Advertisement

Associations Among Mother–Child Contact, Parenting Stress, and Mother and Child Adjustment Related to Incarceration

  • Heather H. McClure
  • Joann Wu Shortt
  • J. Mark Eddy
  • Alice Holmes
  • Stan Van Uum
  • Evan Russell
  • Gideon Koren
  • Lisa Sheeber
  • Betsy Davis
  • J. Josh Snodgrass
  • Charles R. MartinezJr.
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Psychology book series (BRIEFSPSYCHOL)

Abstract

Contact between incarcerated parents and their children has received increased attention due to potential effects of contact on adult adjustment, adults’ ability to parent their children effectively, and children’s adjustment during and after incarceration. This pilot investigation incorporated self-report and biological measures of stress to examine associations between various forms of mother-child contact, mothers’ cortisol levels derived from hair samples, self-reported parenting stress, and maternal and child adjustment (i.e., emotion dysregulation, depressive and other mental health symptoms). The sample comprised 47 incarcerated mothers with a child between the ages of 4 and 12 years. Mothers were assessed at T1 in prison, at T2 before release, and at T3 6 months after release to examine change and stability over time in mothers’ cortisol and adjustment, associations between mothers’ cortisol and adjustment, and associations between mother-child contact and mothers’ cortisol, adjustment, and recidivism. Caregivers provided reports on children at T1 and T3 to investigate associations among child adjustment, mother-child contact, and maternal stress and adjustment. Mothers’ cortisol levels remained stable in prison and increased significantly after release, which was in contrast to other aspects of mothers’ adjustment such as depressive and mental health symptoms that decreased before release and remained stable after prison. More frequent mother-child contact appeared to be beneficial for maternal stress. In contrast, more mother-child contact was associated with higher child internalizing behavior. Mother-child contact was also related to recidivism. Living with their children before and after incarceration, and more frequent contact after release were associated with a decreased likelihood of detention after release among mothers. At T3 after reunification, higher maternal parenting stress was related to children’s higher internalizing and emotion dysregulation. The implications of the findings are discussed.

Keywords

Children Contact Cortisol Incarceration Mothers Parenting Prison Reunification Stress 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank the mothers and their families and the Oregon Department of Corrections and the Coffee Creek Correctional Facility and their staff members for their participation in this study. Work on this manuscript was supported by the primary grant for this study, Award R34 MH 79911 from the United States Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health (NIH), National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH), as well as by Award 90CA178/1/04 from the United States Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families (ACF), Children’s Bureau, Office of Child Abuse and Neglect. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH, the NIMH, or the ACF.

References

  1. Achenbach, T. M., & Rescorla, L. A. (2001). Manual for ASEBA school-age forms and profiles. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont, Research Center for Children, Youth, and Families.Google Scholar
  2. Bales, W. D., & Mears, D. P. (2008). Inmate social ties and the transition to society: Does visitation reduce recidivism? Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 45, 287–321. doi: 10.1177/0022427808317574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Carlson, J. R. (1998). Evaluating the effectiveness of a live-in nursery within a women’s prison. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 27, 73–85. doi: 10.1300/J076v27n01_06.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cobbina, J. E., & Bender, K. A. (2012). Predicting the future: Incarcerated women’s views of reentry success. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 51, 275–294. doi: 10.1080/10509674.2012.683323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Derogatis, L. R., & Melisaratos, N. (1983). The brief symptom inventory: An introductory report. Psychological Medicine, 13, 595–605. doi: 10.1017/S0033291700048017.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Dettenborn, L., Tietze, A., Bruckner, F., & Kirschbaum, C. (2010). Higher cortisol content in hair among long-term unemployed individuals compared to controls. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 35, 1404–1409. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2010.04.006.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Eddy, J. M., Kjellstrand, J., Martinez, C. R., Jr., & Newton, R. (2010). Theory-based multimodal parenting intervention for incarcerated parents and their families. In J. M. Eddy & J. Poehlmann (Eds.), Children of incarcerated parents: A handbook for researchers and practitioners (pp. 237–261). Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.Google Scholar
  8. Eddy, J. M., Martinez, C. R., Jr., Schiffmann, T., Newton, R., Olin, L., Leve, L., et al. (2008). Development of a multisystemic parent management training intervention for incarcerated parents, their children and families. Clinical Psychologist, 12, 86–98. doi: 10.1080/13284200802495461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Eddy, J. M., Martinez, C. R., Jr., & Burraston, B. (2013). A randomized controlled trial of a parent management training program for incarcerated parents: Proximal impacts. In J. Eddy & J. M. Poehlmann (Eds.), Children of incarcerated parents: Multidisciplinary perspectives on research, intervention, and policy (pp. 108–134). Washington, DC: Urban Institute.Google Scholar
  10. Gibbons, F. X., Etcheverry, P. E., Stock, M. L., Gerrard, M., Weng, C., Kiviniemi, M., et al. (2010). Exploring the link between racial discrimination and substance use: What mediates? What buffers? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 785–801. doi: 10.1037/a0019880.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Gibbons, F. X., Gerrard, M., Cleveland, M. J., Wills, T. A., & Brody, G. H. (2004). Perceived discrimination and substance use in African American parents and their children: A panel study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 517–529. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.86.4.517.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Glaze, L. E., & Maruschak, L. M. (2008). Parents in prison and their minor children (NCJ 222984). Washington, DC: United States Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics. Retrieved from http://bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/pptmc.pdf
  13. Gratz, K. L., & Roemer, L. (2004). Multidimensional assessment of emotion regulation and dysregulation: Development, factor structure, and initial validation of the difficulties in emotion regulation scale. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 26, 41–54. doi: 10.1023/B:JOBA.0000007455.08539.94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Greenfield, L., & Snell, T. (2000). Women offenders (NCJ 175688). Washington, DC: United States Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics. Retrieved from http://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/wo.pdf
  15. Gunnar, M. R., & Donzella, B. (2002). Social regulation of the cortisol levels in early human development. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 27, 199–220. doi: 10.1016/S0306-4530(01)00045-2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Gunnar, M. R., & Vazquez, D. M. (2001). Low cortisol and a flattening of expected daytime rhythm: Potential indices of risk in human development. Developmental Psychopathology, 13, 515–538. doi: 10.1017/S0954579401003066.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hagan, J., & Coleman, J. P. (2001). Returning captives of the American war on drugs: Issues of community and family reentry. Crime and Delinquency, 47, 352–367. doi: 10.1177/0011128701047003004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Haney, C. (2003). The psychological impact of incarceration: Implications for postprison adjustment. In J. Travis & M. Waul (Eds.), The impact of incarceration and reentry on children, families, and communities (pp. 33–66). Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.Google Scholar
  19. Hellhammer, D. H., Wüst, S., & Kudielka, B. M. (2009). Salivary cortisol as a biomarker in stress research. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 34, 163–171. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2008.10.026.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Herman, J. (1992). A new diagnosis. In J. Herman (Ed.), Trauma and recovery (pp. 115–132). New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  21. Holt, N., & Miller, D. (1972). Explorations in inmate-family relationships (Research Report No. 46). Sacramento, CA: California Department of Corrections.Google Scholar
  22. Kalra, S., Einarson, A., Karskov, T., Van Uum, S., & Koren, G. (2007). The relationship between stress and hair cortisol in healthy pregnant women. Clinical and Investigative Medicine, 30, E103–E107.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Kjellstrand, J. M., Cearley, J., Eddy, J. M., Foney, D., & Martinez, C. R., Jr. (2012). Characteristics of incarcerated fathers and mothers: Implications for preventive interventions targeting children and families. Children and Youth Services Review, 34, 2409–2415. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2012.08.008.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Kjellstrand, J. M., & Eddy, J. M. (2011a). Parental incarceration during childhood, family context, and youth problem behavior across adolescence. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 50, 18–36. doi: 10.1080/10509674.2011.536720.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Kjellstrand, J. M., & Eddy, J. M. (2011b). Mediators of the effect of parental incarceration on adolescent externalizing behaviors. Journal of Community Psychology, 39, 551–565. doi: 10.1002/jcop.20451.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Masten, A., & Garmezy, N. (1985). Risk, vulnerability, and protective factors in developmental psychopathology. In B. Lahey & A. Kazdin (Eds.), Advances in clinical child psychology (pp. 1–52). New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. McEwen, B. S., & Wingfield, J. (2003). The concept of allostatis in biology and biomedicine. Hormones and Behavior, 43, 2–15. doi: 10.1016/S0018-506X(02)00024-7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. McMahon, R. J., & Lengua, L. (1996). Being a parent (Technical Report) [On-line]. Retrieved from http://www.fasttrackproject.org/
  29. Minnesota Department of Corrections. (2011). The effects of prison visitation on offender recidivism (Research Report). St. Paul, MN. Retrieved from http://www.doc.state.mn.us/pages/files/large-files/Publications/11-11MNPrisonVisitationStudy.pdf
  30. Murray, J., Farrington, D. P., & Sekol, I. (2012). Children’s antisocial behavior, mental health, drug use, and educational performance after parental incarceration: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 138, 175–210. doi: 10.1037/a0026407.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Peat, B., & Winfree, T. (1992). Reducing the intra-institutional effects of ‘prisonization’: A study of a therapeutic community for drug-using inmates. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 19, 206–225. doi: 10.1177/0093854892019002007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pereg, D., Gow, R., Mosseri, M., Lishner, M., Rieder, M., Van Uum, S., et al. (2010). Hair cortisol and the risk for acute myocardial infarction in adult men. Stress, 14, 73–81. doi: 10.1037/a0026407.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Poehlmann, J. (2005). Incarcerated mother’s contact with children, perceived family relationships, and depressive symptoms. Journal of Family Psychology, 19, 350–357. doi: 10.1037/0893-3200.19.3.350.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Poehlmann, J., Dallaire, D., Loper, A. B., & Shear, L. D. (2010). Children’s contact with their incarcerated parents: Research findings and recommendations. American Psychologist, 65, 575–598. doi: 10.1037/a0020279.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Poehlmann, J., & Eddy, J. M. (Eds.) (2013). Relationship processes and resilience in children with incarcerated parents. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, Serial No. 308. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  36. Radloff, L. S. (1977). The CES-D scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 385–401. doi: 10.1177/014662167700100306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rosmond, R. (2001). Visceral obesity and the metabolic syndrome. In P. Björntorp (Ed.), The international textbook of obesity (pp. 339–350). Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  38. Russell, E., Koren, G., Rieder, M., & Van Uum, S. (2012). Hair cortisol as a biological marker of chronic stress: Current status, future directions and unanswered questions. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 37, 589–601. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2011.09.009.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. San Francisco Partnership for Incarcerated Parents. (2003a). Panel discussion on the rights and needs of the children of incarcerated parents. San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
  40. San Francisco Partnership for Incarcerated Parents (2003b). Children of incarcerated parents: A bill of rights. San Franciso, CA.Google Scholar
  41. Sapolsky, R. M. (2004). Social status and health in humans and other animals. Annual Review of Anthropology, 33, 393–418. doi: 10.1146/annurev.anthro.33.070203.144000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sapolsky, R. M., Romero, L. M., & Munck, A. U. (2000). How do glucocorticoids influence stress responses? Integrating permissive, suppressive, stimulatory, and preparative actions. Endocrine Reviews, 21, 55–89.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Schiffmann, T. J., Eddy, J. M., Martinez, C. R., Jr., Leve, L., & Newton, R. (2008). Parenting inside out: Parent management training for incarcerated parents in prison. Portland, OR: Oregon Social Learning Center and Children’s Justice Alliance.Google Scholar
  44. Shields, A., & Cicchetti, D. (1997). Emotion regulation among school-age children: The development and validation of a new criterion Q-sort scale. Developmental Psychology, 33, 906–916. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.33.6.906.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Shortt, J. W., Eddy, J. M., Sheeber, L., & Davis, B. (2014). Project Home: A pilot evaluation of an emotion-focused intervention for mothers reuniting with children after prison. Psychological Services, 11, 1–9. doi: 10.1037/a0034323.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Steudte, S., Stalder, T., Dettenborn, L., Klumbies, E., Foley, P., Beesdo-Baum, K., et al. (2011). Decreased hair cortisol concentrations in generalised anxiety disorder. Psychiatry Research, 186, 310–314. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2010.09.002.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Thomson, S., Koren, G., Fraser, L. A., Rieder, M., Friedman, T. C., & Van Uum, S. H. M. (2010). Hair analysis provides a historical record of cortisol levels in Cushing’s syndrome. Experimental and Clinical Endocrinology and Diabetes, 118, 133–138. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1220771.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Travis, J., & Waul, M. (Eds.). (2003). The impact of incarceration and reentry on children, families, and communities. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.Google Scholar
  49. Van Uum, S. H., Sauve, B., Fraser, L. A., Morley-Forster, P., Paul, T. L., & Koren, G. (2008). Elevated content of cortisol in hair of patients with severe chronic pain: A novel biomarker for stress. Stress, 11, 483–488. doi: 10.1080/10253890801887388.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Walker, H. M., & McConnell, S. (1995). The Walker-McConnell scale of social competence and school adjustment. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.Google Scholar
  51. West, H. C., & Sabol, W. (2008). Prisoners in 2007 (NCJ 224280). Washington, DC: United States Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics. Retrieved from http://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/p07.pdf
  52. Williams, D. R., & Mohammed, S. A. (2009). Discrimination and racial disparities in health: Evidence and needed research. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 32, 20–47. doi: 10.1007/s10865-008-9185-0.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Yamada, J., Stevens, B., de Silva, N., Gibbins, S., Beyene, J., Taddio, A., et al. (2007). Hair cortisol as a potential biologic marker of chronic stress in hospitalized neonates. Neonatology, 92, 42–49. doi: 10.1159/000100085.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Heather H. McClure
    • 1
  • Joann Wu Shortt
    • 2
  • J. Mark Eddy
    • 3
  • Alice Holmes
    • 2
  • Stan Van Uum
    • 4
  • Evan Russell
    • 4
  • Gideon Koren
    • 5
  • Lisa Sheeber
    • 6
  • Betsy Davis
    • 6
  • J. Josh Snodgrass
    • 7
  • Charles R. MartinezJr.
    • 1
    • 8
  1. 1.Center for Equity PromotionUniversity of OregonEugeneUSA
  2. 2.Oregon Social Learning CenterEugeneUSA
  3. 3.Partners for Our Children, School of Social WorkUniversity of WashingtonSeattleUSA
  4. 4.Department of MedicineWestern UniversityLondonCanada
  5. 5.The Ivey Chair in Molecular ToxicologyWestern UniversityLondonCanada
  6. 6.Oregon Research InstituteEugeneUSA
  7. 7.Department of AnthropologyUniversity of OregonEugeneUSA
  8. 8.Department of Educational Methodology, Policy and LeadershipUniversity of OregonEugeneUSA

Personalised recommendations