18–25.
Gelcich, S., Fernández, M., Godoy, N., Canepa, A., Prado, L., & Castilla, J. C. (2012). Territorial user rights for fisheries as ancillary instruments for marine coastal conservation in Chile. Conservation Biology, 26(6), 1005–1015.
Godinho, V. M. (1963). Os descobrimentos e a economia mundial (Vol. 2). Lisboa: Editora Arcádia.
Gras, M., Roel, B. A., Coppin, F., Foucher, E., & Robin, J. P. (2014). A two-stage biomass model to assess the English Channel cuttlefish (Sepia officinalis L.) stock. ICES Journal of Marine Science. doi:10.1093/icesjms/fsu081.
ICES. (2013, October 8–9). Report of the workshop on the necessity for Crangon and Cephalopod management (WKCCM), Copenhagen, Denmark. ICES CM 2013/ACOM:82. Copenhagen: International Council for the Exploration of the Sea.
ICES. (2014, June 16–19). Report of the working group on Cephalopod fisheries and life history (WGCEPH), Lisbon, Portugal (in press).
INE. (2014). Estatistica da Pesca 2013 [Fisheries statistics 2013]. Lisboa: Instituto Nacional de Estatistica.
Jentoft, S., & McCay, B. (1995). User participation in fisheries management: Lessons drawn from international experiences. Marine Policy, 19(3), 227–246.
Kooiman, J., Bavinck, M., Jentoft, S., & Pullin, R. (Eds.). (2005). Fish for life: Interactive governance for fisheries. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Kooiman, J., Bavinck, M., Chuenpagdee, R., Mahon, R., & Pullin, R. (2008). Interactive governance and governability: An introduction. The Journal of Transdisciplinary Environmental Studies, 7(1), 1–11.
Lefkaditou, E., Kavadas, S., & Papaconstantinou, C. (2002). Cephalopod fisheries statistics in Greek waters (NE Mediterranean). ICES Living Resources Committee, ICES CM 1999/G: 4, Working group on Cephalopod fisheries and life history, Lisbon, Portugal, 4–6 December 2002. Copenhagen: International Council for the Exploration of the Sea.
Marshall, N. A. (2007). Can policy perception influence social resilience to policy change? Fisheries Research, 86(2–3), 216–227.
Martín, G., Parma, A., & Orensanz, J. (2010). The Chilean experience with territorial use rights in fisheries. In R. Q. Grafton, R. Hilborn, D. Squires, M. Tait, & M. Williams (Eds.), Handbook of marine fisheries conservation and management (pp. 324–337). Oxford: University Press.
Moreno, A., Lourenço, S., Pereira, J., Gaspar, M., Cabral, H., Pierce, G., & Santos, A. (2014). Essential habitats for pre-recruit Octopus vulgaris along the Portuguese coast. Fisheries Research, 152, 74–85.
Otero, J., Álvarez-Salgado, X., González, A., Mirand, A., Groom, S., Cabanas, J., Casas, G., Wheatley, B., & Guerra, A. (2008). Bottom-up control of common octopus (Octopus vulgaris) in the Galician upwelling system, northeast Atlantic Ocean. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 362, 181–192.
Perales-Raya, C., Jurado-Ruzafa, A., Bartolomé, A., Duque, V., Carrasco, M. N., & Fraile-Nuez, E. (2014). Age of spent Octopus vulgaris and stress mark analysis using beaks of wild individuals. Hydrobiologia, 725, 105–114.
Pereira, J. (1999). Control of the Portuguese artisanal octopus fishery. In C. Nolan (Ed.), Proceedings of the international conference on integrated fisheries monitoring (pp. 369–378). Rome: FAO.
Pereira, J., Cunha, M. M., & Moreno, A. (1995). Os cefalópodes e o seu habitat: substratos preferenciais. In J. M. G. Matoso (Ed.), 8° Congresso do Algarve (pp. 829–837). Vilamoura.
Pierce, G. J., Allcock, L., Bruno, I., Bustamante, P., Gonzále, Á., Guerra, Á., Jereb, P., Lefkaditou, E., Malham, S., Moreno, A., Pereira, J., Piatkowski, U., Rasero, M., Sánchez, P., Santos, M. B., Santurtún, M., Seixas, S., Sobrino, I., & Villanueva, R. (Eds.). (2010). Cephalopod biology and fisheries in Europe (ICES cooperative research report no. 303). Copenhagen: International Council for the Exploration of the Sea.
Pilar-Fonseca, T., Campos, A., Pereira, J., Moreno, A., Lourenço, S., & Afonso-Dias, M. (2014). Integration of fishery-dependent data sources in support of octopus spatial management. Marine Policy, 45, 69–75.
Pita, C., Pierce, G. J., & Theodossiou, I. (2010). Stakeholders’ participation in the fisheries management decision-making process: Fishers’ perceptions of participation. Marine Policy, 34, 1093–1102.
Pita, C., Chuenpagdee, R., & Pierce, G. J. (2012). Participatory issues in fisheries governance in Europe. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 23(4), 336–347.
Raberinary, D., & Benbow, S. (2012). The reproductive cycle of Octopus cyanea in southwest Madagascar and implications for fisheries management. Fisheries Research, 125–126, 190–197.
Sobrino, I., Silva, L., Bellido, J. M., & Ramos, F. (2002). Rainfall, river discharge and sea temperature as factors affecting abundance of two coastal benthic cephalopod species in the Gulf of Cadiz (SW Spain). Bulletin of Marine Science, 71(2), 851–865.
Sobrino, I., Juarez, A., Rey, J., Romero, Z., & Baro, J. (2011). Description of the clay pot fishery in the Gulf of Cadiz (SW Spain) for Octopus vulgaris: Selectivity and exploitation pattern. Fisheries Research, 108, 283–290.
Sonderblohm, C., Pereira, J., & Erzini, K. (2014). Environmental and fishery-driven dynamics of the common octopus (Octopus vulgaris) based on time-series analyses from leeward Algarve, southern Portugal. ICES Journal of Marine Science. doi:10.1093/icesjms/fst189.
Sousa, P., Azevedo, M., & Gomes, M. C. (2005). Demersal assemblages off Portugal: Mapping, seasonal, and temporal patterns. Fisheries Research, 75, 120–137.
Tsangridis, A., Sánchez, P., & Ioannidou, D. (2002). Exploitation patterns of Octopus vulgaris in two Mediterranean areas. Scientia Marina, 66(1), 59–68.
Villanueva, R., & Norman, M. D. (2008). Biology of the planktonic stages of benthic octopuses. Oceanography and Marine Biology – An Annual Review, 46, 105–202.
Acknowledgements
CP was supported by the “Cátedra do Mar” UA-CGD grant “Sustainability of small-scale fisheries: Alternative approaches to fisheries management and governance”. SL was supported by a grant under the GesPe project (PROMAR -31-03-01-FEP-0017). GJP thanks Caixa Geral de Depósitos (Portugal) and the University of Aveiro for financial support. The fishery statistics reported here are from the INE and DGPA official statistics. Part of the information used in this book chapter resulted from interviews carried out as part of the “Cátedra do Mar” grant. The authors also wish to thank all the representatives from Fishermen’s Associations, Producers’ Organizations and companies trading in fishery products who took part in the survey.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pita, C., Pereira, J., Lourenço, S., Sonderblohm, C., Pierce, G.J. (2015). The Traditional Small-Scale Octopus Fishery in Portugal: Framing Its Governability. In: Jentoft, S., Chuenpagdee, R. (eds) Interactive Governance for Small-Scale Fisheries. MARE Publication Series, vol 13. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17034-3_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17034-3_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-17033-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-17034-3
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)