Abstract
Good governance has been used in planning practices, including disaster management planning in Indonesia. The authors are not aware of any published research that discusses the nexus of institutions and planning in the context of disaster management. This article argues that this is a gap that should be filled because studying planning institutions will help us understand governance processes in disaster management. The argument builds from the 6-month experiences of both authors as planning consultants for the RPB disaster management planning project in nine Indonesian provinces between August and December 2011. The regulations, actors, and organizational resources are used to analyze disaster management planning institutions. Overall, the study found (i) that the regulation of development planning and budgeting did not directly consider the disaster management planning output; (ii) that the knowledge gap between national and provincial government bodies occurred owing to limited experience in conducting disaster management planning at the meso-level; and (iii) that there was a significant lack of organizational resources in conducting more inclusive disaster management planning at the subnational level. These findings suggest that the current setup – where disaster management planning has been mainstreamed into the development planning process – is insufficient to address the governance challenges posed by disasters. The findings also suggest that more effective governance in disaster management planning is likely to be achieved by enhancing planning institutions through the vertical and horizontal integration of government institutions.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Hyogo Framework for Action is a worldwide agreement on disaster risk reduction whose aim is to promote a strategic and systematic approach to reducing vulnerabilities and risks to hazards. It is signed at The World Conference on Disaster Reduction in Kobe, Hyogo, Japan which was held from 18 to 22 January 2005.
Abbreviations
- Bakornas PB:
-
Badan Koordinasi Nasional Penanggulangan Bencana or National Coordinating Agency for Disaster Management
- Bappeda:
-
Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Daerah or Local Development Planning Agency
- BNPB:
-
Badan Nasional Penanggulangan Bencana or National Agency for Disaster Management
- BPBD:
-
Badan Penanggulangan Bencana Daerah or Local Agency for Disaster Management
- CSR:
-
Corporate social responsibility
- DIY:
-
Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta province
- DRR:
-
Disaster risk reduction
- FGD:
-
Focus group discussion
- HFA:
-
Hyogo framework for action
- NGO:
-
Nongovernmental organization
- NTB:
-
Nusa Tenggara Barat province
- NTT:
-
Nusa Tenggara Timur province
- Perka BNPB:
-
Peraturan Kepala BNPB or Head Regulation of BNPB
- Perpres:
-
Peraturan Presiden or President Regulation
- PP:
-
Peraturan Pemerintah or Government Regulation
- RA-PB:
-
Rencana Aksi Penanggulangan Bencana or Disaster Management Action Planning
- Renstra:
-
Rencana Strategis or Strategic Plan
- RKP:
-
Rencana Kerja Pemerintah or Short-term Development Plan
- RPB:
-
Rencana Penanggulangan Bencana or Disaster Management Planning
- RPJM:
-
Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Menengah or Mid-term Development Plan
- RPJP:
-
Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Panjang or Long-term Development Plan
- RTRW:
-
Rencana Tata Ruang Wilayah or Spatial Planning
- UNDP:
-
United Nations Development Programme
- UNISDR:
-
United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction
References
AECOM. (2010). Climate design: Design and planning for the age of climate change. Singapore: ORO.
Alexander, E. A. (2007). Institutionalist perspectives on planning: Why? Where? How? In N. Verma (Ed.), Institutions and planning (Series: Current research in urban and regional studies, pp. 37–60). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Booth, P. (2005). The nature of difference: Traditions of law and government and their effects on planning in Britain and France. In B. Sanyal (Ed.), Comparative planning cultures (pp. 259–284). New York: Routledge.
Brunnengraeber, A., Dietz, K., Hirschl, B., & Walk, H. (2006). Interdisciplinarity in governance research (GARNET Working Paper: No 08/06). Berlin: Freie Universität Berlin. Available from http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/garnet/workingpapers/0806.pdf
Dolowitz, D., & Marsh, D. (1996). Who learns what from whom: A review of the policy transfer literature. Political Studies, 44(2), 343–357. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb00334.x.
Garatwa, W., & Bollin, C. (2002). Disaster risk management: Working concept. Eschborn: GTZ. Available from http://www2.gtz.de/dokumente/bib/02-5001.pdf.
Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Government of Indonesia. (2004). Act no. 25/2004 regarding national development planning system. Jakarta: Government of Indonesia.
Government of Indonesia. (2007a). Act no. 24/2007 regarding disaster risk management. Jakarta: Government of Indonesia.
Government of Indonesia. (2007b). Act no. 26/2007 regarding spatial management. Jakarta: Government of Indonesia.
Government of Indonesia. (2007c). Government regulation no. 38/2007 regarding distribution of governmental affairs between central government, provincial government and local government. Jakarta: Government of Indonesia.
Government of Indonesia. (2008a). President regulation no. 8/2008 regarding National Board for Disaster Management. Jakarta: Government of Indonesia.
Government of Indonesia. (2008b). Government regulation no. 21/2008 regarding operation of disaster management. Jakarta: Government of Indonesia.
Government of Indonesia. (2008c). Regulation of BNPB Chief no. 4/2008 regarding the guideline for disaster management planning. Jakarta: Government of Indonesia.
Government of Indonesia. (2010). Government regulation no. 15/2010 regarding implementation of spatial planning. Jakarta: Government of Indonesia.
Gualini, E. (2001). Planning and the intelligence of institutions: Interactive approaches to territorial policy-making between institutional design and institution-building. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Healey, P. (1997). Collaborative planning: Shaping places in fragmented societies. London: Macmillan.
Healey, P., & Williams, R. (1993). European urban planning systems: Diversity and convergence. Urban Studies, 30(4–5), 701–720. doi:10.1080/00420989320081881.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Working Group II. (2001). Climate change 2001: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. GRID-Arendal. http://www.grida.no/publications/other/ipcc_tar/?src=/climate/ipcc_tar/?wg2/301.htm. Accessed 11 Sept 2012.
Irawan. (2011). Disaster management plan and mid-term development plan: Position of RPB. Presented on formulation of disaster management planning workshop at Millennium Hotel, Jakarta, October 28, 2011.
Khan, H., Vasilescu, L. G., & Khan, A. (2008). Disaster management cycle – A theoretical approach. Management and Marketing Journal, 6(1), 43–50.
Lassa, J. (2011). Institutional vulnerability and governance of disaster risk reduction: Macro, meso and micro scale assessment (With case studies from Indonesia). Ph.D. thesis, Bonn.
Mayntz, R. (2003). New challenges to governance theory. In H. Bang (Ed.), Governance as social and political communication (pp. 27–40). Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Miller, S. (2011). Social institutions. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Last update February 8, 2011. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2012/entries/social-institutions/. Accessed 30 Oct 2012.
Sanyal, B. (Ed.). (2005). Comparative planning cultures. London: Routledge.
Sperling, F., & Szekely, F. (2005). Disaster risk management in a changing climate. Discussion paper prepared for the world conference on disaster reduction on behalf of the Vulnerability and Adaptation Resource Group (VARG). Reprint with Addendum on conference outcomes, Washington, DC.
United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). (2004). Reducing disaster risk: A challenge for development a global report. New York: Bureau for Crisis Prevention and Recovery, United Nations Development Program.
United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNISDR). (2011). Global assessment report on disaster risk reduction: Revealing risk, redefining development. Geneva: UNISDR.
Venton, P., & Hansford, B. (2006). Reducing risk of disaster in our communities. Teddington: Tearfund. http://tilz.tearfund.org/~/media/Files/TILZ/Publications/ROOTS/English/Disaster/ROOTS%209%20-%202006%20version/Disaster%20risk%20reduction%20-%20full.pdf.
Work, R. (2002). The role of participation and partnership in decentralised governance: A brief synthesis of policy lessons and recommendations of nine country case studies on service delivery for the poor. New York: UNDP. http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/un/unpan006230.pdf. Accessed 25 Oct 2011.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Simarmata, H.A., Suryandaru, R.W. (2015). Institutions and Planning: A Reflection from Disaster Management Planning in Indonesia. In: Werlen, B. (eds) Global Sustainability. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16477-9_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16477-9_13
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-16476-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-16477-9
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)