Skip to main content

Gradual Structures of Oppositions

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing ((STUDFUZZ,volume 322))

Abstract

There has been a renewal of interest in the use of squares of opposition and other related structures in the last decade, both for discussing issues in logical modeling and for their cognitive relevance. This paper outlines and motivates graded extensions of these structures (square, hexagon, cube, tetrahedron) of oppositions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Due to \(N(\overline{A})) = 1 - \varPi (A)\), it comes \(\max (0, \min (1,N(A) + N(\overline{A})) + \varPi (A) - 1) = \min (1 - N(\overline{A}), N(A)) = N(A)\) since \(\varPi (A) \ge N(A)\).

References

  1. Alsina, C., Trillas, E., Valverde, L.: On some logical connectives for fuzzy set theory, Busefal. 3 (1980), 18–29, Long version in. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 93(1), 15–26 (1983)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Amgoud, L., Prade, H.: A formal concept view of abstract argumentation. In: van der Gaag, L.C. (ed.) Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning under Uncertainty (ECSQARU’13), Utrecht, July 8–10, LNCS, 7958, pp. 1–12, Springer (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Belnap, N.; A useful four-valued logic. In: Dunn, M., Epstein, G., Reidel, D. (eds.) Modern Uses of Multiple Valued Logics. pp. 8–37 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Béziau, J.-Y.: New light on the square of oppositions and its nameless corner. Log. Investig. 10, 218–233 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Béziau, J.-Y.: The power of the hexagon. Logica Universalis 6(1–2), 1–43 (2012)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Blanché, R.: Sur l’opposition des concepts. Theoria 19, 89–130 (1953)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Blanché, R.: Structures intellectuelles. Essai sur l’organisation systématique des concepts, Vrin, Paris (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ciucci, D., Dubois, D., Prade, H.: The structure of oppositions in rough set theory and formal concept analysis–Toward a new bridge between the two settings. In: Beierle, C., Meghini, C. (eds.) Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium Foundations of Information and Knowledge Systems (FoIKS’14), Bordeaux, March 3–7, LNCS, vol. 8367, pp. 154–173, Springer (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cubillo, S., Trillas, E.: Characterizing non-monotonic fuzzy relations. Soft Comput. 1(4), 162–165 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dubois, D., Prade, H.: Possibility Theory: An Approach to Computerized Processing of Uncertainty. Plenum Press (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dubois, D., Prade, H.: Aggregation of possibility measures. In: Kacprzyk, J., Fedrizzi, M. (eds.). Multiperson Decision Making using Fuzzy Sets and Possibility Theory, pp. 55–63, Kluwer, Dordrecht (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dubois, D., Prade, H.: An overview of the asymmetric bipolar representation of positive and negative information in possibility theory. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 160(10), 1355–1366 (2009)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Dubois, D., Prade, H.: Soft quantifiers in the square of opposition and generalized syllogisms. In: Béziau, J.-Y., Gan-Krzywoszyńska, K. (eds.) Handbook of Abstracts of the 2nd World Congress on the Square of Opposition, Corte, 17–20 June (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Dubois, D., Prade, H.: From Blanché’s hexagonal organization of concepts to formal concept analysis and possibility theory. Logica University 6, 149–169 (2012)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Fortemps, P., Slowinski, R.: A graded quadrivalent logic for ordinal preference modelling: Loyola-like approach. Fuzzy Optim. Decis. Mak. 1(1), 93–111 (2002)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Klement, E.P., Mesiar, R., Pap, E.: Triangular Norms. Springer (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Miclet, L., Prade, H.: Analogical proportions and square of oppositions. In: Laurent, A.: et al., (ed.) Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Information Processing and Management of Uncertainty in Knowledge-Based Systems, July 15–19, Montpellier, CCIS, vol. 443, pp. 324–334, Springer (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Moraga, C., Trillas, E., Guadarrama, S.: Multiple-valued logic and artificial intelligence fundamentals of fuzzy control revisited. Artif. Intell. Rev. 20(3–4), 169–197 (2003)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Murinová, P., Novák, V.: The analysis of the generalized square of opposition. In: Montero, J., Pasi, G., Ciucci, D., (eds.) EUSFLAT Conference, Atlantis Press (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Murinová, P., Novák, V.: Analysis of generalized square of opposition with intermediate quantifiers. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 242, 89–113 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Parsons, T.: The traditional square of opposition. In: Zalta, E.N. (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Pizzi, C.: Contingency logics and modal squares of opposition. In: Beziau, J.-Y., Gan-Krzywoszyńska, K. (eds.) Handbook of Abstracts of the 3rd World Congress on the Square of Opposition, Beirut, 26–30 June, pp. 29–30 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ruspini, E.H.: A new approach to clustering. Inf. Control 15(1), 22–32 (1969)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Schweizer, B., Sklar, A.: Probabilistic Metric Spaces. North-Holland (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Trillas, E.: Sobre funciones de negacion en la theoria de conjuntos difusos. Stochastica III, 47–60 (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Trillas, E., Alsina, C.: Some remarks on approximate entailment. Int. J. Approx. Reason. 6(4), 525–533 (1992)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Tsoukiàs, A.: A first order, four-valued, weakly paraconsistent logic and its relation with rough set semantics. In: Foundations of Computing and Decision Sciences 27 (2002), no. 2, 77–96, Cahiers du LAMSADE, University Paris-Dauphine (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Turunen, E., Öztürk, M., Tsoukiàs, A.: Paraconsistent semantics for Pavelka-style fuzzy sentential logic. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 161(14), 1926–1940 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Zadeh, L.A.: Similarity relations and fuzzy orderings. Inf. Sci. 3, 177–200 (1971)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. Zadeh, L.A.: Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 1, 3–28 (1978)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Henri Prade .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dubois, D., Prade, H. (2015). Gradual Structures of Oppositions. In: Magdalena, L., Verdegay, J., Esteva, F. (eds) Enric Trillas: A Passion for Fuzzy Sets. Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, vol 322. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16235-5_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16235-5_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-16234-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-16235-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics