Skip to main content

Design and Optimization of an Integrated System to Recover Energy from a Gas Pressure Reduction Station

  • Chapter
Progress in Clean Energy, Volume 1

Abstract

This chapter deals with thermodynamic modeling, parametric analysis, and optimization of an integrated system to recover energy from pressure reduction station in city gate station (CGS). This chapter aims to fully cover the thermodynamic modeling of an integrated system consisting of a turbo expander, an organic Rankine cycle (ORC) and a proton exchange membrane (PEM) electrolyzer to produce and store hydrogen. The pressure of natural gas in transmission pipeline in Iran gas system is high which sometimes go beyond 7 MPa. This pressure needs to be reduced near the cities pipeline pressure to 1.7 MPa. This pressure reduction results in ample potential to recover energy to generate electricity. In the proposed integrated system in this chapter, a comprehensive parametric analysis including the effect of main parameters such as natural gas preheat temperature, the natural gas pressure inlet to turbo expander, the heater mass fuel flow rate, and high temperature of ORC on the system performance is investigated.

The results show that although the natural gas inlet pressure has a trivial effect on exergy efficiency of the ORC cycle, PEM electrolyzer, and turbo expander, it has a significant effect on turbo expander power output and hydrogen production rate. Besides, results indicate that increase in preheat temperature of natural gas from 130 to 165 °C has the favorable effect on the turbo expander power output and exergy destruction rate of ORC components. Also, it is concluded that an increase in preheat temperature leads to a decrease in hydrogen production from 15.9 to 14.8 kg/day due to decrease in ORC output electricity. In order to determine the optimum value of design parameters, an optimization method is applied. The genetic algorithm optimization results show there are acceptable values for five design parameters which guarantee the optimum performance of the novel proposed integrated system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Abbreviations

a:

Anode

c:

Cathode

E:

Activation energy (kJ/mole)

Ėx :

Exergy flow rate (W)

h:

Specific enthalpy (kJ/kg)

LHV:

Lower heating value (kJ/kg)

:

Mass flow rate, kg s−1

ORC:

Organic Rankine Cycle

P:

Pressure (bar)

PEM:

Polymer exchange membrane

:

Work, (W)

ΔP :

Pressure drop, (kPa)

λ :

Number of mole of fuel to number of mole of air (−)

η :

Efficiency (−)

a:

Actual

Cond:

Condenser

Eva:

Evaporator

ex:

Exergy

f:

Fuel

is:

Isentropic

TE:

Turbo expander

Tur:

Turbine

References

  1. Rahman MM (2010) Power generation from pressure reduction in the natural gas supply chain in Bangladesh. J Mech Eng 41(2):89–95

    Google Scholar 

  2. Seresht RT, Ja H (2010) Retrofit of Tehran City gate station (CGS No. 2) by using turboexpander

    Google Scholar 

  3. Howard CR (2009) Hybrid turboexpander and fuel cell system for power recovery at natural gas pressure pressure reduction stations. Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Queen’s University, Kingston

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kostowski W (2010) The possibility of energy generation within the conventional natural gas transport system. Strojarstvo: časopis za teoriju i praksu u strojarstvu 52(4):429–440

    Google Scholar 

  5. Farzaneh-Gord M, Sadi M (2008) Enhancing energy output in Iran’s natural gas pressure drop stations by cogeneration. J Energy Institute 81(4):191–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kostowski WJ, Usón S (2013) Comparative evaluation of a natural gas expansion plant integrated with an IC engine and an organic Rankine cycle. Energy Conversion Manage 75:509–516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. He T, Ju Y (2013) Design and optimization of natural gas liquefaction process by utilizing gas pipeline pressure energy. Appl Thermal Eng 57(1):1–6

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ahmadi P, Dincer I, Rosen MA (2012) Energy and exergy analyses of hydrogen production via solar-boosted ocean thermal energy conversion and PEM electrolysis. Int J Hydrogen Energy 38:1795–1805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ni M, Leung MK, Leung DY (2008) Energy and exergy analysis of hydrogen production by a proton exchange membrane (PEM) electrolyzer plant. Energy Conversion Manage 49(10):2748–2756

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Khanmohammadi S, Ahmadi P, Mirzei D (2014) Thermodynamic modeling and optimization of a novel integrated system to recover energy from a gas pressure reduction station. In: Proceedings of the 13th international conference of clean energy, Istanbul, Turkey, pp 2357–2369

    Google Scholar 

  11. Nieminen J, Dincer I, Naterer G (2010) Comparative performance analysis of PEM and solid oxide steam electrolysers. Int J Hydrogen Energy 35(20):10842–10850

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Khanmohammadi S, Azimian AR (2013) Exergoeconomic evaluation of a two-pressure level fired combined-cycle power plant. J Energy Eng doi:10.1061/(ASCE)EY.1943-7897.0000152

  13. Khanmohammadi S, Azimian AR, Khanmohammadi S (2013) Exergy and exergo–economic evaluation of Isfahan steam power plant. Int J Exergy 12(2):249–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ahmadi P, Dincer I, Rosen MA (2011) Exergy, exergoeconomic and environmental analyses and evolutionary algorithm based multi-objective optimization of combined cycle power plants. Energy 36(10):5886–5898

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ameri M, Ahmadi P, Khanmohammadi S (2008) Exergy analysis of a 420 MW combined cycle power plant. Int J Energy Res 32(2):175–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Meigounpoory MR, Ahmadi P, Ghaffarizadeh AR, Khanmohammadi S (2008) Optimization of combined cycle power plant using sequential quadratic programming. In: ASME heat transfer summer conference collocated with the fluids engineering, energy sustainability, and 3rd energy nanotechnology conferences

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ahmadi P, Dincer I, Rosen MA (2013) Performance assessment and optimization of a novel integrated multi-generation system for residential buildings. Energy Build 67:568–578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ghaffarizadeh A, Eftekhari M, Esmailizadeh AK, Flann NS (2013) Quantitative trait loci mapping problem: an extinction-based multi-objective evolutionary algorithm approach. Algorithms 6(3):546–564

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shoaib Khanmohammadi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Khanmohammadi, S., Ahmadi, P., Atashkari, K., Kamali, R.K. (2015). Design and Optimization of an Integrated System to Recover Energy from a Gas Pressure Reduction Station. In: Dincer, I., Colpan, C., Kizilkan, O., Ezan, M. (eds) Progress in Clean Energy, Volume 1. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16709-1_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16709-1_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-16708-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-16709-1

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics