Mitigation of Pounding Effects

  • Robert JankowskiEmail author
  • Sayed Mahmoud
Part of the GeoPlanet: Earth and Planetary Sciences book series (GEPS)


An intensive study has been carried out on mitigation of pounding hazards. One of the objectives is to develop procedures for evaluating an adequate separation distance between buildings or bridge segments in order to prevent contacts during earthquakes.


Ground Motion Spring Element Peak Displacement Earthquake Excitation Link Element 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Raheem, A.S.E.: Pounding mitigation and unseating prevention at expansion joint of isolated multi-span bridges. Eng. Struct. 31, 2345–2356 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Raheem, A.S.E.: Mitigation measures for earthquake induced pounding effects on seismic performance of adjacent buildings. Bull. Earthq. Eng. 12, 1705–1724 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Abdullah, M.M., Hanif, J.H., Richardson, A., Sobanjo, J.: Use of a shared tuned mass damper (STMD) to reduce vibration and pounding in adjacent structures. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dynam. 30, 1185–1201 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anagnostopoulos, S.A.: Pounding of buildings in series during earthquakes. Earthq Eng. Struct. Dynam. 16, 443–456 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Anagnostopoulos, S.A., Spiliopoulos, K.V.: An investigation of earthquake induced pounding between adjacent buildings. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dynam. 21, 289–302 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Anagnostopoulos, S.A.: Building pounding re-examined: how serious a problem is it? Eleventh world conference on earthquake engineering, Acapulco, Mexico, 23–28 June 1996, paper no. 210Google Scholar
  7. Anagnostopoulos, S.A., Karamaneas, C.E.: Use of collision shear walls to minimize seismic separation and to protect adjacent buildings from collapse due to earthquake-induced pounding. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 37, 1371–1388 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cimellaro, G.P., Lopez-Garcia, D.: Algorithm for design of controlled motion of adjacent structures. Struct. Control and Health Monit. 18, 140–148 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. DesRoches, R., Muthukumar, S.: Effect of pounding and restrainers on seismic response of multiple-frame bridges. J. Struct. Eng. 128, 860–869 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Divyashree, M., Bhavyashree, B.N., Siddappa, G.: Comparison of bracing and shear walls as seismic strengthening methods to buildings with plan irregularities. Inter. J. Res. Eng. Technol. 3, 205–210 (2014)Google Scholar
  11. ECS: Eurocode 8: Design Provisions for Earthquake Resistance of Structures. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels (1998)Google Scholar
  12. Falborski, T., Jankowski, R.: Polymeric bearings—a new base isolation system to reduce structural damage during earthquakes. Key Eng. Mater. 569–570, 143–150 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Filiatrault, A., Cervantes, M., Folz, B., Prion, H.: Pounding of buildings during earthquakes: a Canadian perspective. Can. J. Civ. Eng. 21, 251–265 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hameed, A., Saleem, M., Qazi, A.U., Saeed, S., Bashir, M.A.: Mitigation of seismic pounding between adjacent buildings. Pak. J. Sci. 64, 326–333 (2012)Google Scholar
  15. Hao, H., Shen, J.: Estimation of relative displacement of two adjacent asymmetric structures. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 30, 81–96 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hrovat, D., Barak, P., Rabins, M.: Semi-active versus passive or active tuned mass damper for structural control. J. Eng. Mech. ASCE 109, 691–705 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. IBC: International Building Code. International Code Council Inc., USA (2009)Google Scholar
  18. IS: Indian Standard, Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures. IS 1893–2002. Bureau of Indian standards, India (2002)Google Scholar
  19. Jankowski, R.: Nonlinear rate dependent model of high damping rubber bearing. Bull. Earthq. Eng. 1, 397–403 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jankowski, R.: Impact force spectrum for damage assessment of earthquake-induced structural pounding. Key Eng. Mater. 293–294, 711–718 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jankowski, R.: Assessment of damage due to earthquake-induced pounding between the main building and the stairway tower. Key Eng. Mater. 347, 339–344 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jankowski, R.: Non-linear FEM analysis of pounding-involved response of buildings under non-uniform earthquake excitation. Eng. Struct. 37, 99–105 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jankowski, R., Wilde, K., Fujino, Y.: Pounding of superstructure segments in isolated elevated bridge during earthquakes. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 27, 487–502 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jankowski, R., Wilde, K., Fujino, Y.: Reduction of pounding effects in elevated bridges during earthquakes. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 29, 195–212 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jeng, V., Kasai, K., Maison, B.F.: A spectral difference method to estimate building separations to avoid pounding. Earthq. Spectra 8, 201–223 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jeng, V., Tzeng, W.L.: Assessment of seismic pounding hazard for Taipei City. Eng. Struct. 22, 459–471 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kajita, Y., Kitahara, T., Nishimoto, Y., Otsuka, H.: Estimation of maximum impact force on natural rubber during collision of two steel bars. First European conference on earthquake engineering and seismology. Geneva, Switzerland, 3–8 September 2006, paper no. 488Google Scholar
  28. Kajita, Y., Nishimoto, Y., Ishikawa, N., Watanabe, E.: Energy absorption capacity of the laminated fiber reinforced rubber installed at girder ends. International Conference on High Performance Materials in Bridges. Kona, Hawaii, USA, 29 July–3 August 2001, pp 183–192Google Scholar
  29. Kasai, K., Jeng, V., Patel, P.C., Munshi, J.A., Maison, B.F: Seismic pounding effects—survey and analysis. Proceedings of the 10th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vol. VII, pp. 3893–3898. Madrid, Spain, 19–24 July 1992Google Scholar
  30. Kasai, K., Jagiasi, A.R.: Viscoelastic dampers for seismic pounding mitigation. Proceedings of the Structural Congress ASCE, Irvine, CC, pp. 199–204, 1993Google Scholar
  31. Kasai, K., Jagiasi, A.R., Jeng, V.: Inelastic vibration phase theory for seismic pounding mitigation. J. Struct. Eng. 122, 1136–1146 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kawashima, K., Shoji, G., Koshitoge, M., Shimanoe, S.: Design of an Earthquake-Resistant Expansion Joint with Unseating Prevention System. FIB Congress, Osaka, Japan (2002), E-282Google Scholar
  33. Kawashima, K., Unjoh, S.: Seismic response control of bridges by variable dampers. J. Struct. Eng. 120, 2583–2601 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kelly, J.M.: Earthquake-Resistant Design with Rubber. Springer-Verlag, London, UK (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kobori, T., Yamada, T., Takenaka, Y., Maeda, Y., Nishimura, I.: Effect of dynamic tuned connector on reduction of seismic response—application to adjacent office buildings. Proceedings of Ninth World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vol. V, pp. 773–778. Tokyo–Kyoto, Japan, 2–9 August 1988Google Scholar
  36. Komodromos, P.: Seismic Isolation of Earthquake-Resistant Structures. WIT Press, Southampton, UK (2000)Google Scholar
  37. Komodromos, P.: Simulation of the earthquake-induced pounding of seismically isolated buildings. Comput. Struct. 86, 618–626 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lin, J.-H.: Separation distance to avoid seismic pounding of adjacent buildings. Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dynam. 26, 395–403 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lin, J.-H., Weng, C.-C.: Probability analysis of seismic pounding of adjacent buildings. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 30, 1539–1557 (2001a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lin, J.-H., Weng, C.-C.: Spectral analysis on pounding probability of adjacent buildings. Eng. Struct. 23, 768–778 (2001b)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lopez-Garcia L.: Separation between adjacent nonlinear structures for prevention of seismic pounding. 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Vancouver, Canada, 1–6 August 2004, paper no. 478Google Scholar
  42. Loring A., Wyllie J.R.: Strengthening strategies for improved seismic performance. Eleventh World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Acapulco, Mexico, 23–28 June 1996, paper no. 1424Google Scholar
  43. Luco, J.E., De Barros, F.C.P.: Optimal damping between two adjacent elastic structures. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 27, 649–659 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mahmoud, S., Abd-Elhamed, A., Jankowski, R.: Earthquake-induced pounding between equal height multi-storey buildings considering soil-structure interaction. Bull. Earthq. Eng. 11(4), 1021–1048 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Mahmoud, S., Austrell, P.-E., Jankowski, R.: Simulation of the response of base-isolated buildings under earthquake excitations considering soil flexibility. Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vibr. 11, 359–374 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mahmoud, S., Gutub, S.: Earthquake induced pounding-involved response of base-isolated buildings incorporating soil flexibility. Adv. Struct. Eng. 16(12), 71–90 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Mahmoud, S., Jankowski, R.: Elastic and inelastic multi-storey buildings under earthquake excitation with the effect of pounding. J. Appl. Sci. 9, 3250–3262 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Mahmoud, S., Jankowski, R.: Pounding-involved response of isolated and non-isolated buildings under earthquake excitation. Earthq. Struct. 1, 231–252 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Mahmoud, S., Jankowski, R.: Modified linear viscoelastic model of earthquake-induced structural pounding. Iran. J. Sci. Technol. 35(C1), 51–62 (2011)Google Scholar
  50. Maison, B.F., Kasai, K.: Analysis for the type of structural pounding. J. Struct. Eng. ASCE 116, 957–977 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Maison, B.F., Ventura, C.E.: Seismic analysis of base-isolated San Bernardino County building. Earthq. Spectra 8, 605–633 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Malhotra, A., Carson, D., Gopal, P., Braimah, A., Di Giovanni, G., Pall, R.: Friction dampers for upgrade of St. Vincent hospital, Ottawa. 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, Canada, 1–6 August 2004, paper no. 1952Google Scholar
  53. Malhotra, P.K.: Dynamics of seismic impacts in base-isolated buildings. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 26, 797–813 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Mitoulis S.A., Tegos I.A., Malekakis A.: Experimental research on the capacity of bridge shear keys. COMPDYN 2013, 4th ECCOMAS Thematic Conference on Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering. Kos Island, Greece, 12–14 June 2013, pp. 1123–1132Google Scholar
  55. Naeim, F., Kelly, J.M.: Design of Seismic Isolated Structures: From Theory to Practice. Wiley, New York, USA (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Newmark, N.: A method of computation for structural dynamics. J. Eng. Mech. Div. ASCE 85, 67–94 (1959)Google Scholar
  57. NBC: National Building Code, Technical Standard of Building E.030, Earthquake Resistant Design. Ministry of Housing, Peru (2003)Google Scholar
  58. Ni, Y.Q., Ko, J.M., Ying, Z.G.: Random seismic response analysis of adjacent buildings coupled with non-linear hysteretic dampers. J. Sound Vibr. 246, 403–417 (2001)Google Scholar
  59. Pantelides, C.P., Ma, X.: Linear and nonlinear pounding of structural systems. Comput. Struct. 66, 79–92 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Patel, C.C., Jangid, R.S.: Seismic response of dynamically similar adjacent structures connected with viscous dampers. The IES J. Part A: Civ. Struct. Eng. 3, 1–13 (2010)Google Scholar
  61. Penzien, J.: Evaluation of building separation distance required to prevent pounding during strong earthquakes. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 26, 849–858 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Polycarpou, P.C., Komodromos, P.: Earthquake-induced poundings of a seismically isolated building with adjacent structures. Eng. Struct. 32, 1937–1951 (2010a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Polycarpou, P.C., Komodromos, P.: On poundings of a seismically isolated building with adjacent structures during strong earthquakes. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 39, 933–940 (2010b)Google Scholar
  64. Polycarpou, P.C., Komodromos, P.: Numerical investigation of potential mitigation measures for poundings of seismically isolated buildings. Earthqu. Struct. 2, 1–24 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Polycarpou, P.C., Komodromos, P., Polycarpou, A.C.: A nonlinear impact model for simulating the use of rubber shock absorbers for mitigating the effects of structural pounding during earthquakes. Earthqu. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 42, 81–100 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Rajaram, C.R., Kumar, P.: Comparison of codal provisions on pounding between adjacent buildings. Int. J. Earth Sci. Eng. 5, 71–79 (2012)Google Scholar
  67. Ruangrassamee, A., Kawashima, K.: Control of nonlinear bridge response with pounding effect by variable dampers. Eng. Struct. 25, 593–606 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Salomón, O., Oller, S., Barbat, A.: Finite element analysis of base isolated buildings subjected to earthquake loads. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng. 46, 1741–1761 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Shigeki, U.: Repair and retrofit of bridges damaged by the 2010 Chile Maule earthquake. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Engineering Lessons Learned from the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake. Tokyo, Japan, 1–4 March 2012, Part 2Google Scholar
  70. Shim, V.P.W., Yang, L.M., Lim, C.T., Law, P.H.: A visco-hyperelastic constitutive model to characterize both tensile and compressive behavior of rubber. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 92, 523–531 (2004)Google Scholar
  71. Sołtysik, B., Jankowski, R.: Non-linear strain rate analysis of earthquake-induced pounding between steel buildings. Int. J. Earth Sci. Eng. 6, 429–433 (2013)Google Scholar
  72. Soong, T.T., Constantinou, M.C.: Passive and Active Structural Vibration Control in Civil Engineering. Springer, Berlin (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Soong, T.T., Dargush, G.F.: Passive Energy Dissipation Systems in Structural Engineering. Wiley, New York (1997)Google Scholar
  74. Spiliopoulos, K.V., Anagnostopoulos, S.A.: Measures against earthquake pounding between adjacent buildings. Eleventh World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Acapulco, Mexico, 23–28 June 1996, paper no. 728Google Scholar
  75. Valles, R.E., Reinhorn, A.M.: Evaluation, prevention and mitigation of pounding effects in building structures. Technical Report NCEER–97–0001. National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, USA (1997)Google Scholar
  76. Wasti, S.T., Ozcebe, G.: Seismic Assessment and Rehabilitation of Existing Buildings. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Westermo, B.D.: The dynamics of interstructural connection to prevent pounding. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 18, 687–699 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Xu, Y.L., He, Q., Ko, J.M.: Dynamic response of damper-connected adjacent buildings under earthquake excitation. Eng. Struct. 21, 135–148 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Yang, Z., Xu, Y.L., Lu, X.L.: Experimental seismic study of adjacent buildings with fluid dampers. J. Struct.Eng. ASCE 129, 197–205 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Zhang, W.S., Xu, Y.L.: Dynamic characteristics and seismic response of adjacent buildings linked by discrete dampers. Earthqu. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 28, 1163–1185 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Zhang, W.S., Xu, Y.L.: Vibration analysis of two buildings linked by Maxwell model-defined fluid dampers. J. Sound Vibr. 233, 775–796 (2000)Google Scholar
  82. Zhu, H., Iemura, H.: A study of response control on the passive coupling element between two parallel structures. Struct. Eng. Mech. 9, 383–396 (2000)Google Scholar
  83. Zhu, H.P., Xu, Y.L.: Optimum parameters of Maxwell model-defined dampers used to link adjacent structures. J. Sound Vibr. 279, 253–274 (2005)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Civil and Environmental EngineeringGdansk University of TechnologyGdanskPoland
  2. 2.Department of Construction Engineering, College of EngineeringUniversity of DammamDammamKingdom of Saudi Arabia

Personalised recommendations