Skip to main content

Abstract

Channels of distribution have been approached in the literature as a system. At the same time, the concepts and approaches of systems theory have not been integrated and applied to any significant degree. This paper attempts to address this issue. The channel of distribution is conceptualized as a cybernetic or control system. The critical systems role played by marketing is highlighted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ashby, W.R. (1956), An Introduction to Cybernetics, London: Chapman and Hall.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Balakrishnan, A.V. (1973), Stochastic Differential Systems, New York: Springer-Verlog.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Beer, S. (1964), Cybernetics and Management, New York, John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beier, F.J. and L.W. Stern (1969), “Power in the Channel of Distribution,” in L.W. Stern (ed.) Distribution Channels: Behavioral Dimensions, Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 92–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkovitz, L.D. (1974), Optimal Control Theory, New York: Springer-Verlog.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Boulding, K. (1981), Ecodynamics: A New Theory of Societal Evolution, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bucklin, L.P. (1966), A Theory of Distribution Channel Structure, Berkeley, CA: IBER Special Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bucklin, L.P., ed., (1970), Vertical Marketing Systems, Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buss, W.C. (1983), “An Analysis of the Need for Market Segmentation,” in P. Murphy et al, 1983 AMA Educators’ Proceedings, Chicago: American Marketing Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carver, C.S. and M.F. Sheir (1982), “Control Theory: A Useful Conceptual Framework for Personality — Social, Clinical, and Health Psychology,” Psychological Bulletin, 92(1), 111–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dransfield, P. (1968), Engineering Systems and Control, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • El Ansary, A.I. and R.A. Robicheaux(1974), “A Theory of Channel Control: Revisited,” Journal of Marketing, 38 (January), 2–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, R.M. (1962), “Power-Dependence Relations,” American Sociological Review, 27, (February) 20–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisk, G. (1967), Marketing Systems: An Introductory Analysis, New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granzin, K.L. (1983), “Toward A General Systems Theory of Marketing,” in J.C. Rogers, ed., Developments in Marketing Science, Vol. VI, Logan, UT: Academy of Marketing Science, 269–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guyton, A.C. (1976), Textbook of Medical Physiology, Philadelphia: Saunders.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall et al. (1977), “Patterns of Interorganizational Relationships,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 22, 457–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, A.D. and R.E. Fagen (1956), “Definitions of a System,” General Systems, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Izraeli, D. and M. Etgar (1982), “Coordination in Marketing Channels: Determinants and Mechanisms,” in B. Walker et al., An Assessment of Marketing Thought and Practice, Chicago: American Marketing Association, 191–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • John, G. (1984), “An Empirical Investigation of Some Antecedents of Opportunism in a Marketing Channel,” Journal of Marketing Research, 21, (August), 278–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kay, N.M. (1979), The Innovating Firm, London: McMillan Press, Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khandawalla, P. (1977), The Design of Organizations, New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotier, P. (1972), Marketing Management: Analysis, Planning and Control, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotier, P. (1984), Marketing Management: Analysis, Planning and Control, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, A. (1975), Unified Social Science, Homewood, IL: Dorsey Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, S. and P.E. White (1961), “Exchange as a Conceptual Framework for the Study of Interorganizational Relationships,” Administrative Science Quarterly, V, 583–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levy, M. and D. Grant (1980), “Financial Terms of Sale and Control of Marketing Channel Conflict,” Journal of Marketing Research, 17, (November), 524–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundberg, C.C. (1980), “On Organizational Development Interventions: A General Systems — Cybernetic Perspective,” in T.G. Cummings, ed., Systems Theory for Organizational Development, New York, John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogata, K. (1970), Modern Control Engineering, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, L. (1982), “Explaining Control Losses in Corporate Marketing Channels: An Organization Analysis,” Journal of Marketing Research, 19, (November), 525–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pindyck, R.W. (1973), Optimal Planning for Economic Stabilization: The Application of Control Theory to Stabilization Policy, Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reidenbach, R.E. and T.A. Oliva (1981), “General Living Systems Theory and Marketing: A Framework for Analysis,” Journal of Marketing, 45, (Fall), 30–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbloom, B. (1983), Marketing Channels: A Management View, Hinsdale, IL: Dryden Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, L.W., ed. (1969), Distribution Channels: Behvioral Dimensions, Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, L.W. and A.I. El-Ansary (1982), Marketing Channels, Second Edition, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, L.W. and T. Reve (1980), “Distribution Channels as Political Economics: A Framework for Comparative Analysis,” Journal of Marketing, 44, (Summer) 52–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walters, C.G. and B.J. Bergiel (1982), Marketing Channels, Second Edition, Glenview, IL: Scott, Foreman and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, N. (1948), Cybernetics: Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine, Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, N. (1950), The Human Use of Human Beings, Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Academy of Marketing Science

About this paper

Cite this paper

Morris, M.H., Sirgy, M.J. (2015). A Cybernetic/Control Framework for Marketing Channels. In: Malhotra, N. (eds) Proceedings of the 1985 Academy of Marketing Science (AMS) Annual Conference. Developments in Marketing Science: Proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16943-9_44

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics