Skip to main content

The Governability of Mangrove Ecosystems in Thailand: Comparative Successes of Different Governance Models

  • Chapter
Interactive Governance for Small-Scale Fisheries

Part of the book series: MARE Publication Series ((MARE,volume 13))

Abstract

The continuing loss of coastal-marine biodiversity and the over-exploitation of coastal fisheries in many parts of the world fuel debates about what governance arrangements can turn the tide on these declines. Using the governability framework, this chapter investigates the comparative strengths and weaknesses of self-governance and co-governance arrangements, by interrogating six case studies from a mangrove region in Thailand. Our examination of three successful and three unsuccessful case studies, identifies the characteristics that distinguish cases which were successfully able to continue long-term implementation of negotiated resource management arrangements: (1) trust and cooperation in governance interactions, which enables conflict resolution and informal sanctioning; and (2) stakeholders’ perceptions that the solution was fair and legitimate. Our analysis also challenges three widely accepted “good practices” for managing natural resources: the need for extensive community engagement in designing solutions; the requirement for formal recognition of community-designed solutions; and the desirability of large inputs of funding from external donors. Our data showed that whilst these three good practices are desirable, they are not necessarily required for successful initiatives. We also offer observations about the influence of diversity, complexity, dynamics, and scale on governance outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Agrawal, A., & Gibson, C. C. (1999). Enchantment and disenchantment: The role of community in natural resource conservation. World Development, 27(4), 629–649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anon. (1997). Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand 1997. Retrieved from http://www.asianlii.org/th/legis/const/1997/1.html#C001

  • Barrett, C. B., Brandon, K., Gibson, C., & Gjertsen, H. (2001). Conserving tropical biodiversity amid weak institutions. Bioscience, 51(6), 497–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, C. B., Lee, D. R., & Mcpeak, J. G. (2005). Institutional arrangements for rural poverty reduction and resource conservation. World Development, 33(2), 193–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkes, F., Hughes, T., Steneck, R. S., Wilson, J. A., Bellwood, D. R., Crona, B., & Worm, B. (2006). Globalization, roving bandits, and marine resources. Science, 311, 1557–1558.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brechin, S. R., Wilshusen, P. R., Fortwangler, C. L., & West, P. C. (Eds.). (2003). Contested nature: Promoting international biodiversity conservation with social justice in the twenty-first century. Albany: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • CBD Ad Hoc Technical Expert Group. (2005). Strategies for overcoming obstacles to implementation of integrated marine and coastal area management (IMCAM). Montreal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, R. (1983). Rural development: Putting the last first. Essex: Longman Scientific & Technical.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christie, P., & Pollnac, R. B. (2011). Socio-economy – Social dynamics of scaling-up marine protected area declaration and management. In J. Claudet (Ed.), Marine protected areas: A multidisciplinary approach (pp. 121–140). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Christie, P., & White, A. (2007). Best practices for improved governance of coral reef marine protected areas. Coral Reefs, 26, 1047–1056.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christie, P., Pollnac, R., Fluharty, D. L., Hixon, M. A., Lowry, K., Mahon, R., & Eisma-Osorio, R. L. (2009a). Tropical marine EBM feasibility: A synthesis of case studies and comparative analyses. Coastal Management, 37(3–4), 374–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christie, P., Pollnac, R., Oracion, E. G., Sabonsolin, A., Diaz, R., & Pietri, D. (2009b). Back to basics: An empirical study demonstrating the importance of local-level dynamics for the success of tropical marine ecosystem-based management. Coastal Management, 37(3–4), 349–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cicin-Sain, B., & Knecht, R. W. (1998). Integrated coastal and ocean management: Concepts and practices. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, B. R., Korompis, M. K., & Pollnac, R. B. (2006). Factors influencing progress in establishing community-based marine protected areas in Indonesia. Coastal Management, 34, 39–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferse, S. C. A., Mánez Costa, M., Schwerdtner Mánez, K., Adhuri, D. S., & Glaser, M. (2010). Allies, not aliens – Increasing the role of local communities in MPA implementation. Environmental Conservation, 37(1), 23–34. doi:10.1017/S0376892910000172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, T. S. (2005). Theorising about participatory fisheries governance. In T. S. Gray (Ed.), Participatory in fisheries governance (pp. 1–366). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Halpern, D. (2005). Social capital. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hind, E. J., Hiponia, M. C., & Gray, T. S. (2010). From community-based to centralised national management—A wrong turning for the governance of the marine protected area in Apo Island, Philippines? Marine Policy, 34(1), 54–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horwich, R. H., & Lyon, J. (2007). Community conservation: Practitioners’ answer to critics. Oryx, 41(3), 376–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, E. V. (2014). Does community management still need the State? Comparative analysis of marine protected area governance in Thailand. UK: Newcastle University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiss, A. (1999). Making community-based conservation work. Paper presented at the Society for Conservation Biology Annual Meeting, College Park, MD.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLeod, K. L., & Leslie, H. (Eds.). (2009). Ecosystem-based management for the oceans. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McShane, T. O., & Newby, S. A. (2004). Expecting the unattainable: The assumptions behind ICDPs. In T. O. McShane & M. P. Wells (Eds.), Getting biodiversity projects to work (pp. 49–76). New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • NACA. (2007). Koh Yao Noi mangrove replanting in celebration of 80th birthday of His Majesty the King of Thailand. Retrieved November 4, 2013, from http://www.enaca.org/modules/news/article.php?article_id=1692

  • Ostrom, E., Burger, J., Field, C., Norgaard, R., & Policansky, D. (1999). Revisiting the commons: Local lessons, global challenges. Science, 284(5412), 278.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, A. (2003). Turning ideas on their head: The new paradigm for protected areas. The George Wright Forum, 20(2), 8–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • PhuketTV News. (2011). Mangrove planting for our Majesty of the King of Thailand. Retrieved from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HhzclzL8LRs

  • Pollnac, R. (1998). Rapid assessment of management parameters for coral reefs. Narragansett: Coastal Resources Center, University of Rhode Island.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pomeroy, R. (1995). Community-based and co-management institutions for sustainable coastal fisheries management in Southeast Asia. Ocean and Coastal Management, 27(3), 143–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pomeroy, R. S., Mascia, M. B., & Pollnac, R. B. (2007). Marine protected areas, the social dimension. Report and documentation of the expert workshop on marine protected areas and fisheries management: Review of issues and considerations. FAO fisheries report (pp. 149–182). Rome: FAO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pretty, J. (2003). Social capital and the collective management of resources. Science, 302, 1912–1914.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rajchagool, C. (1999). Tambon administration organisation: Are the people in the dramatis personae or the audience? In Transport and communications bulletin for Asia and the Pacific no.69 (pp. 29–58). New York: Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific/United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roe, D., Mayers, J., Grieg-Gran, M., Kothari, A., Fabricius, C., & Hughes, R. (2000). Evaluating Eden: Exploring the myths and realities of community-based wildlife management. London: International Institute for Environment and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudd, M. A. (2000). Live long and prosper: Collective action, social capital and social vision. Ecological Economics, 34(1), 131–144.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sale, P. F. (2008). Management of coral reefs: Where we have gone wrong and what we can do about it. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 56(5), 805–809. doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2008.04.009.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schuttenberg, H. Z. (2001). A national perspective on community-based marine sanctuaries: Opportunities and challenges for establishing a network of community sanctuaries in Indonesia. Master’s thesis, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, Rhode Island.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuttenberg, H. Z. (2011). Understanding and strengthening effective coral reef governance: A map & compass to guide strategic change in southeast Asia. Doctoral thesis, James Cook University.

    Google Scholar 

  • True, J., & Plathong, S. (2010). Nomination document of The Andaman bioregion of Thailand for UNESCO World Heritage nomination. Bangkok: Department of National Parks.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNEP. (2006). Marine and coastal ecosystems and human well-being: A synthesis report based on the findings of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (p. 76). Nairobi: United Nations Environment Programme.

    Google Scholar 

  • Western, D., & Wright, R. M. (Eds.). (1994). Natural connections: Perspectives in community-based conservation. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, A., & Vogt, H. P. (2000). Philippine coral reefs under threat: Lessons learned after 25 years of community-based reef conservation. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 40(6), 537–550.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Estelle Jones .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jones, E., Schuttenberg, H., Gray, T., Stead, S. (2015). The Governability of Mangrove Ecosystems in Thailand: Comparative Successes of Different Governance Models. In: Jentoft, S., Chuenpagdee, R. (eds) Interactive Governance for Small-Scale Fisheries. MARE Publication Series, vol 13. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17034-3_22

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics