Skip to main content

The Tradition of Scientific Philosophy in Romania

  • Chapter
Romanian Studies in Philosophy of Science

Part of the book series: Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science ((BSPS,volume 313))

  • 483 Accesses

Abstract

This is a survey of Romanian scientific philosophy, focused on two important contributions: the theoretical programs and methodological models developed by several scientists working in the emergent sciences of complex, organized, and evolving domains; and the project of a “mathematical epistemology” (or “axiomatic philosophy”), proposed by a group of mathematicians from the University of Bucharest in the 1930s, starting from an analysis of the abstract structural construction of theories in mathematics and natural science.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Albrecht J (ed) (1988) Energeia und Ergon, Sprachliche Variationen– Sprachgeschichte– Sprachtypology: Studia in Honorem Eugenio Coserio, 3 Bde. Gunter Narr, Tubingen

    Google Scholar 

  • Albrecht J (2003) El paradigm Incompleto de Eugenio Coseriu: Tares Pendiente para la Tercera Generation. Odissea 3:41–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbilian D (1937) Eine Axiomatisierung der klassischen Mechanik. Comptes Rendus de l’Inst Des Sc De Roum II(2):1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbilian D (1940) Determinism and order. In: Onicescu O (ed) (1940)

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbilian D (1942) The place of axiomatics (in Romanian). In: Barbilian D (ed) Opera didactică. Editura tehnică, Bucuresti

    Google Scholar 

  • Beard TR, Gabriel LA (1999) Economics, entropy and the environment: the extraordinary economics of Nicholas Georgescu-Roegen. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernardo Paniagua JM (1995) La construccion de la linguistica. Un debate epistemologico. Ed. Universitat de Valencia

    Google Scholar 

  • Berr H Sur Bernheim et Xenopol. Revue Synth Hist XVIII:354–358

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonaiuti M (ed) (2011) From bioeconomics to degrowth: Georgescu-Roegen’s “New Economics” in eight studies. Taylor & Francis, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Boutroux E (1908) La théorie de l’histoire par Alexandre D. Xenopol. Académie des sciences morale et politiques, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Colvin P (1977) Ontological and epistemological commitment and social relations in science. The case of the Arithmomorphic System of Science Production. In: Mendelsohn E et al (eds) (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  • Coseriu E (1955–1956) Determinacion y entorno. Dos problemas de una linguitica del hablar. Rom Jahrb 7:29–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Coseriu E (1957) Sincronia, diacronia e historia. El problema del cambio linguistico. Rev Fac Humanidades y Cienc (Montevideo) 15:201–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Coseriu E (1978) Les universaux linguistiques (et les autres). In: Proceedings of the eleventh international congress of Linguists, I, Bologna, pp 47–73 (trans: Linguistic (and other) Universals. In: Makkai A, Heilmann L (eds) (1977) Linguistics at the crossroads. Padua, pp 317–346)

    Google Scholar 

  • Coseriu E (1985) Linguistic competence: what is it really? The presidential address of the Modern Humanities Research Association, read at University College, London, 11 Jan 1985

    Google Scholar 

  • Coseriu E (1988) Sprachkompetenz. Grundzuge einer Theorie des Sprechens. Bearbeitet von Heinrich Weber, Franke Verlag, Tübingen

    Google Scholar 

  • Coseriu E (2000a) The principles of linguistics as a cultural science. Transylvanian Rev (Cluj) IX(1):108–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Coseriu E (2000b) Structural semantics and ‘Cognitive’ semantics. Logos Lang (Tübingen) I(1):19–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Coseriu E (2003) Geschichte der Sprachphilosophie. Von dem Anfangen bis Rousseau. neu bearbeitet und erweitert von Jörn Albrecht, Tübingen

    Google Scholar 

  • Croce B (1939) Conversazioni critiche. Bari (serie quinta)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dumitriu A (ed) (1941–1945) Caiete de filosofie. Atelierul de Arte Grafice Independenta, Bucuresti

    Google Scholar 

  • Dumitriu A (1942) Foreword. Caiete de filosofie 4:111–113

    Google Scholar 

  • Froda A (1959) La finitude en mécanique classique, ses axiomes et leur implications. In: Henkin L, Suppes P, Tarski A (eds) The axiomatic method with special reference to geometry and physics. North-Holland, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Froda A (1960) Analyse du principe de continuité en physique. In: Suppes P et al (eds) Logic, methodology and philosophy of science. Stanford, North-Holland/Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Froda A (1971) Error and paradox in mathematics (in Romanian). Editura enciclopedică română, Bucuresti

    Google Scholar 

  • Geană G (2003–2004) The actuality of Simion Mehedinți’s thought (in Romanian). Studii si cercetări de geografie xlix:13–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Georgescu-Roegen N (1933) Statistical method (in Romanian). Institutul de statistică generală a statului, Bucuresti

    Google Scholar 

  • Georgescu-Roegen N (1966) Analytical economics: issues and problems. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Georgescu-Roegen N (1967) An epistemological analysis of statistics as the science of rational guessing. Analele Universităţii din Bucureşti, Seria Acta Logica X:61–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Georgescu-Roegen N (1971) The entropy law and the economic process. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Georgescu-Roegen N (1974) Mechanistic dogma and economics. Methodol Sci vii(3):178–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Georgescu-Roegen N (1986) The entropy law and the economic process in retrospect. East Econ J 12:3–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Haret S (1910) Mécanique sociale. Gauthier-Villars, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiemstra P (1987) Alexandru D. Xenopol and the development of Romanian historiography. Taylor & Francis, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Itkonnen E (2011) On Coseriu’s legacy. Energeia III:1–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Joja A et al (eds) (1971) Recherches sur la philosophie des sciences. Editions de l’Académie Roumaine, Bucharest

    Google Scholar 

  • Kabatek J, Murguia A (1997) “Die Sachen sage wie sie sind…” Eugenio Coseriu im Gespräch. Gunter Narr Verlag, Tübingen

    Google Scholar 

  • Lalescu T (1911) Mécanique Sociale de Mr. Spiru Harert (in Romanian). Convorbiri Literare XLX. In: Lalescu T (2013), Opere, Ed. II, Editura Academiei Romane, Bucuresti :632–637

    Google Scholar 

  • Lozada G (1995) Georgescu-Roegen’s defense of classical thermodynamics revisited. Ecol Econ 14:31–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayumi K (1995) Nicholas Georgescu-Roegen (1906–1994): an admirable epistemologist. Struct Chang Econ Dyn 6:261–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayumi K, Gowdy JM (1999) Bioeconomics and sustainability: essays in honor of Nicholas Georgescu-Roegen. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehedinți S (1931) Terra. Introduction in geography as science (in Romanian). Editura Națională S. Ciornei, Bucuresti

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehedinți S (1946) Premises and conclusions to Terra (in Romanian). Imprimeria Națională, Bucuresti

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendelsohn E et al (eds) (1977) Sociology of the sciences, vol 1. Reidel, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Moisil GC (1937) Les Etapes de la connaissance mathematique. In: Joja et al (ed) 1971:131–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Moisil GC (1942) La tendance nouvelle dans les sciences mathematiques. In: Joja et al (ed) 1971:145–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Moisil GC (1971) Les mathématiques structurelles et leur applications. In: Joja Ath et al (ed) (1971). pp 131–173

    Google Scholar 

  • Neculcea M (1942) Thought and formalism (in Romanian). Caiete de filosofie 4:181–195

    Google Scholar 

  • Nemoianu V (1990) Mihai Şora and the traditions of Romanian philosophy. Rev Metaphys 43(3):591–605

    Google Scholar 

  • Onicescu O (1938) Chaine statistique et déterminisme. Revue de l’université libre de Bruxelles (1):45–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Onicescu O (ed) (1940) The problem of determinism. Seminar of philosophy of Sciences of the Bucharest University, (in Romanian), Editura Oficiul de Librărie, Bucureşti (French trans: Joja Ath. et al (eds) (1971))

    Google Scholar 

  • Onicescu O (1944) Principles of scientific knowledge (in Romanian). Editura Oficul de Librărie, Bucuresti

    Google Scholar 

  • Onicescu O (1971) Principles de logique et de philosophie mathématique. Ed. de l’Académie Roumaine, Bucharest

    Google Scholar 

  • Onicescu O (1975) Invariantive mechanics. Springer, Vienna/Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pinch T (1977) What does a proof do if it does not prove? A study of the social conditions and metaphysical divisions leading to David Bohm and John von Neumann failing to communicate in quantum mechanics. In: Mendelsohn E et al (eds) (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rickert H (1901) Les Príncipes fondamentaux de l’histoire par Alexandre D. Xenopol. Historische Zeitschrift, München und Leipzig, t. LXXXVI, pp 464–470

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlegel R, Pfouts R, Hochwald W, Johnson GL Four reviews of Nicholas Georgescu-Roegen, The entropy law and the economic process. J Econ Iss 7(3):475–499

    Google Scholar 

  • Seppanen L (1982) Bedeutung, Bezeichnung, Sinn: Zur Sprachauffassung Eugenio Coserius. Neuphilosophische Mitteilungen 83:329–338

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoilow S (1945) Axiomatic thinking in modern mathematics (in Romanian). Caiete de filosofie 10:3–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Suppes P (1993) The transcendental character of determinism. Midwest Stud Philos Xviii:242–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suppes P (1994) In appreciation of the work of Alexandre Froda. Lib Math xiv:1–2

    Google Scholar 

  • Teodorescu N (1966) Physique théorique et physique mathématique. Bulletin Mathématique de la Société des sciences mathématiques de la République Socialiste de Roumanie 10:3–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward L (1913) Two books on social mechanics. Am J Sociol 18(6):814–819

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xenopol AD (1900) “Les sciences naturelles et l’histoire” I. Rev Philos XXV 50(10):374–387

    Google Scholar 

  • Xenopol AD (1908) Théorie de l’histoire. Leroux Ed., Paris (2th edition of the Principes fondamentaux de l’histoire. Leroux Ed., Paris, 1899)

    Google Scholar 

  • Xenopol AD (1909) Zur Logik der Geschichte. Hist Z 102 Bd(3 Folge 6 Bd):473–498

    Google Scholar 

  • Xenopol AD (1911) L’inférence en histoire. Revue Synth Hist XXII:357–368

    Google Scholar 

  • Zlatev J (2011) From cognitive to integral linguistics and back again. Intellectica 56:125–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Zub A (1973) Alexandru D. Xenopol. Biobibliografie. Editura enciclopedică română/Editura militară, Bucuresti

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ilie Pârvu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pârvu, I. (2015). The Tradition of Scientific Philosophy in Romania. In: Pȃrvu, I., Sandu, G., Toader, I. (eds) Romanian Studies in Philosophy of Science. Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science, vol 313. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16655-1_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics