Skip to main content

Norm Entrepreneurs Advocating the Responsibility to Protect, and Peacekeeping Reform Proposals

  • Chapter
Perspectives on Peacekeeping and Atrocity Prevention

Part of the book series: Humanitarian Solutions in the 21st Century ((HSIC))

  • 764 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter considers what makes norm entrepreneurs advocating the responsibility to protect and peacekeeping reform proposals attractive to potential norm-takers and why. It argues that the political identities, trustworthiness, and legitimacy of norm entrepreneurs play an important role in persuading others to take on new norms. Financial resources, academic esteem, and professional connections affect norm entrepreneurs’ influence and authority. The chapter concludes by considering the implications of this analysis for the NGOs and scholars seeking to advance—or understand the advancement of—new protection norms and peacekeeping policy proposals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Acharya, A. (2004). How ideas spread: Whose norms matter? Norm localization and institutional change in Asian regionalism. International Organisation, 58(2), 239–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Badescu, C. G., & Weiss, T. G. (2010). Misrepresenting RtoP and advancing norms: An alternative spiral? International Studies Perspectives, 11(4), 354–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellamy, A. (2009). Responsibility to protect: The global effort to end mass atrocities. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellamy, A. (2010). The responsibility to protect and Australian Foreign Policy. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 64(4), 432–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berman, S. (2001). Ideas, norms, and culture in political analysis. Comparative Politics, 33(2), 231–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berman, D., & Michaelsen, C. (2012). Intervention in Libya: Another nail in the coffin for the responsibility-to-protect? International Community Law Review, 14(4), 337–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bianco, W. T., & Bates, R. H. (1990). Cooperation by design: Leadership, structure, and collective dilemmas. The American Political Science Review, 84(1), 133–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bob, C. (2005). The marketing of rebellion: Insurgents, media, and international activism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bratberg, Ø. (2011). Ideas, tradition and norm entrepreneurs: Retracing guiding principles of Foreign Policy in Blair and Chirac’s speeches on Iraq. Review of International Studies, 1(1), 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brigg, M., & Bleiker, R. (2010). Autoethnographic international relations: Exploring the self as a source of knowledge. Review of International Studies, 36(3), 779–798.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caballero-Anthony, M., & Chng, B. (2009). Cyclones and humanitarian crises: Pushing the limits of R2P in Southeast Asia. Global Responsibility to Protect, 1(2), 135–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, R. C. (2007). Setting the advocacy agenda: Theorizing issue emergence and nonemergence in transnational advocacy networks. International Studies Quarterly, 51(1), 99–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, R. C. (2014). “Lost” causes: Agenda vetting in global issue networks and the shaping of human security. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkel, J. T. (1999). Norms, institutions, and national identity in contemporary Europe. International Studies Quarterly, 43(1), 84–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Checkel, J. T. (2001). Why comply? Social learning and European identity change. International Organisation, 55(03), 553–588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT). (2003). Advancing the national interest: Australia’s Foreign and Trade Policy White Paper. Canberra: Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dibley, T. (2014). Partnerships, power and peacebuilding: NGOs as agents of peace in Aceh and Timor-Leste. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, G. (2012). Healing injustices by preventing future atrocities. Rama Mani in conversation with Gareth Evans, Public Lecture Theatre, University of Melbourne, 15 February 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Field notes 4, Canberra, Australia, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Field research notes 1, New York, 7 June 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Field research notes 2, Sydney, Australia, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Field research notes 3, Sydney, Australia, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finnemore, M., & Sikkink, K. (1998). International norm dynamics and political change. International Organisation, 52(04), 887–917.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francis, A. (2011). Capacity-building workshops on the Responsibility to Protect (RtoP) and the Protection of Civilians (POC) in armed conflict -summary report. United Nations University, Griffith University and the Queensland University of Technology in association with the Australian National University. Available at http://eprints.qut.edu.au/48488/2/48488.pdf. Accessed 25 Jan 2014.

  • Franklin, M. (2011). Ovations and flattery in Julia Gillard’s speech to US Congress. The Australian, 10 March 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frost, F. (2009). Australia’s proposal for an ‘Asia Pacific Community’: Issues and prospects. Research Paper 13. Canberra: Parliament of Australia. Available at http://www.aph.gov.au/binaries/library/pubs/rp/2009-10/10rp13.pdf. Accessed 25 Jan 2014.

  • Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York, NY: Garden City.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hefner, R. W., & Horvatich, P. (1997). Islam in an era of nation-states: Politics and religious renewal in Muslim Southeast Asia. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herro, A. (2015). United Nations Emergency peace service and the responsibility to protect. Abington: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herro, A., & Suthanthiraraj, K. (2012). Framing a protection service. In A. Francis, V. Popovski, & C. Sampford (Eds.), The norms of protection: Protection of civilians and the responsibility to protect (pp. 152–175). Tokyo: United Nations University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann, M. J. (2003). Entrepreneurs and norm dynamics: An agent-based model of the norm life cycle. Paper presented at Penn’s Agent-Based Modeling Laboratory.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Coalition for the Responsibility to Protect (ICRtoP). (n.d). Learn about the international coalition for the responsibility to protect. http://www.responsibilitytoprotect.org/index.php/about-coalition. Accessed 19 June 2014.

  • Johansen, R. C. (Ed.). (2006). A United Nations Emergency Peace Service: To prevent genocide and crimes against humanity. New York: World Federalist Movement—Institute for Global Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, A. I. (2001). Treating international institutions as social environments. International Studies Quarterly, 45(4), 487–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, A. I. (2008). Social states: China in International Institutions, 1980–2000. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kadir, S. (2004). Mapping Muslim politics in Southeast Asia after September 11. The Pacific Review, 17(2), 199–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keck, M. E., & Sikkink, K. (1998). Activists beyond borders: Advocacy networks in international politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kratochwil, F. V. (1989). Rules, norms, and decisions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhonta, E. M., Slater, D., & Tuong, V. (2008). The contribution of Southeast Asian political studies. In E. M. Kuhonta, D. Slater, & T. Vu (Eds.), Southeast Asia in political science: Theory, region, and qualitative analysis (pp. 1–29). Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langille, H. P. (2000). Conflict prevention: Options for rapid deployment and UN Standing Forces. International Peacekeeping, 7(1), 219–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lupia, A., & Mccubbins, M. D. (1998). The democratic dilemma: Can citizens learn what they need to know? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mcnulty, M. (1997). France’s role in Rwanda and external military intervention: A double discrediting. International Peacekeeping, 4(3), 24–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nadelmann, E. A. (1990). Global prohibition regimes: The evolution of norms in international society. International Organization, 44(4), 479–526.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’malley, N. (2011). Abbott criticises Australian defence cuts in US. Sydney Morning Herald, 18 July 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul, E. C. (2006). Little America: Australia, the 51st state. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Respondent 1, interview by author, Singapore, 15 June 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Respondent 2, interview by author, Jakarta, Indonesia, 6 May 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Respondent 3, interview by author, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 1 May 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Respondent 4, email correspondence by author, 29 March 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Respondent 5, phone interview with Kavitha Suthanthiraraj, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Respondent 6, interview by author, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 2 June 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Respondent 7, interview by author and Stuart Rees, Canberra, Australia, 8 October 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Respondent 8, interview by authors, Singapore, 16 June 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Respondent 9, interview by author, Jakarta, Indonesia, 5 May 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Respondent 11, interview by author and Stuart Rees, Canberra, Australia 8 October 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Risse-Kappen, T., Ropp, S. C., & Sikkink, K. (1999). The power of human rights: International norms and domestic change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Said, E. (1979). Orientalism. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saravanamuttu, J. (2010). Introduction: Majority-minority Muslim politics and democracy. In J. Saravanamuttu (Ed.), Islam and politics in southeast Asia (pp. 1–21). Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. M. (2004). Identities, interests, and the future of political science. Perspectives on Politics, 2, 301–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, S. (2009). Australian responsibility to protect fund: Final results of RtoP Fund Selection Committee. Available from http://www.foreignminister.gov.au/releases/2009/fa-s090925a-att.html. Accessed 25 Jan 2014.

  • Tan, S. S. (2012). Towards a ‘Responsibility to Provide’: Cultivating an ethic of responsible sovereignty in Southeast Asia. In A. Francis, V. Popovski, & C. Sampford (Eds.), The norms of protection: Protection of civilians and the responsibility to protect (pp. 249–267). Tokyo: United Nations University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thakur, R. (2011). The responsibility to protect: Norms, laws and the use of force in international politics global governance. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (2005). Resolution adopted by the General Assembly 60/1. 15 September 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters, P. (2008). Rudd Asia Plan ‘Dead in Water’. The Australian, 4 July 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1968). Max Weber on Charisma and Institution Building: Selected papers and with an introduction. In S. N. Eisenstadt (Ed.), Shmuel Noah Eisenstadt. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, T. G. (2013). What’s wrong with the United Nations and how to fix it (2nd ed.). Malden, MA: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welsh, J., Quinton-Brown, P., & MacDiarmid, V. (2013). Brazil’s ‘Responsibility While Protecting’ proposal: A Canadian perspective. Canadian Centre for the Responsibility to Protect, 12 July 2013. http://ccr2p.org/?p=616. Accessed 15 Sept 2014.

  • Young, R. (1996). Torn halves: Political conflict in literary and cultural theory. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zürn, M., & Checkel, J. T. (2005). Getting socialised to build bridges: Constructivism and rationalism, Europe and the Nation-State. International Organisation, 59(4), 1045–1079.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Annie Herro .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Herro, A. (2015). Norm Entrepreneurs Advocating the Responsibility to Protect, and Peacekeeping Reform Proposals. In: Curran, D., Fraser, T., Roeder, L., Zuber, R. (eds) Perspectives on Peacekeeping and Atrocity Prevention. Humanitarian Solutions in the 21st Century. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16372-7_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics