Skip to main content

Thermodynamic Modeling of an Integrated Energy System for Poly-generation Design

  • Chapter
  • 2193 Accesses

Abstract

Integrated energy production systems based on the renewable or fossil energy sources for poly-generation applications are inevitable in the near future for both environmental and sustainability concerns. Increasing the overall efficiency by combining system decreases the energy consumption and increases the system outputs such as electricity, heat, hot water, cooling, hydrogen, oxygen, and ext. Considering the global energy demands, the increase of efficiency of poly-generation systems will decrease emissions and therefore helps to protect the environment. Moreover, not only decreasing the emissions but also reducing the energy consumption is very important to achieve more sustainable systems, and it is again possible with integrated systems. In this chapter, thermodynamic assessment formulations and energy and exergy efficiency of a new poly-generation design which consists of biomass gasification, solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC), organic Rankine cycle (ORC), and double-effect absorption cooling and heating systems are given and analyzed in detail through energy, exergy, and sustainability approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Abbreviations

E:

Energy, kJ

Ė :

Energy rate, kW

ex:

Specific exergy, kJ/kg

Ėx :

Exergy rate, kW

G:

Gibbs free energy, kJ

h:

Specific enthalpy, kJ/kg

:

Mass flow rate, kg/s

n:

Mole number

Q:

Heat, kJ

\( \dot{Q} \) :

Heat rate, kW

s:

Entropy, kJ/kg

T:

Temperature, K

x:

Mole fraction

W:

Work, kJ

:

Power, kW

Δ:

Change in variable

ξ:

Chemical exergy coefficient

η:

Energy efficiency

ψ:

Exergy efficiency

A:

Ash

a:

Ambient

c:

Coal

ch:

Chemical

D:

Destruction

f:

Fuel

H:

Hydrogen

in:

Inlet

ke:

Kinetic energy

O:

Oxygen

out:

Outlet

pe:

Potential

ph:

Physical

S:

Sulfur

W:

Water

HHV:

Higher heating value

LHV:

Lower heating value

References

  1. Dincer I, Zamfirescu C (2012) Renewable‐energy‐based multigeneration systems. Int J Energy Res 36(15):1403–1415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ahmadi P, Rosen MA, Dincer I (2012) Multi-objective exergy-based optimization of a polygeneration energy system using an evolutionary algorithm. Energy 46(1):21–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Rosen MA, Scott DS (1988) Energy and exergy analyses of a production process for methanol from natural gas. Int J Hydro Energy 13(10):617–623

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bilgen S, Kaygusuz K (2008) Second law (Exergy) analysis of cogeneration system. Energy Sources, Part (A) 30(13):267–1280

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kamate SC, Gangavati PB (2009) Cogeneration in sugar industries technology options and performance parameters—a review. Cogeneration Distributed Generation J 24(4):6–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gao L, Jin H, Liu Z, Zheng D (2004) Exergy analysis of coal-based poly-generation system for power and chemical production. Energy 29(12–15):2359–2371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Carvalho M, Lozano MA, Serra LM (2012) Multicriteria synthesis of trigeneration systems considering economic and environmental aspects. Appl Energy 91(1):245–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Khaliq A, Kumar R, Dincer I (2009) Performance analysis of an industrial waste heat‐based trigeneration system. Int J Energy Res 33(8):737–744

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ahmadi P, Rosen MA, Dincer I (2011) Greenhouse gas emission and exergo-environmental analyses of a trigeneration energy system. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 5(6):1540–1549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ozturk M, Dincer I (2013) Thermodynamic analysis of a solar-based multi-generation system with hydrogen production. Appl Therm Eng 51(1–2):1235–1244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ozturk M, Dincer I (2013) Thermodynamic assessment of an integrated solar power tower and coal gasification system for multi-generation purposes. Energy Conversion Manage 76:1061–1072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ghamarian A, Cambel AB (1982) Biomass exergy analysis of Illinois No. 6 coal. Energy 7(6):483–488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Vassilev SV, Vassilev CG (2009) A new approach for the combined chemical and mineral classification of the inorganic matter in coal 1, chemical and mineral classification systems. Fuel 88(3):235–245

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Dincer I, Rosen MA (2013) Exergy: energy, environment, and sustainable development, 2nd edn. Elsevier, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bejan A, Tsatsaronis G, Moran M (1996) Thermal design and optimization. Wiley, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Kotas TJ (1985) The exergy method of thermal plant analysis, 1st edn. Buttworth Scientific, London

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mansouri TM, Ahmadi P, Kaviri AG, Jaafar MNM (2012) Exergetic and economic evaluation of the effect of HRSG configurations on the performance of combined cycle power plants. Energy Conversion Manage 58:47–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Szargut J, Styrylska T (1964) Approximate evaluation of the exergy of fuels. Brennst Waerme Kraft 16(12):589–596 (In German)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Szargut J (2005) Exergy method: technical and ecological applications. WIT, Southampton

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kameyama H, Yoshinda K, Yamauchi S, Fueki K (1982) Evaluation of reference exergies for the elements. Appl Energy 11(1):69–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lozano MA, Valero A (1982) Evaluation of reference exergies for the elements. Appl Energy 11(1):69–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Gallo WLR, Milanez LF (1990) Choice of a reference state for exergetic analysis. Energy 15(2):113–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Rivero R, Garfias M (2006) Standard chemical exergy of elements updated. Energy 31(15):3310–3326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Szargut J (1990) Chemical exergies of the elements. Appl Energy 32(4):269–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kotas TJ (1980) Exergy concepts for thermal plant: first of two papers on exergy techniques in thermal plant analysis. Int J Heat Fluid Flow 2(3):105–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Shoaib M (2011) Energy and exergy analyses of biomass Co-firing based pulverized coal power generation. A Master Thesis, University of Ontario Institute of Technology

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yunus Emre Yuksel .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Yuksel, Y.E., Ozturk, M. (2015). Thermodynamic Modeling of an Integrated Energy System for Poly-generation Design. In: Dincer, I., Colpan, C., Kizilkan, O., Ezan, M. (eds) Progress in Clean Energy, Volume 1. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16709-1_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16709-1_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-16708-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-16709-1

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics