Skip to main content

Revisiting the African Economic Growth Agenda: Focus on Inclusive and Pro-poor Growth?

  • Chapter
Book cover Accelerated Economic Growth in West Africa

Abstract

This paper determines whether the recent growth trajectory in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) has been inclusive and pro-poor and discusses potential policies in making growth more inclusive. The motivation for the study is that in the economic literature, economic growth is viewed as fundamental in achieving poverty reduction, changes in income distribution are expected to lead to improving the poverty reduction outcome stemming from growth, and initial inequality would reduce the impact of growth on poverty reduction. Two conventional definitions commonly used in the literature to measure whether economic growth is pro-poor require knowledge of whether there have been distributional changes in income and whether those changes have improved the welfare of the poor. First, regional analyses show that compared to the rest of the world’s regions, SSA experienced negative per capita growth from 1985 through 2000, and that this was accompanied by significant decline in income distribution such that by 2000 the average income of an African in the lowest quintile of economic distribution was only 90 % of the income in 1985. Second, country-specific analyses show that unlike many East Asian economies that recorded average income growth along with their poorest quintile, in SSA economies even when growth in average income occurred, the incomes of the poorest Africans fell. The exceptions were in Gabon and to a smaller extent Ghana. Third, analyses of recent data showed that like the rest of the world’s developing regions, after realizing rising poverty rates from 1981 to 1999, SSA also saw steady declines in extreme poverty rate by 10 % from 1999 through 2010. However, it was the only region where the number of extreme poor rose from 205 million in 1981 to 414 million in 2010 with its global share rising from 11 to 34 %. The average gap of the extremely poor in SSA rose from $0.53 per day in 1981 to $0.54 a day compared to the $1.25 per day threshold for the extremely poor, and compared to the developing country average of $0.51 per day to $0.29 per day for the same time period. Therefore, the aggregate SSA extreme poverty gap doubled from $40 billion in 2005 PPP terms in 1981 to $82 billion in 2005 PPP terms in 2010 compared to the aggregate for all developing countries that fell by half from $362 to $169 billion all in 2005 PPP terms during the same time period. Therefore, the paper concludes that recent growth in SSA has not been pro-poor. Suggestions are provided to sustain growth across the SSA region to make growth more inclusive.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See the discussion in World Bank (2004a).

  2. 2.

    The World Bank (2014a) uses the $1.25 a day threshold to define those living in extreme poverty.

  3. 3.

    The authors defined the poor as constituting the bottom quintile of income distribution for a country. This is treated as a relative measure of a proportion of the population, compared to an absolute measure of poverty such as income below a pre-specified threshold of $1.25 per day (based on the purchasing power parity or PPP).

  4. 4.

    For a complete survey of the definitional debate see Cord et al. (2003) and Klasen (2003).

  5. 5.

    The measures of poverty that are generally used are the headcount index and the poverty gap.

  6. 6.

    This Table is borrowed from Page (2006). However, the original computation and analysis of the growth rates in per capita income and in the income of the lowest quintile for all the countries are from Cord et al. (2003) based on the Dollar and Kraay (2002) data set. It excludes data from developed countries.

  7. 7.

    This is not because of higher fertility, which is declining, but because of longer life expectancy.

  8. 8.

    In this figure generated by the World Bank (2014a), extreme poverty is defined as living on less than $1.25 a day.

  9. 9.

    Note that extreme poverty gap is the conceptual amount of direct additional income an average extremely poor person would need to get to $1.25 per day and may not be indicative of the level of assistance required to close the gap.

  10. 10.

    The terms have been used interchangeably in the literature. However, they share the same meaning.

  11. 11.

    One necessary caveat in this discussion is to recognize that the poor may not be a homogeneous group and that country contexts may differ.

  12. 12.

    For a greater exposition on the subject, see Campos and Root (1996).

  13. 13.

    For more exposition on the subject, read Acemoglu, Daren and James A. Robinson. 2012. Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty. New York: Random House.

References

  • Acemoglu D (2009) What makes a nation rich? Esquire, November 18

    Google Scholar 

  • Adedeji OS, Du H, Opoku-Afari M (2013) Inclusive growth: an application of the social opportunity function to selected African countries. IMF Working Paper WP/13/139, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • African Development Bank (2012) African economic outlook. http://www.africaneconomicoutlook.org/en/outlook/. Accessed 15 Apr 2014

  • African Union (2013) Agenda 2063. Background Note. agenda2063.au.int/en/documents. Accessed 15 Apr 2014

    Google Scholar 

  • Aryeetey E, McKay A (2004) Operationalizing pro-poor growth: a case study on Ghana. Prepared as part of the Operationalizing Pro-Poor Growth Research Program, World Bank, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourguignon F (2003) The growth elasticity of poverty reduction: explaining heterogeneity across countries and time periods. In: Eicher T, Turnovsky S (eds) Growth and inequality. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • BP Energy Outlook 2035. http://www.bp.com/en/global/corporate/about-bp/energy-economics/energy-outlook.html. Accessed 26 May 2015

  • Byerlee D, Jackson C (2005) Agriculture, rural development and pro-poor growth: country experiences in the post reform era. Operationalizing Pro-Poor Growth Research Program, World Bank, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Campos JE, Root H (1996) The key to the Asian miracle: making shared growth credible. Brookings Institute, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen S, Ravallion M (2004) How did the world’s poorest fare in the 1990s? Global Monitoring Database. World Bank, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Clements B, Gupta S, Nozaki M (2011) What happens to social spending in IMF-supported programs? IMF Staff Discussion Note 15

    Google Scholar 

  • Collier P (2007) The bottom billion: why the poorest countries are failing and what can be done about it? Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Cord L, Lopez JH, Page J (2003) ‘When I use a word’…pro poor growth and poverty reduction. In: Krakowski M (ed) Attacking poverty: what makes growth pro-poor? Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, Baden-Baden

    Google Scholar 

  • Datt G, Ravallion M (1992) Growth and redistribution components of change in poverty measures: a decomposition with application to Brazil and India in the 1980s. J Dev Econ 38(2):275–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deininger K, Squire L (1996) A new data set measuring income inequality. World Bank Econ Rev 10:565–591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dollar D, Kraay A (2002) Growth is good for the poor. J Econ Growth 7:195–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easterly W (1999) Life during growth. J Econ Growth 4:239–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foster J, Szekely M (2000) How good is growth. Asian Dev Rev 18:59–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Fosu A (2011) Growth, inequality and poverty reduction in developing countries: recent global evidence. United Nations University, World Institute for Development Economics Research (UNU-WIDER) Working Paper 2011/01, Helsinki, Finland

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaddah M, Munro A (2011) The progressivity of health care services in Ghana. Discussion Paper 11-14, National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies (GRIPS), Tokyo, Japan

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Verdu R, Selasse AA, Thomas A (2011) How inclusive has Africa’s recent high-growth episode been? In: Regional economic outlook: Sub-Saharan Africa. International Monetary Fund, Washington, DC, pp 15–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Juma C (2011) The new harvest: agricultural innovation in Africa. Oxford University Press, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Kakwani N, Pernia E (2000) What is pro-poor growth? Asian Dev Rev 18:1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Klasen S (2003) In search of the Holy Grail: how to achieve pro-poor growth? In: Proceedings of ABCDE-Europe. World Bank, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraay A (2004) When is growth pro-poor? Cross-country evidence. IMF Working Paper WP/04/47

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraay A (2005) When is growth pro-poor? Evidence from a panel of countries. J Dev Econ 80(1):198–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lopez JH (2004) Pro-growth, pro-poor: is there a tradeoff? World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 3378, Washington, DC (August)

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2006) Promoting pro-poor growth: key policy messages. OECD, Paris

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Okidi JA, Ssewanyana S, Bategeka L, Mihumuza F (2005) Operationalizing pro-poor growth: a case study of Uganda. Prepared as part of the operationalizing pro-poor growth research program, World Bank, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (2001) Rising to the global challenge: partnership for reducing world poverty. Statement by the DAC high level meeting, OECD, Paris, 25–26 April

    Google Scholar 

  • Page J (2006) Strategies for pro-poor growth: pro-poor, pro-growth or both? J Afr Econ 15(4):510–542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patillo C, Gupta S, Carey K (2006) Sustaining and accelerating pro-poor growth in Africa. International Monetary Fund, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravallion M (2001) Growth, inequality and poverty: looking beyond averages. World Dev 29:1803–1815

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravallion M, Chen S (1997) What can new survey data tell us about recent changes in distribution and poverty? World Bank Econ Rev 11:357–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stuart E (2011) Making growth inclusive: some lessons for countries and the literature. Oxfam Research Report (April)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sy A (2014) Five questions answered on Africa’s rising economic growth. Brookings Institution (February 3). www.brookings.edu/blogs/africa-in-focus/posts/2014/02/02-africa-rising-economic-growth-sy. Accessed 2 June 2014

  • Thomas Y, Dailami M, Dareshwar A, Kaufmann D, Kishor N, Lopez R, Wang Y (2000) The quality of growth. Oxford University Press, New York, NY

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • UN (2000) A better world for all. United Nations, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • UN High-Level Panel of Eminent Persons on the Post-2015 Development Agenda (2013) A new global partnership: eradicate poverty and transform economies through sustainable development. Report to the UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-Moon

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (UN) (2014) World economic situation and prospects 2014. United Nations, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Economic Commission for Africa (UNECA) (2013) Economic report on Africa 2013, making the most of Africa’s commodities: industrializing for growth, jobs and economic transformation. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. www.uneca.org/sites/default/files/publications/era2013_eng_fin_low.pdf. Accessed 20 May 2014

  • World Bank (2014a) The state of the poor: where are the poor and where are they poorest? Poverty reduction and economic management (PREM). Washington DC. www.worldbank.org/content/dam/Worldbank/document/State_of_the_poor_paper_April17.pdf. Accessed 30 May 2014

  • World Bank (2014b) Africa’s growth set to reach 5.2 percent in 2014 with strong investment growth and household spending. Washington, DC (April 7). www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2014/04/07/. Accessed 21 June 2014

  • World Bank (2000) World development report: attacking poverty. The World Bank, Washington, DC

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2004) Poverty reduction strategy papers—progress in implementation. World Bank, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2005) Pro-poor growth in the 1990s: lessons and insights from 14 countries. Operationalizing Pro-Poor Growth Research Program, Washington, DC

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank and International Monetary Fund (2005) Global monitoring report 2005. World Bank, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to William A. Amponsah .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Amponsah, W.A. (2016). Revisiting the African Economic Growth Agenda: Focus on Inclusive and Pro-poor Growth?. In: Seck, D. (eds) Accelerated Economic Growth in West Africa. Advances in African Economic, Social and Political Development. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16826-5_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics