Advertisement

Value Chains’ Constraining Effect on Industrial Conventions and Market Adaptions

  • Torbjørn TrondsenEmail author
Chapter
  • 279 Downloads
Part of the MARE Publication Series book series (MARE, volume 8)

Abstract

Value chains constrain the business transactions’ capacity to maximize market value from limited resources. Seafood markets exhibit a strong demand for fresh, high-quality seafood, yet empirical studies show large variations in value chains’ adaptation and exploitation of market opportunities.

This paper shows that both the distance in space and time between the wild harvest and the consumption regions and the choice of preservation methods are important structural constraints for market adaptation. A comparative study of the Norwegian and Icelandic exports also shows that the value chains’ conventions, geographically rooted in harvesting and processing regions upstream, have a significant effect in shaping differences in the value chains’ market adaptation downstream.

Keywords

Constraining effects Conventions Market adaptions Fish exports Cod value chains Environmental adaptation Governance Iceland Norway 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The author is thankful for critical comments and recommendations of an earlier draft of the paper from my colleagues Knut Lindkvist and José Luis Sànchez Hernàndez.

References

  1. Andersen MA (2009) Regionalizing global trade patterns, 1981–2001: application of a new method. Can Geogr 53(1):20–44Google Scholar
  2. Bestor TC (2004) Tsukiji. The fish market at the center of the world. University of California Press, Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
  3. Cano CR, Carrillat FA, Jaramillo F (2004) A meta-analysis of the relationship between market orientation and business performance: evidence from five continents. Int J Res Mark 21:179–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Crevoisier O (2004) The innovative milieus approach: toward a territorialized understanding of the economy? Econ Geogr 80 (4):367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cyert RM, March JG (1963) A behavioural theory of the firm. Prentice Hall Inc, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  6. Day GS (1994) The capabilities of market driven organizations. J Mark 58(4):37–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dulsrud A (2002) Tillit og Transaksjoner. En kvalitativ analyse av kontraktsrelasjoner i norsk hvitfiskeksport. National Institute for Consumer Research, Report 2, OsloGoogle Scholar
  8. Fisher ML (1997) What is the right supply chain for your product? Harv Bus Rev 75(2):1005–1116Google Scholar
  9. Gereffi G, Humphrey J, Sturgeon T (2005) The governance of global value chains. Rev Int Political Econ 12(1):78—104Google Scholar
  10. Grunert KG, Trondsen T, Campos EG, Young JA (2010) Market orientation in the mental models of decision makers. Two cross-border value chains. Int Mark Rev 27(1):7–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hallenstvedt A (1982) Med lov og organisasjon: organisering av interesser og markeder i norsk fiskerinæring. Universitetsforlaget, OsloGoogle Scholar
  12. Helstad K, Vassdal T, Trondsen T (2005) Price links between auction and direct sales of fresh and frozen fish in North Norway (1997–2003). Mar Resour Econ 20:305–322Google Scholar
  13. Kooiman J et al (eds) (2005) Fish for life: interactive governance for fisheries. Amsterdam University Press, AmsterdamCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kurlandsky M (1999) The Basque history of the world. Alfred A. Knopf, TorontoGoogle Scholar
  15. Lindkvist KB, Sánchez J (2008) Conventions and innovation: a comparison of two localized natural resource-based industries. Reg Stud 42(3):343–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lindkvist KB, Gallart-Jornet L, Stabell MC (2008) The restructuring of the Spanish salted fish market. Can Geogr 52(1):105–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Murdoch J, Marsden T, Banks J (2000) Quality, nature, and embeddedness: some theoretical considerations in the context of the food sector. Econ Geogr 78:107–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Myrland Ø, Johnston RS, Lund E, Trondsen T (2000) Determinants of seafood consumption in Norway: lifestyle, revealed preferences, and barriers to consumption. Food Qual Prefer 11(3):169–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Narver JC, Slater SF, MacLachlan DL (2004) Responsive and proactive market orientation and new-product success. J Prod Innov Manage 21:334–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Porter M (1990) The competitive advantage of nations. The Macmillan Press Ltd, LondonGoogle Scholar
  21. Sánchez-Hernández JL (2011) The food value chain as a locus for (Dis) agreement: conventions and qualities in the Spanish wine and Norwegian Salted-Cod Industries. Geografiska Annaler: Series B. Hum Geogr 93(2):105—119Google Scholar
  22. Scholderer J, Trondsen T (2008) The dynamics of consumer behavior: on habit, discontent, and other fish to fry. Appetite 51:576–591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Simon H (1957). Administrative behavior. Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  24. Stevens JS (1980–1981) The public trust: a sovereign’s ancient prerogative becomes the people’s environment right. The University of California Davis Law Review 195–210. http://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/davlr14&div=16&id=&page=
  25. Swartz W, Rashid Sumaila U, Watson R, Pauly D (2010) Sourcing seafood for the three major markets: the EU, Japan and the USA. Mar Policy 34:1255–1373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Trondsen T (1985) Industriell Innovasjon. En studie av institusjonelle forutsetninger. Dr. Scient. thesis, Institute for fishery science, University of TromsøGoogle Scholar
  27. Trondsen T (2012) Value chains, business conventions, and market adaptation: a comparative analysis of Norwegian and Icelandic fish exports. The Canadian Geographer/Le Géographe canadien 56(4):459—473Google Scholar
  28. Trondsen T, Arnarson I (2010) The salted fish project. report from iceland survey. Working paper, The Norwegian College of fishery Science, University of TromsøGoogle Scholar
  29. Trondsen T, Johnston RS (1998) Market orientation and raw material control. J Mark Focus Manage 3:193–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Trondsen T, Young JA (2006) The role of fish auctions in value adding in fish marketing chains. In: Ashe F (ed) Primary industries facing global markets. The supply chain and markets for Norwegian food. Universitetsforlaget, OsloGoogle Scholar
  31. Trondsen T, Helstad K, Young J (2003a) Market-oriented regional fisheries management? An analysis of four fish regions in the North Atlantic. Ocean Coast Manage 46 (9–10):917–941CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Trondsen T, Scholderer J, Lund E, Eggen AE (2003b) Perceived barriers to consumption of fish among Norwegian women. Appetite 41(3):301–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Trondsen T, Braaten T, Lund E, Eggen AE (2004a) Health and seafood consumption patterns among women aged 45–69 years. A Norwegian seafood consumption study. Food Qual Prefer 15(2):117–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Trondsen T, Braaten T, Lund E, Eggen AE (2004b) Consumption of seafood—the influence of overweight and health beliefs. Food Qual Prefer 15(4):361–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Whitely R (1999) Divergent capitalisms: the social structuring and change of business systems. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Norwegian College of Fishery ScienceUniversity of TromsøTromsøNorway
  2. 2.Department of GeographyUniversity of BergenBergenNorway

Personalised recommendations