Skip to main content

e-Health Informed Foreign Patient and Physician Communication: The Perspective of Informed Consent

  • Conference paper
Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering (IWBBIO 2015)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNBI,volume 9044))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 3070 Accesses

Abstract

The rapidly growth of mobility population of exchange students, foreign workers, and tourists raises the communication challenge of foreign patient-physician communication in local hospitals (clinics). Language is not the only one skill during a medical visit, health literacy is another important skill used to understand the medical information delivered by doctors. Skills in understanding and applying information about health issues are critical to the process of patient-physician communication and may have substantial impact on health behaviors and health outcomes.

In recent years, the practice of foreigners using mobile apps to search map for location, access transportation information, and lookup translation, have increased steadily. However, the current mobile apps can’t support foreigners for their sudden needs of hospital visits. Take into consideration of language barrier and low health literacy issue, an Internet health information-based patient-centered mobile system, is suggested to mediate the informed consent process of patient-physician communication. Thus, this research aims to enhance foreign visitors’ capabilities in communication during exchange information with local foreign doctors by developing an effective patient-physician communication mobile system. Based on four case studies of patients’ hospital visit experiences in Europe and Asia and their perception toward using the media-mediated communication. We concluded that 1) e-health informed foreign patients’ language skill and health literacy were improved in compare with non-Internet-informed patients group; 2) e-health informed patients’ states of anxiety were reduced; 3) their satisfaction of medical visit were improved; and 4) the process of informed consent was standardized into six parts (Symptom description, Disease judgment, Disease diagnosis, Examination, Treatment, and Healthcare education) for general foreign patient communications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ishikawa, H., Takeuchi, T., Yano, E.: Measuring functional, communicative, and critical health literacy among diabetic patients. Diabetes Care 31(5), 874–880 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ishikawa, H., Kiuchi, T.: Health literacy and health communication. BioPsychoSocial Medicine 4(18), 1–5 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bianchi, R., Schiavotto, D., Svoboda, D.: Why companies should care about e-care. McKinsey&Company (2014), http://www.mckinsey.com/insights/marketing_sales/why_companies_should_care_about_ecare (accessed)

  4. Fujioka, Y., Stewart, E.: How do physicians discuss e-Health with patients? The relationship of physicians’ e-Health beliefs to physician mediation styles. Health Communications 28, 317–328 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. HIMSS SIG develops proposed e-health definition. HIMSS News 13(7), 12 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Nutbeam, D.: Health literacy as a public health goal: A challenge for contemporary health education and communication strategies into the 21st century. Health Promotion International 15(3), 259–267 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bansil, P., Keenan, N.L., Zlot, A.I., Gilliland, J.C.: Health- related information on the web: Results from the HealthStyles sur- vey, 2002–2003. Preventing Chronic Disease: Public Health Research, Practice, and Policy 3(2), 1–10 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cotten, S.R., Gupta, S.S.: Characteristics of online and offline health information seekers and factors that discriminate between them. Social Science & Medicine 59, 1795–1806 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fox, S.: Pew Internet and American Life Project: The social life of health information (2011), http://pewinternet.org/reports/2011/social-life-of-health-info/summary-of-findings.Aspx , archived at http://www.Webcitation.Org/61imndlxs

  10. Dedding, C., van Doorn, R., Winkler, L., Reis, R.: How will e-health affect patient participation in the clinic? A review of e-health studies and the current evidence for changes in the relationship between medical professionals and patients. Social Science & Medicine 72, 49–53 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sommerhalder, K., Abraham, A., Zufferey, M., Barth, J., Abel, T.: Internet information and medical consultations: Experiences from patients’ and physicians’ perspectives. Patient Education and Counseling 77, 266–271 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Potter, S.J., McKinlay, J.B.: From a relationship to encounter: An examination of longitudinal and lateral dimensions in the doctor–patient relationship. Social Science & Medicine 61, 465–479 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. McMullan, M.: Patients using the Internet to obtain health information: How this affects the patient–health professional relationship. Patient Education and Counseling 63, 24–28 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Meredith, K.L., Jeffe, D.B., Mundy, L.M., Fraser, V.J.: Sources influencing patients in their HIV medication decisions. Health Education & Behavior 28, 40–50 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Nathanson, A.I.: Parent and child perspectives on the presence and meaning of parental television mediation. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 45, 201–220 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Valkenburg, P.M., Kremar, M., Peeters, A.L., Marseille, N.M.: Developing a scale to assess three styles of television mediation: “Instructive mediation,” “restrictive mediation,” and “social coviewing. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 43, 52–66 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ahmad, F., Hudak, P.L., Bercovith, K., Hollenberg, E., Levinson, W.: Are physicians ready for patients with Internet-based health information? Journal of Medical Internet Research 8, e22 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Akesson, K., Saveman, B.I., Nilsson, G.: Health care consumers’ experiences of information communication technology—A summary of literature. International Journal of Medical Informatics 76, 633–645 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Urquhart, C., Lehmann, H., Myers, M.D.: Putting the theory back into grounded theory: Guidelines for grounded theory studies in information systems. Information System Journal 20, 357–381 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Huang, E., Liao, SF., Chen, SL. (2015). e-Health Informed Foreign Patient and Physician Communication: The Perspective of Informed Consent. In: Ortuño, F., Rojas, I. (eds) Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering. IWBBIO 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9044. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16480-9_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16480-9_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-16479-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-16480-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics