Abstract
Plant genetics and breeding are long-term endeavor that require dedicated expertise and infrastructure plus substantial and stable funding. The development of new vegetable cultivars or breeding techniques requires time, effort and funding. Likewise, access to technology and to crop diversity remains essential for the development of vegetable cultivars. Vegetable breeding is characterised by continuous innovations and the development of new cultivars that meet the requirements of growers and consumers. The driving force behind this innovation is acquiring or increasing seed market share. However, breeding new vegetable cultivars requires high investments that can only be recouped if the breeding companies can commercialise the cultivar for a certain period. Intellectual property rights on cultivars are regarded by some in the private sector as the ultimate guardian of plant breeding entrepreneurs. They are viewed as the opportunity to control as many aspects of the invention as possible, thereby strangling the innovative capacity of the competition. As a result, a few multinationals dominate the global seed trade, while public sector plant breeding and local, small- and medium-size seed enterprises have a marginal role. Plant variety rights through patents may affect both vegetable diversity and the progress of plant breeding research, except within the company holding the patent. While obviously benefiting that company, it is a big step backwards for the plant breeding community and by extension, for horticulture itself. Some vegetable breeding programs were merged to reduce costs, which could lead to growers being dependent on a narrow genetic background that could contribute to biodiversity reduction and food insecurity. Access to “advanced” genetic resources is an important condition for a healthy and innovative vegetable breeding sub-sector and food security. We argued that the private sector relies on fundamental research and proof-of-concept demonstrations of feasibility from the public sector, and the public sector expects their discoveries to be expanded and implemented commercially by the private sector. Hence, we advocate effective and synergistic private-public partnerships for enhancing the use of vegetable diversity, accelerating its breeding and increasing genetic gains.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ali M (2002) The vegetable sector in Indochina: a synthesis. The vegetable sector in Indochina countries: farm and household perspectives on poverty alleviation. The World Vegetable Center, Bangkok
Ali M, Hau VTB (2001) Vegetables in Bangladesh. Technical bulletin 25. The World Vegetable Center, Shanhua
Bettencourt E, Konopka J (1990) Vegetables. In: Directory of germplasm collection. IBPGR, Rome, pp 204–220
Daunay MC, Lester RN, Ano G (1997) Les aubergines. In: Charrier A, Jacquot M, Hamon S, Nicolas D (eds) L’amélioration des Plantes Tropicales. Repéres. CIRAD-ORSTOM, Paris, pp 83–107
Dias JS (1989) The use of molecular markers in selection of vegetables. Acta Hortic 3:175–181
Dias JS (2010a) Impact of improved vegetable cultivars in overcoming food insecurity. In: Nath P, Gaddagimath PB (eds) Horticulture and livelihood security. Scientific Publishers, Jodhpur, pp 303–339
Dias JS (2010b) Impact of improved vegetable cultivars in overcoming food insecurity. Euphytica 176:125–136. doi:10.1007/s10681-010-0237-5
Dias JS (2012a) Vegetable breeding for nutritional quality and health benefits. In: Carbone K (ed) Cultivar: chemical properties, antioxidant activities and health benefits. Nova Science Publishers, Inc., Hauppauge, pp 1–81
Dias JS (2012b) Major classes of phytonutriceuticals in vegetables and health benefits: a review. J Nutr Ther 1:31–62. doi:10.6000/1929-5634.2012.01.01.5
Dias JS (2012c) Nutritional quality and health benefits of vegetables: a review. Food Nutr Sci 3:1354–1374. doi:10.4236/fns.2012.310179
Dias JS (2014) Guiding strategies for breeding vegetable cultivars. Agric Sci 5:9–32. doi:10.4236/as.2014.51002
Dias JS, Ortiz R (2012a) Transgenic vegetable crops: progress, potentials and prospects. Plant Breed Rev 35:151–246
Dias JS, Ortiz R (2012b) Transgenic vegetable breeding for nutritional quality and health benefits. Food Nutr Sci 3:1209–1219. doi:10.4236/fns.2012.39159
Dias JS, Ryder EJ (2011) World vegetable industry: production, breeding, trends. Hortic Rev 38:299–356
Dias JS, Ryder E (2012) Impact of plant breeding on the world vegetable industry. Acta Hortic 935:13–22
Gockowski J, Mbazo’o J, Mbah G, Moulende T (2003) African traditional leafy vegetables and the urban and peri-urban poor. Food Policy 28:221–235
Gousset C, Collonnier C, Mulya K, Mariska I, Rotino GL, Besse P, Servaes A, Sihachakr D (2005) Solanum torvum, as a useful source of resistance against bacterial and fungal diseases for improvement of eggplant (S. melongena L.). Plant Sci 168:319–327
Hayes HK, Jones DF (1916) First generation crosses in cucumber. Republic Conf Agric Exp Stat 5:319–322
HKI (2010) Homestead food production model contributes to improved household food security, nutrition and female empowerment-experience from scaling-up programs in Asia (Bangladesh, Cambodia, Nepal and Philippines). Nutr Bull 8:1–8
Key N, Runsten D (1999) Contract farming, smallholders, and rural development in Latin America: the organization of agroprocessing firms and the scale of outgrower production. World Dev 27:381–401
Lester RN, Jaeger PML, Spierings BHB, Bleijendaal HPO, Hooloway HLO (1990) African eggplant: a review of collecting in West Africa. Plant Gen Resour Newsl 81–82:17–26
Mao W, Yi J, Sihachakr D (2008) Development of core subset for the collection of Chinese cultivated eggplant using morphological-basal passport data. Plant Genet Resour 6:33–40
OECD (2009) The bioeconomy to 2030. Designing a policy agenda. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris
Rausser G, Simon L, Ameden H (2000) Public-private alliances in biotechnology: can they narrow the knowledge gaps between rich and poor? Food Policy 25:499–513
Rohrbach DD, Minde IJ, Howard J (2003) Looking beyond national boundaries: regional harmonization of seed policies, laws and regulations. Food Policy 28:317–333
Ryder EJ (2005) Intellectual property rights for plants. The case for a new law. Chronica Hortic 45(2):5–11
Spielman D, Hartwich F, von Grebmer K (2007) Public-private partnerships in international research. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC
UPOV (1994) International Convention for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants of 2 December 1961, as revised at Geneva on 10 November 1972, 23 October 1978, and March 1991. UPOV publication 221. International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants, Genéve, Switzerland
Weinberger K, Genova C (2005) Vegetable production in Bangladesh: commercialization and rural livelihoods. Technical bulletin 33. The World Vegetable Center, Shanhua
Weinberger K, Msuya J (2004) Indigenous vegetables in Tanzania: significance and prospects. Technical bulletin 31. The World Vegetable Center, Shanhua
Yarkin C, Murray A (2003) Assessing the role of the University of California in the State’s biotechnology economy: heightened impact over time. University of California, Berkley
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dias, J.S., Ortiz, R. (2015). Vegetable Breeding Industry and Property Rights. In: Lichtfouse, E. (eds) Sustainable Agriculture Reviews. Sustainable Agriculture Reviews, vol 17. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16742-8_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16742-8_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-16741-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-16742-8
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)