Abstract
NYSCI’s Design Lab is an innovation laboratory for science, technology, engineering, and math learning through design. Developed for the general public, teachers, and schools, Design Lab includes a 9500 square foot museum exhibition with facilitated design activities, a series of digital resources and mobile tools for teachers and classrooms, and ongoing professional development of teachers. Contrary to inquiry-based science that aims for one elegant explanation to describe a wide range of phenomena, engineering design deals in situational tradeoffs where there are a number of right answers that depend on how you define the problem, the materials and tools available, and the context in which you intend to use your solution. NYSCI has been experimenting with how to create engineering design experiences that personally motivate all types of learners to wrestle with STEM-related content and to generate their own divergent solutions. In this chapter, we share insights into how the quality of the invitation into engineering activities allows different learners to experience success and to exhibit skill sets and expertise that aren’t always privileged in school. We also explore how museum-based design activities can serve as catalysts for teachers to witness their students’ strengths in action and the strategies and tools for extending engineering design into their classrooms.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Caleb, L. (2000). Design technology: Learning how girls learn best. Equity and Excellence in Education, 33(1), 22–25.
Davidson, A. L., & Schofield, J. W. (2002). Female voices in virtual reality: Drawing young girls into an online world. In K. A. Renninger & W. Shumar (Eds.), Building virtual communities: Learning and change in cyberspace (pp. 34–59). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Duckworth, A. L., Peterson, C., Matthews, M. D., & Kelly, D. R. (2007). Grit: Perseverance and passion for long-term goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(6), 1087–1101.
Duckworth, A. L., Grant, H., Loew, B., Oettingen, G., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (2011). Self-regulation strategies improve self-discipline in adolescents: Benefits of mental contrasting and implementation intentions. Educational Psychology: An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology, 31(1), 17–26.
Dweck, C., Walton, G. M., & Cohen, G. L. (2011). Academic tenacity: Mindsets and skills that promote log-term learning. Paper presented at the gates foundation, Seattle, WA.
Holland, D., Lachicotte, W., Jr., Skinner, D., & Cain, C. (1998). Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Hull, G., & Greeno, J. G. (2006). Identity and agency in nonschool and school worlds. In N. C. Burbules & D. Silberman-Keller (Eds.), Learning in places: The informal education reader (pp. 77–97). New York: Peter Lang.
Johnson, S. (2010, September 25). The genius of the tinkerer. Wall Street Journal. Retrieved from http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703989304575503730101860838.html
Margolis, J., & Fisher, A. (2002). Unlocking the computer clubhouse. Cambridge: MIT Press.
National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas (p. 218). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Available at http://www.nextgenscience.org
Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2008). A resource and policy guide. Retrieved from http://www.p21.org/storage/documents/21st_century_skills_education_and_competitiveness_guide.pdf
Perry, D. L. (1994). Designing exhibits that motivate. In R. J. Hannapel (Ed.), What research says about learning in science museums (Vol. 2, pp. 25–29). Washington, DC: Association of Science-Technology Centers.
Rosser, S. V. (1990). Female-friendly science: Applying women’s studies methods and theories to attract students. New York: Pergamon.
Schofield, J. (1995). Computers and classroom culture. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Turkle, S. (1984). The second self: Computers and the human spirit. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Turkle, S. (1988). Computational reticence: Why women fear the intimate machine. In C. Kramarae (Ed.), Technology and women’s voices (pp. 41–61). New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Turkle, S., & Papert, S. (1990). Epistemological pluralism: Styles and voices within the computer culture. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 16(1), 128–157.
Turkle, S., & Papert, S. (1992). Epistemological pluralism and the revaluation of the concrete. In I. Harel & S. Papert (Eds.), Constructionism (pp. 161–191). Norwood: Ablex.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bennett, D., Monahan, P., Honey, M. (2016). Museum Design Experiences That Recognize New Ways to Be Smart. In: Annetta, L., Minogue, J. (eds) Connecting Science and Engineering Education Practices in Meaningful Ways. Contemporary Trends and Issues in Science Education, vol 44. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16399-4_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16399-4_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-16398-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-16399-4
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)