Skip to main content

Study 1: The Bottom of the Pyramid Market as a Source for Disruptive Innovations

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: India Studies in Business and Economics ((ISBE))

Abstract

Innovations emerging from the Bottom of the Pyramid (BOP) markets have been engaging scholars and practitioners in the last decade. Several concepts have emerged to describe this phenomenon, such as frugal innovation, Gandhian innovation, inclusive innovation, jugaad innovation and reverse innovation, which describe this emerging phenomenon from different perspectives. This emerging phenomenon has the potential to enrich mainstream management theories, however, the BOP phenomenon remains largely under-theorized in academic literature.

The aim of this chapter is to embed this phenomenon in disruptive innovation theory and highlight the similarities between these concepts. Further, this study will examine two case studies, namely Narayana Hrudayalaya (NH) and Aravind Eye Care Systems (AECS), two low-cost specialty hospital chains in India to explain why BOP markets can be considered a source for disruptive innovations.

The Aravind Eye Care System (AECS) and Narayana Hrudayalaya (NH) hospitals have pioneered a system of providing extremely affordable healthcare to the poor by establishing high volume focused hospital chains. These companies have innovated their business models and processes to enable delivery of highly standardized procedures at extremely low cost. These companies have also innovated beyond their processes to create other product and business model innovations on their own as well as in cooperation with external partners. Thus, they provide a valuable empirical context to examine the innovation capacity of companies serving the BOP.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Source: India Census 2011.

References

  • AECS. (2013). Activity report. Madurai: Aravind Eye Care Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aitken, M., Backliwal, A., Chang, M., & Udeshi, A. (2013). Understanding Healthcare Access in India: What is the current state? Parsippany, NJ: IMS Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvord, S., Brown, D. L., & Letts, C. W. (2004). Social entrepreneurship and societal transformation an exploratory study. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 40(3), 260–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anand, G. (2009). The Henry Ford of heart surgery. Wall Street Journal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J., & Billou, N. (2007). Serving the World’s Poor: Innovation at the base of the economic pyramid. Journal of Business Strategy, 28(2), 14–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bai, V. T., Murali, V., Kim, R., & Srivatsa, S. K. (2007). Teleophthalmology-based rural eye care in India. Telemedicine and e-Health, 13(3), 313–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balarajan, Y., Selvaraj, S., & Subramanian, S. V. (2011). Health care and equity in India. The Lancet, 377(9764), 505–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhandari, A., Dratler, S., Raube, K., & Thulasiraj, R. D. (2008). Specialty care systems: A pioneering vision for global health. Health Affairs, 27(4), 964–976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bogers, M., Afuah, A., & Bastian, B. (2010). Users as innovators: A review, critique, and future research directions. Journal of Management, 36(4), 857–875.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruton, G. D. (2010). Letter from the editor: Business and the World’s poorest billion–the need for an expanded examination by management scholars. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 24(3), 6–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, C. M. (1993). The rigid disk drive industry: A history of commercial and technological turbulence. Business History Review, 67(04), 531–588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, C. M. (1997). The innovator’s dilemma: When new technologies cause great firms to fail. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, C. M. (2006). The ongoing process of building a theory of disruption. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 23(1), 39–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, C. M., Bohmer, R., & Kenagy, J. (2000). Will disruptive innovations cure health care? Harvard Buisness Review, 78(5), 102–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, C. M., & Bower, J. L. (1996). Customer power, strategic investment, and the failure of leading firms. Strategic Management Journal, 17(3), 197–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, C. M., Grossman, J. H., & Hwang, J. (2009). The innovator’s prescription: A disruptive solution for health care. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. (2003). The innovator’s solution: Creating and sustaining successful growth. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, C. M., & Rosenbloom, R. S. (1995). Explaining the attacker’s advantage: Technological paradigms, organizational dynamics, and the value network. Research Policy, 24(2), 233–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Souza, N. (2012, April 13). Why single-speciality hospitals are Prospering. Forbes India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danneels, E. (2004). Disruptive technology reconsidered: A critique and research agenda. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 21, 246–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deloitte. (2010). Medical technology industry in India. Deloitte and CII.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeMonaco, H. J., Ali, A., & Hippel, E. (2006). The major role of clinicians in the discovery of off-label drug therapies. Pharmacotherapy: The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy, 26(3), 323–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Economist. (2009, April 18). Lessons from a frugal innovator. The Economist.

    Google Scholar 

  • Economist. (2010). First break all the rules. The Economist.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emmerson, C., Frayne, C., & Goodman, A. (2000). Pressures in UK Healthcare: Challenges for the NHS. Institute for Fiscal Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldstein, P. J. (2011). Health care economics. Clifton Park, NY: Cengage Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • George, G., McGahan, A. M., & Prabhu, J. (2012). Innovation for inclusive growth: Towards a theoretical framework and a research agenda. Journal of Management Studies, 49(4), 661–683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Govindarajan, V., & Kopalle, P. K. (2006). The usefulness of measuring disruptiveness of innovations ex post in making ex ante prediction. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 23(1), 12–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Govindarajan, V., & Ramamurti, R. (2011). Reverse innovation, emerging markets, and global strategy. Global Strategy Journal, 1(3–4), 191–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Govindarajan, V., & Trimble, C. (2009). Is reverse innovation like disruptive innovation? Harvard Business Review Blog Network.

    Google Scholar 

  • Govindarajan, V., & Trimble, C. (2012). Reverse innovation: Create far from home, win everywhere. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gudwani, A., Mitra, P., Puri, A., & Vaidya, M. (2012). India Healthcare: Inspiring possibilities, challenging journey. New York: McKinsey & company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, A. K. (2006). From sink to source: The Honey Bee Network documents indigenous knowledge and innovations in India. Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, 1(3), 49–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, A. (2010). The next 4 billion: Market size and business strategy at the base of the pyramid. Washington, DC: World Resource Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hang, C.-C., Chen, J., & Subramian, A. M. (2010). Developing disruptive products for emerging economies: Lessons from Asian cases. Research-Technology Management, 53(4), 21–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, S. (2010). Taking the green leap to the base of the pyramid. In T. London & S. Hart (Eds.), Next generation business strategies for the base of the pyramid. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, S., & Christensen, C. (2002, Fall). The great leap. MIT Sloan Managment Review.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herstatt, C., & Von Hippel, E. (1992). From experience: Developing new product concepts via the lead user method: A case study in a “low-tech” field. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 9(3), 213–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howitt, P., Darzi, A., Yang, G.-Z., Ashrafian, H., Atun, R., Barlow, J., Blakemore, A., Bull, A. M. J., Car, J., & Conteh, L. (2012). Technologies for global health. The Lancet, 380(9840), 507–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, J., & Christensen, C. M. (2008). Disruptive innovation in health care delivery: A framework for business-model innovation. Health Affairs, 27(5), 1329–1335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ibrahim, M., Bhandari, A., Sandhu, J. S., & Balakrishnan, P. (2006). Making Sight Affordable (Part I): Aurolab Pioneers production of low-cost technology for cataract surgery. Innovations, 1(3), 25–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Immelt, J., & Govindrajan, V. (2009). How GE is disrupting itself. Harvard Buisness Review, 87(10), 56–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jain, S. (2013). Frugal innovation and disruptive innovation theory. In L Toombs (ed.), Academy of management conference 2013, Lake Buena Vista, Florida, 2013. AOM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khanna, T., Kasturirangan, V., & Manocaran, M. (2005). Narayana Hrudayalaya Heart Hospital: Cardiac care for the poor. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School.

    Google Scholar 

  • KPMG. (2011). Emerging trends in healthcare—A journey from bench to bedside. KPMG.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuruvilla, S., Liu, M., & Jacob, P. (2005). A case study of the Yeshasvini Health Insurance Scheme for the rural poor in India. International Journal of Self Help and Self Care, 3(3), 261–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lettl, C., Herstatt, C., & Gemuenden, H. (2006). Users’ contributions to radical innovation: Evidence from four cases in the field of medical equipment technology. R&D Management, 36(3), 251–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lévi-Strauss, C. (1967). The savage mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lilien, G. L., Morrison, P. D., Searls, K., Sonnack, M., & Von Hippel, E. (2002). Performance assessment of the lead user idea-generation process for new product development. Management Science, 48(8), 1042–1059.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • London, T. (2007). A base-of-the-pyramid perspective on poverty alleviation. Ann Arbor, MI: William Davidson Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lüthje, C., & Herstatt, C. (2004). The Lead User method: An outline of empirical findings and issues for future research. R&D Management, 34(5), 553–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maheshwari, S., & Kiran, V. S. (2009). Cardiac care for the economically challenged: What are the options? Annals of Pediatric Cardiology, 2(1), 91–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markides, C. (2006). Disruptive innovation: In need of better theory. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 23(1), 19–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mashelkar, R., & Borde, S. (2010). Value for money and for many. MIT Technology Review, India Edition Feb 2010 (pp. 32–36).

    Google Scholar 

  • Militzer, J. (2013). Cracking the code on affordable health care—Part 2: An interview with Dr. Devi Shetty, founder of Narayana Hrudayalaya, next billion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullan, F. (2006). Doctors for the World: Indian physician emigration. Health Affairs, 25(2), 380–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Natchiar, G., et al. (1994). Attacking the backlog of India’s curable blind: The Aravind Eye hospital model. Archives of Ophthalmology, 112(7), 987–993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NHRM. (2005). National Rural Health Mission: Mission Document 2005–2012. New Delhi: National Rural Health Mission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedro Olinto, K. B., Sobrado, C., & Uematsu, H. (2013). The state of the poor: Where are the poor, where is extreme poverty harder to end, and what is the current profile of the World’s poor? Poverty Reduction and Economic Management Network; The World Bank October 2013 (No. 125).

    Google Scholar 

  • Praceus, S., & Herstatt, C. (2012). Consumer innovation in the poor versus rich world: Some differences and similarities. Working Paper, Technologie-und Innovationsmanagement, Technische Universität Hamburg-Harburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C. K. (2004). The fortune at the bottom of the pyramid: Eradicating poverty through profits. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Wharton School Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C. K. (2006). The innovation Sandbox. Strategy & Business, 44, 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C. K. (2012). Bottom of the pyramid as a source of breakthrough innovations. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29(1), 6–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C. K., & Hart, S. (2002). The fortune at the bottom of the pyramid. Strategy & Business, 26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C. K., & Lieberthal, K. (1998). The end of corporate imperialism. Harvard Buisness Review, 76, 68–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C. K., & Mashelkar, R. (2010). Innovation’s Holy Grail. Harvard Business Review, 7(8), 132–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radjou, N., Prabhu, J., & Ahuja, S. (2012). Jugaad innovation: Think frugal, be flexible, generate breakthrough growth. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rangan, V. K., & Thulasiraj, R. D. (2007). Making sight affordable. Innovations, 2, 35–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ray, P. K., & Ray, S. (2010). Resource-constrained innovation for emerging economies: The case of the Indian telecommunications industry. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 57(1), 144–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reinhardt, U. E., Hussey, P. S., & Anderson, G. F. (2004). US health care spending in an international context. Health Affairs, 23(3), 10–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, A., & Iyer, G. R. (2012). Resource-constrained product development: Implications for green marketing and green supply chains. Industrial Marketing Management, 41(4), 599–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherawat, R., & Rao, K. D. (2012). Insured yet vulnerable: Out-of pocket payments and India’s poor. Health Policy and Planning, 27, 213–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, S., Newhouse, J. P., & Freeland, M. S. (2009). Income, insurance, and technology: Why does health spending outpace economic growth? Health Affairs, 28(5), 1276–1284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiwari, R., & Herstatt, C. (2012). Assessing India’s lead market potential for cost-effective innovations. Journal of Indian Business Research, 4(2), 97–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trouiller, P., Olliaro, P., Torreele, E., Orbinski, J., Laing, R., & Ford, N. (2002). Drug development for neglected diseases: A deficient market and a public-health policy failure. Public Health, 359(9324), 2188–2194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, L. (2010). “Medical tourism” and the global marketplace in health services: US patients, international hospitals, and the search for affordable health care. International Journal of Health Services, 40(3), 443–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vickers, T., & Rossen, E. (2011). Driving down the cost of high-quality care: Lessons from the Aravind Eye Care System. Health International, 11. McKinsey & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Hippel, E. (1978). A customer-active paradigm for industrial product idea generation. Research Policy, 7(3), 240–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Von Hippel, E. (1982). Appropriability of innovation benefit as a predictor of the source of innovation. Research Policy, 11(2), 95–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Von Hippel, E. (1986). Lead users: A source of novel product concepts. Management Science, 32(7), 791–805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Von Hippel, E. (1994). “Sticky information” and the locus of problem solving: Implications for innovation. Management Science, 40(4), 429–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Von Hippel, E. (2003). Democratizing innovation (Vol. 1). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Hippel, E., Thomke, S., & Sonnack, M. (1999). Creating breakthroughs at 3 M. Harvard Buisness Review, 77, 47–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • WHO. (2006). The World Health Report 2006—working together for health. Geneva: World Health Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, D., & Hang, C. C. (2011). Creating technology candidates for disruptive innovation: Generally applicable R&D strategies. Technovation, 31(8), 401–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ramdorai, A., Herstatt, C. (2015). Study 1: The Bottom of the Pyramid Market as a Source for Disruptive Innovations. In: Frugal Innovation in Healthcare. India Studies in Business and Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16336-9_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics