Abstract
The following excerpts reflect a set of values and assumptions about instructional design as a scholarship and a practice. However, one of them is not like the others.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Merrill, in Zemke & Rossett, 2002, 30.
- 2.
Retrieved October 11, 2014, from http://www.draftcountdown.com/forum/showthread.php?s=c78d7734383302b65fea8db29ddb8676&p=1965425#post1965425
- 3.
For example, US Air Force Human Resources Lab, Navy Personnel Research and Development Center, US Air Force, US Department of Defense, the Navy Project, NATO Advanced Study Institute, NATO Advanced Research Workshop.
- 4.
In 2013, the median weekly earnings for women in full-time management, professional, and related occupations were $973, compared to $1,349 for men.
- 5.
This may be partly because women tend to cluster in lower-paying fields. The most-educated swath of women, for example, gravitates toward the teaching and nursing fields. Men with comparable education become business executives, scientists, doctors, and lawyers—jobs that pay significantly more. Times, April 20, 2011.
References
Academy of Achievement. (1995). Interview of Frank Gehry. Willamsburg, VA. Retrieved from http://www.achievement.org/autodoc/page/geh0int-1
Bardzell, S. (2010). Feminist HCI: Taking stock and outlining an agenda for design. Paper presented at CHI 2010, Atlanta, GA.
Boling, E., Easterling, W., Hardre, P., Howard, C., & Roman, T. (2011). ADDIE: Perspectives in transition. Educational Technology, 51(5), 34–38.
Boling, E., & Smith, K.M. (2009). Design tensions: Adapting a signature pedagogy into instructional design education. Paper presented at the meeting of American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
Boling, E., & Smith, K. (2010). Intensive studio experience in a non-studio masters program: Student activities and thinking across levels of design. Design and complexity: Design Research Society Conference 2010; School of Industrial Design, Montreal (QC), Canada.
Campbell, K., Schwier, R. A., & Kenny, R. (2010). Agency of the instructional designer: Moral coherence and transformative social practice. In J. Willis (Ed.), Constructivist instructional design (C-ID) (pp. 243–264). Charlotte, VA: Information Age.
Catalyst. (2014). Catalyst quick take: Women’s earnings and income (p. 2014). New York: Catalyst.
Charmaz, K. (2005). Grounded theory in the 21st century: Applications for advancing social justice research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 507–535). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Christians, C. G. (2000). Ethics and politics in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 133–155). London: Sage.
Clark, R. C. (2002). Applying cognitive strategies to instructional design. Performance Improvement, 41(7), 10–16.
Cross, N. (1999). Design research: A disciplined conversation. Design Issues, 15(2), 5–10.
Cross, N. (2007). Designerly ways of knowing. London: Springer.
Coffey, A. (1999). The Ethnographic Self: Fieldwork and the Representation of Identity. Sage.
Denzin, N. K. (1989). Interpretive Biography (Qualitative Research Methods Series, 17. Sage.
Duffy, T. M., & Jonassen, D. H. (1992). Constructivism: New implications for instructional technology. In T. Duffy & D. Jonassen (Eds.), Constructivism and the technology of instruction (pp. 1–16). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Eisner, E. W. (1981). On the differences between scientific and artistic approaches to qualitative research. Educational Researcher, 10(4), 5–9.
Ellis, C., & Bochner, A. (2000). Autoethnography, personal narrative, reflexivity: Researcher as subject. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 733–768). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Fleming, C., & Fullagar, S. (2007). Reflexive methodologies: An autoethnography of the gendered performance of sport/management. Annals of Leisure Research, 10(3/4), 238–256.
Flood, M. (2001). Bringing men into the light? Women’s Studies and the problem of men. Paper presented to Casting New Shadows: Australian Women’s Studies Association Conference, Sydney, AU.
Garber, M. (1999). Academic instincts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Gee, J. P. (1996). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses (2nd ed.). London: Taylor & Francis.
Gibbons, A. S., & Yanchar, S. C. (2010). An alternative view of the instructional design process. Educational Technology, 50(4), 16–26.
Gubrium, E., & Koro-Ljungberg, M. (2005). Contending with border making in the social constructionist interview. Qualitative Inquiry, 11(5), 689–715.
Haraway, D. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575–599.
Haraway, D. (1991). Simians, cyborgs and women: The reinvention of nature. London: Free Association Books.
Harding, S. G. (2004). Feminist standpoint theory: Intellectual and political controversies. New York: Psychology Press.
Herring, S. C., Ogan, C., Ahuja, M., & Robinson, J. C. (2006). Gender and the culture of computing in applied IT education. In E. Trauth (Ed.), Encyclopedia of gender and information technology. Hershey, PA: Information Science. Preprint: http://ella.slis.indiana.edu/~herring/gite.pdf.
Hill, C., Corbett, C., & St. Rose, C. (2013). Why so few? Women in science, technology, engineering and technology. Washington, DC: American Association of University Women.
Hongladarom, S. (2001). Cultures and global justice. In W. Sriwarakuel, M. B. Dy, J. Haryatmoko, N. Y. Chuang, & C. Yiheang (Eds.), Cultural traditions and contemporary challenges in Southeast Asia: Hindu and Buddhist (pp. 313-326), Council for Research in Values, Cultural Heritage and Contemporary Change Series IIID, Volume 3.
Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy IEP. Feminist Standpoint Theory. Retrieved June 2, 2014, from http://www.iep.utm.edu/fem-stan/
Lapadat, J. C., Black, N. E., Clark, P. G., Gremm, R. M., Karanja, R. W., Mieke, M., et al. (2010). Life challenge memory work: Using collaborative autobiography to understand ourselves. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 9(1), 78–104.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Denzin, N. K. (1994). The fifth moment. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The handbook of qualitative research (1st ed., pp. 575–586). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Luke, C. (1992). Feminist politics in radical pedagogy. In C. Luke & J. Gore (Eds.), Feminisms and critical pedagogy. New York: Routledge.
Martimianakis, M. A. (2008). Reconciling competing discourses: The University of Toronto’s equity and diversity framework. In A. Wagner, S. Acker, & K. Mayuzumi (Eds.), Whose university is it, anyway? Power and privilege on gendered terrain (pp. 44–60). Toronto, ON: Sumach Press.
McDowell, L. (2007). Gender, identity and place: Understanding feminist geographies. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
McCarthy, J. J., & Prince, A. (1995). Faithfulness and reduplicative identity. In J. Beckman, L. W. Dickey, & S. Urbanczyk (Eds.), Papers in optimality theory: University of massachusetts occasional papers 18 (pp. 249–384). Amherst, Mass: Graduate Linguistic Student Association.
Merrill, D., Drake, L., Lacy, M. J., & Pratt, J. (1996). Reclaiming instructional design. Educational Technology, 36(5), 5–7.
Morgan, D. (1992). Discovering men. London: Routledge.
Nelson, H. L. (2001). Damaged identities: Narrative repair. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Nieusma, D. (2004). Alternative design scholarship: Working toward appropriate design. Design Issues, 20(3), 13–24.
Nordin-Hultman, E. (2004). Pedagogical miljöer och barns subjektsskapande [The pedagogical environment and the construction of children’s subjectivity]. Stockholm: Liber.
Ogan, C., Robinson, J. C., Ahuja, M., & Herring, S. C. (2006). Gender differences among students in computer science and applied information technology. In W. Aspray & J. McGrath Cohoon (Eds.), Women and information technology: Research on the reasons for under-representation (pp. 279–300). Cambridge: MIT Press. Preprint: http://ella.slis.indiana.edu/~herring/ogan.2006.pdf.
Orner, M. (1992). Interrupting the calls for student voice in “liberatory” education: A feminist poststructuralist perspective. In C. Luke & J. Gore (Eds.), Feminisms and critical pedagogy (pp. 74–89). New York: Routledge.
Pagnotta, B. (2013). AD classics: The Guggenheim Museum Bilbao/Frank Gehry. ArchDaily. Retrieved November 6, 2014, from http://www.archdaily.com/p=422470
Reed-Danahay, D. (1997). Auto/ethnography. New York: Berg.
Reigeluth, C. M. (Ed.). (1999). Instructional design theories and models, volume II: A new paradigm of instructional theory. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc.
Rothschild, J. (Ed.). (1999). Design and feminism: Re-visioning spaces, places and everyday things. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Simons, P. (2014, May 28). Who should guard the guardians? Professions that self-regulate must earn public trust. Edmonton Journal. Retrieved June 1, 2014.
Sparkes, A. C. (2002). Autoethnography: Self-indulgence or something more? In A. Bochner & C. Ellis (Eds.), Ethnographically speaking: Autoethnography, literature, and aesthetics. New York: AltaMira.
Statistics Canada, Table 282-0072: Labour Force Survey Estimates (LFS), Wages of Employees by Type of Work, North American Industry Classification System (NAICS), Sex and Age Group, “CANSIM (2014).
Stanley, L. (1993). On auto/biography in sociology. Sociology (27), 41–52.
Storrs, D., & Mihelich, J. (1998). Beyond essentialisms: Team teaching gender and sexuality. NWSA Journal, 10(1), 98–118.
Sullivan, R. (2014, October). All about Ives. Vogue, 204(10). Online version.
Taguchi, H. L. (2005). Getting personal: How early childhood teacher education troubles students’ and teacher educators identities regarding subjectivity and feminism. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood Education, 6(3), 244-255.
Tracey, M. W., & Boling, E. (2013). Preparing instructional designers: Traditional and emerging perspectives. In J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. Elen, & M. J. Bishop (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (4th ed., pp 653-659). New York: Springer.
Tracey, M. W., & Hutchinson, A. (2013). Developing designer identity through reflection. Educational Technology, 53(3), 28–32.
Tracey, M. W., Hutchinson, A., & Quinn Gryzbyk, T. (2014). Instructional designers as reflective practitioners: Developing professional Identity through reflection. Educational Technology Research & Development, 62(3), 315–334.
Trynauer, M. (2010, August). Architecture in the age of Gehry. Vanity Fair. Retrieved November 6, 2014, from http://www.vanityfair.com/culture/features/2010/08/architecture-survey-201008
Turkle, S. (1997). Life on the screen: Identity in the age of the internet. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Verbeek, P. P. (2006). Materializing morality: Design ethics and technological mediation. Science, Technology & Human Values, 31(3), 361–380. doi:10.1177/0162243905285847.
Vrasidas, C. (2000). Constructivism versus objectivism: Implications for interaction, course design, and evaluation in distance education. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 6(4), 339–362.
Weedon, C. (1997). Feminist practice and poststructuralist theory (2nd ed.). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Zazar, K.M. (2004). Design precedents and identity: The exercises. Paper presented at the 8th annual Generative Art Conference, Milan, Italy.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Campbell, K. (2015). The Feminist Instructional Designer: An Autoethnography. In: Hokanson, B., Clinton, G., Tracey, M. (eds) The Design of Learning Experience. Educational Communications and Technology: Issues and Innovations. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16504-2_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16504-2_16
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-16503-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-16504-2
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)