Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Universitext ((UTX))

Abstract

The system-theoretic study of interconnected systems is not new. It started with the work by Gilbert (1963) on controllability and observability for generic classes of systems in parallel, series, and feedback interconnections. Complete characterizations for multivariable linear systems were obtained by Callier and Nahum (1975) for series and feedback interconnections and in a short note by Fuhrmann (1975) for parallel interconnections. We refer the reader to Chapter 10 for a proof of these classical characterizations using the techniques developed here. However, the interconnection structures of most complex systems are generally not of the series, parallel, or feedback type. Thus, one needs to pass from the standard interconnections to more complex ones, where the interconnection pattern between the node systems is described by a weighted directed graph. This will be done in the first part of this chapter. The main tool used is the classical concept of strict system equivalence. This concept was first introduced by Rosenbrock in the 1970s for the analysis of higher-order linear systems and was subsequently developed into a systematic tool for realization theory through the work of Fuhrmann. Rosenbrock and Pugh (1974) provided an extension of this notion toward a permanence principle for networks of linear systems. Section 9.2 contains a proof of a generalization of this permanence principle for dynamic interconnections. From this principle we then derive our main results on the reachability and observability of interconnected systems. This leads to very concise and explicit characterizations of reachability and observability for homogeneous networks consisting of identical SISO systems. Further characterizations of reachability are obtained for special interconnection structures, such as paths, cycles, and circulant structures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • B. Bamieh, F. Paganini, M. Dahleh, “Distributed control of spatially invariant systems”, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, vol. 47 (7), (2002), 1091–1107.

    Google Scholar 

  • R.R. Bitmead and B.D.O. Anderson, “The matrix Cauchy index: Properties and applications”, SIAM J. Control Optim., vol. 33(4), (1977), 655–672.

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Bittanti and P. Colaneri, Periodic Systems: Filtering and Control, Communications and Control Engineering Series, Springer-Verlag, London, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Bott and R.J. Duffin, “Impedance synthesis without the use of transformers”, J. Applied Physics, vol. 20, (1940), 816.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • R.W. Brockett, “Linear feedback systems and the groups of Galois and Lie”, Linear Algebra Appl., vol. 50, (1983), 45–60.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • R.W. Brockett, “On the control of a flock by a leader”, Proc. Steklov Institute of Mathematics, vol. 268 (1), (2010), 49–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • R.W. Brockett and J.L. Willems, “Discretized partial differential equations: examples of control systems defined on modules”, Automatica, vol. 10, (1974), 507–515.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • O. Brune, “Synthesis of a finite two-terminal network whose driving-point impedance is a prescribed function of frequency,” J. Math. Phys., vol. 10, (1931), 191–236.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • C.I. Byrnes and T. Duncan, “On certain topological invariants arising in system theory”, in New Directions in Applied Mathematics, P. Hilton and G. Young, Eds., Springer, Heidelberg, 29–71, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • F.M. Callier, and C.D. Nahum, “Necessary and sufficient conditions for the complete controllability and observability of systems in series using the coprime decomposition of a rational matrix”, IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst., vol. 22, (1975), 90–95.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • J.-M. Dion, C. Commault and J. van der Woude, “Generic properties and control of linear structured systems: A survey”, Automatica, vol. 39, (2003), 1125–1144.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • P.A. Fuhrmann, “On controllability and observability of systems connected in parallel”, IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst., vol. 22 (1975), 57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • P.A. Fuhrmann and U. Helmke, “Strict equivalence, controllability and observability of networks of linear systems”, Math. Contr. Signals and Systems, vol. 25, (2013), 437–471.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • E.G. Gilbert, “Controllability and observability in multivariable control systems”, SIAM J. Control Optim., vol. 2, (1963), 128–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Hara, T. Hayakawa and H. Sugata, “LTI systems with generalized frequency variables: A unified framework for homogeneous multi-agent dynamical systems”, SICE J. of Contr. Meas. and System Integration, vol. 2, (2009), 299–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. Hazewinkel and C.F. Martin, “Symmetric linear systems: an application of algebraic systems theory”, Int. J. of Control, vol. 37 (1983), 1371–1384.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • U. Helmke, “Rational functions and Bezout forms: a functorial correspondence”, Linear Algebra Appl., vol. 122–124, (1989), 623–640.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • T.H. Hughes and M.C. Smith, “Algebraic criteria for circuit realizations”, in Mathematical Systems Theory, A Volume in Honor of U. Helmke, (K. Hüper and J. Trumpf; Eds.), CreateSpace, 211–228, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • J.Z. Jiang, and M.C. Smith, “Regular positive-real functions and five-element network synthesis for electrical and mechanical networks”, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, vol. 56(6), (2011), 1275–1290.

    Google Scholar 

  • R.E. Kalman, “Old and new directions of research in system theory”, Perspectives in Mathematical System Theory, Control and Signal Processing, Eds. J.C. Willems, S. Hara, Y. Ohta and H. Fujioka, Springer, vol. 398, 3–13, 2010.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • S. Koshita, M. Abe, and M. Kawamata, “Analysis of second-order modes of linear discrete-time systems under bounded-real transformations”, IEICE Trans. Fundamentals, vol. 90, (2007), 2510–2515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • E.L. Ladenheim, “A synthesis of biquadratic impedances”, M.S. thesis, Polytechnic Institute of Brooklyn, 1948.

    Google Scholar 

  • C.-T. Lin, “Structural controllability”, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, vol. 19 (3), (1974), 201–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Y.Y. Liu, J.-J. Slotine, A.L. Barabasi, “Controllability of complex networks”, Nature, vol. 473 (2011), 167–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Lunze, “Dynamics of strongly coupled symmetric composite systems”, Int. J. Control, vol. 44, (1986), 1617–1640.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • P. Müller, “Primitive monodromy groups of polynomials”, Recent developments in the inverse Galois problem, M. Fried (Ed.), Contemp. Maths. vol. 186, Am. Math. Soc., 385–401, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • C.T. Mullis and R.A. Roberts, “Roundoff noise in digital filters: frequency transformations and invariants”, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Processing, vol. ASSP-24, (1976), 538–550.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • F. Pakovich, “Algebraic curves P(x) − Q(y) = 0 and functional equations”, Complex Var. Elliptic Equ., vol. 56, (2011), 199–213.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • G. Parlangeli and G. Notarstefano, “On the reachability and observability of path and cycle graphs”, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, vol. 57 (2012), 743–748.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • J. F. Ritt, “Prime and composite polynomials”, Trans. Am. Math. Soc., vol. 23(1), (1922), 51–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • H.H. Rosenbrock, State-Space and Multivariable Theory, Wiley, New York, 1970.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • H.H. Rosenbrock and A.C. Pugh, “Contributions to a hierarchical theory of systems”, Int. J. Control, vol. 19, (1974), 845–867.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • M.C. Smith, “Synthesis of mechanical networks: the inerter”, IEEE Trans. Autom. Contr. vol. 47, (2002), 1648–1662.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • E.D. Sontag, “On finitary linear systems”, Kybernetika, vol. 15, (1979), 349–358.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • S. Sundaram and C.N. Hadjicostis, “Control and estimation in finite state multi-agent systems: A finite field approach”, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, vol. 58, (2013), 60–73.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • H.G. Tanner, “On the controllability of nearest neighbor interconnections”, Proc. 43rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Atlantis, Bahamas (2004), 2467–2472.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fuhrmann, P.A., Helmke, U. (2015). Interconnected Systems. In: The Mathematics of Networks of Linear Systems. Universitext. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16646-9_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics