Skip to main content

Substitution for Chromium and Nickel in Austenitic Stainless Steels

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Springer Proceedings in Physics ((SPPHY,volume 164))

Abstract

In this investigation three alloy compositions of Fe–Al–Mn system were prepared for corrosion testing using an arc furnace with a protective atmosphere of argon, and using commercial iron, electrolytic manganese, pure aluminum, silicon and carbon. The alloys were melted into 75 g bar—shaped ingots. The anodic polarization, cyclic polarization and Tafel extrapolation techniques were applied to study and evaluate the corrosion resistance of austenitic Fe–Al–Mn alloy steels in a sulfuric acid adjusted to a pH of 2.4 and in 3.56 wt% NaCl. Though the mechanical properties and the oxidation resistance of these alloys have been reported to be comparable or superior to 18 % chromium-8 % Nickel austenitic stainless steels, the corrosion resistance was found to be poor and certainly not comparable to those of 18 % Chromium-8 % Nickel stainless steels.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. R.A. Lula, Effects of material shortages on stainless steel technology. Met. Prog. 80, 60–65 (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  2. R.M. Nadkarni, Case histories as a guide to future energy requirements for critical materials extraction systems proceedings, national symposium on critical and strategic materials, June. American chemical society, p. 108 (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  3. W. Koster, W. Tonn, The iron corner of the iron—manganese-aluminum system, archive fur das eisen hutten wesen, Vol. 7, p. 365

    Google Scholar 

  4. D.J. Schmatz, Formation of beta manganese type structure in iron—aluminum—manganese alloys. Trans. Am. Inst. Min. Metall. Eng. 215, 112

    Google Scholar 

  5. J.L. Ham, R.E. Cairns Jr., manganese joins aluminum to give strong stainless steel. Prod. Eng. 29(52), 50 (1958)

    Google Scholar 

  6. S.K. Banerji, An austenitic stainless steels without nickel and chromium. Met. Prog. 113, 54–62 (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. Charles, A. Berghezan, A. Lutts, P.L. Dancoisne, New cryogenic materials: Fe-Mn-Al alloys. Met. Prog. 119, 71–74 (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  8. J.C. Garcia, N. Rosas, Development of oxidation resistance Fe-Al-Mn alloys. Met. Prog. 122, 47–50 (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  9. H. Uhlig, Corrosion and Corrosion Control, 2nd edn. (Wiley, New York, 1971)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Salem M. Musa .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Abuzriba, M.B., Musa, S.M. (2015). Substitution for Chromium and Nickel in Austenitic Stainless Steels. In: Polychroniadis, E., Oral, A., Ozer, M. (eds) 2nd International Multidisciplinary Microscopy and Microanalysis Congress. Springer Proceedings in Physics, vol 164. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16919-4_27

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics