Skip to main content

Institutions and Planning: A Reflection from Disaster Management Planning in Indonesia

  • Chapter
Book cover Global Sustainability

Abstract

Good governance has been used in planning practices, including disaster management planning in Indonesia. The authors are not aware of any published research that discusses the nexus of institutions and planning in the context of disaster management. This article argues that this is a gap that should be filled because studying planning institutions will help us understand governance processes in disaster management. The argument builds from the 6-month experiences of both authors as planning consultants for the RPB disaster management planning project in nine Indonesian provinces between August and December 2011. The regulations, actors, and organizational resources are used to analyze disaster management planning institutions. Overall, the study found (i) that the regulation of development planning and budgeting did not directly consider the disaster management planning output; (ii) that the knowledge gap between national and provincial government bodies occurred owing to limited experience in conducting disaster management planning at the meso-level; and (iii) that there was a significant lack of organizational resources in conducting more inclusive disaster management planning at the subnational level. These findings suggest that the current setup – where disaster management planning has been mainstreamed into the development planning process – is insufficient to address the governance challenges posed by disasters. The findings also suggest that more effective governance in disaster management planning is likely to be achieved by enhancing planning institutions through the vertical and horizontal integration of government institutions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Hyogo Framework for Action is a worldwide agreement on disaster risk reduction whose aim is to promote a strategic and systematic approach to reducing vulnerabilities and risks to hazards. It is signed at The World Conference on Disaster Reduction in Kobe, Hyogo, Japan which was held from 18 to 22 January 2005.

Abbreviations

Bakornas PB:

Badan Koordinasi Nasional Penanggulangan Bencana or National Coordinating Agency for Disaster Management

Bappeda:

Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Daerah or Local Development Planning Agency

BNPB:

Badan Nasional Penanggulangan Bencana or National Agency for Disaster Management

BPBD:

Badan Penanggulangan Bencana Daerah or Local Agency for Disaster Management

CSR:

Corporate social responsibility

DIY:

Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta province

DRR:

Disaster risk reduction

FGD:

Focus group discussion

HFA:

Hyogo framework for action

NGO:

Nongovernmental organization

NTB:

Nusa Tenggara Barat province

NTT:

Nusa Tenggara Timur province

Perka BNPB:

Peraturan Kepala BNPB or Head Regulation of BNPB

Perpres:

Peraturan Presiden or President Regulation

PP:

Peraturan Pemerintah or Government Regulation

RA-PB:

Rencana Aksi Penanggulangan Bencana or Disaster Management Action Planning

Renstra:

Rencana Strategis or Strategic Plan

RKP:

Rencana Kerja Pemerintah or Short-term Development Plan

RPB:

Rencana Penanggulangan Bencana or Disaster Management Planning

RPJM:

Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Menengah or Mid-term Development Plan

RPJP:

Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Panjang or Long-term Development Plan

RTRW:

Rencana Tata Ruang Wilayah or Spatial Planning

UNDP:

United Nations Development Programme

UNISDR:

United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction

References

  • AECOM. (2010). Climate design: Design and planning for the age of climate change. Singapore: ORO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, E. A. (2007). Institutionalist perspectives on planning: Why? Where? How? In N. Verma (Ed.), Institutions and planning (Series: Current research in urban and regional studies, pp. 37–60). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth, P. (2005). The nature of difference: Traditions of law and government and their effects on planning in Britain and France. In B. Sanyal (Ed.), Comparative planning cultures (pp. 259–284). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunnengraeber, A., Dietz, K., Hirschl, B., & Walk, H. (2006). Interdisciplinarity in governance research (GARNET Working Paper: No 08/06). Berlin: Freie Universität Berlin. Available from http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/garnet/workingpapers/0806.pdf

  • Dolowitz, D., & Marsh, D. (1996). Who learns what from whom: A review of the policy transfer literature. Political Studies, 44(2), 343–357. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb00334.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garatwa, W., & Bollin, C. (2002). Disaster risk management: Working concept. Eschborn: GTZ. Available from http://www2.gtz.de/dokumente/bib/02-5001.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of Indonesia. (2004). Act no. 25/2004 regarding national development planning system. Jakarta: Government of Indonesia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of Indonesia. (2007a). Act no. 24/2007 regarding disaster risk management. Jakarta: Government of Indonesia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of Indonesia. (2007b). Act no. 26/2007 regarding spatial management. Jakarta: Government of Indonesia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of Indonesia. (2007c). Government regulation no. 38/2007 regarding distribution of governmental affairs between central government, provincial government and local government. Jakarta: Government of Indonesia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of Indonesia. (2008a). President regulation no. 8/2008 regarding National Board for Disaster Management. Jakarta: Government of Indonesia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of Indonesia. (2008b). Government regulation no. 21/2008 regarding operation of disaster management. Jakarta: Government of Indonesia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of Indonesia. (2008c). Regulation of BNPB Chief no. 4/2008 regarding the guideline for disaster management planning. Jakarta: Government of Indonesia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of Indonesia. (2010). Government regulation no. 15/2010 regarding implementation of spatial planning. Jakarta: Government of Indonesia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gualini, E. (2001). Planning and the intelligence of institutions: Interactive approaches to territorial policy-making between institutional design and institution-building. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Healey, P. (1997). Collaborative planning: Shaping places in fragmented societies. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Healey, P., & Williams, R. (1993). European urban planning systems: Diversity and convergence. Urban Studies, 30(4–5), 701–720. doi:10.1080/00420989320081881.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Working Group II. (2001). Climate change 2001: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. GRID-Arendal. http://www.grida.no/publications/other/ipcc_tar/?src=/climate/ipcc_tar/?wg2/301.htm. Accessed 11 Sept 2012.

  • Irawan. (2011). Disaster management plan and mid-term development plan: Position of RPB. Presented on formulation of disaster management planning workshop at Millennium Hotel, Jakarta, October 28, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan, H., Vasilescu, L. G., & Khan, A. (2008). Disaster management cycle – A theoretical approach. Management and Marketing Journal, 6(1), 43–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lassa, J. (2011). Institutional vulnerability and governance of disaster risk reduction: Macro, meso and micro scale assessment (With case studies from Indonesia). Ph.D. thesis, Bonn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayntz, R. (2003). New challenges to governance theory. In H. Bang (Ed.), Governance as social and political communication (pp. 27–40). Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, S. (2011). Social institutions. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Last update February 8, 2011. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2012/entries/social-institutions/. Accessed 30 Oct 2012.

  • Sanyal, B. (Ed.). (2005). Comparative planning cultures. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sperling, F., & Szekely, F. (2005). Disaster risk management in a changing climate. Discussion paper prepared for the world conference on disaster reduction on behalf of the Vulnerability and Adaptation Resource Group (VARG). Reprint with Addendum on conference outcomes, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). (2004). Reducing disaster risk: A challenge for development a global report. New York: Bureau for Crisis Prevention and Recovery, United Nations Development Program.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNISDR). (2011). Global assessment report on disaster risk reduction: Revealing risk, redefining development. Geneva: UNISDR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venton, P., & Hansford, B. (2006). Reducing risk of disaster in our communities. Teddington: Tearfund. http://tilz.tearfund.org/~/media/Files/TILZ/Publications/ROOTS/English/Disaster/ROOTS%209%20-%202006%20version/Disaster%20risk%20reduction%20-%20full.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Work, R. (2002). The role of participation and partnership in decentralised governance: A brief synthesis of policy lessons and recommendations of nine country case studies on service delivery for the poor. New York: UNDP. http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/un/unpan006230.pdf. Accessed 25 Oct 2011.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hendricus A. Simarmata .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Simarmata, H.A., Suryandaru, R.W. (2015). Institutions and Planning: A Reflection from Disaster Management Planning in Indonesia. In: Werlen, B. (eds) Global Sustainability. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16477-9_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics