Skip to main content

Laboratory Blast Testing Methodologies

  • Conference paper
29th International Symposium on Shock Waves 2 (ISSW 2013)

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1529 Accesses

Abstract

Blast-induced injuries remain a critical problem facing US Forces during combat operations. As the nature of modern warfare has evolved, it is likely that the Improvised Explosive Device (IED) will remain a common battlefield threat for the foreseeable future. Thus, research devoted to improving protection, and characterizing the physiological response of people and equipment to blast exposure is and will remain a major thrust area for the DOD. Unfortunately, exact reproduction or simulation of the blast environment is technically challenging, while measuring and characterizing blast exposures is even more complex.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Wortman, J., Lottero, R.: Comparison of HULL Hydrocode Computations of Shock Tube Blockage Effects on Target Loading for Step Shocks and Rapidly-Decaying Shocks. US Army Ballistic Research Laboratory (December 1982)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ethridge, N., Lottero, R., Wortman, J., Bertrand, B.: Computational and Experimental Studies of Blockage Effects in a Blast Simulator. US Army Ballistic Research Laboratory (June 1984)

    Google Scholar 

  3. McEntire, B., Chancey, V., Walilko, T., Rule, G., Weiss, G., Bass, C., Shridharani, J.: Helmet Sensor – Transfer Function and Model Development. Prepared for US Army Medical Research and Materiel Command under Contract W81XWH-08-2-0030 (September 30, 2010)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Carr, W., Chancey, C., Stone, J., Walilko, T., Young, L.: Relationship between Repeated Blast Exposure and Neurological Function. Draft Report (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Needham, C.E.: Blast Waves. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Crepeau, J., et al.: SHAMRC Version 6, Second-Order Hydrodynamic Automatic Mesh Refinement Code. Methodology, vol. 1. Applied Research Associates, Inc. (November 2010)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Needham, C., Rule, G., Weiss, G., Przekwas, A., Tan, X., Merkle, A., Iyer, K.: Challenges in Measuring and Modeling Whole Body Blast Effects. In: NATO HFM 207 Symposium “A Survey of Blast Injury Across the Full Landscape of Military Science”, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada (2011)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Needham, C., Rule, G. (2015). Laboratory Blast Testing Methodologies. In: Bonazza, R., Ranjan, D. (eds) 29th International Symposium on Shock Waves 2. ISSW 2013. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16838-8_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics