Skip to main content

Resistance and Flow

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Submarine Hydrodynamics

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology ((BRIEFSAPPLSCIENCES))

  • 2175 Accesses

Abstract

The flow over a submarine will influence its top speed, its acoustic signature, and the effectiveness of its own sensors. In particular, flow separation should be avoided. The various components of resistance include: surface friction; form drag; induced drag; and wave making resistance. The latter only becomes important when the submarine is operating on, or close to, the water surface. The effect of the hull form on the various components of resistance is discussed, and it is shown that a teardrop hull may not always be the best solution. A submarine hull is usually considered in three parts: fore body; parallel middle body; and aft body. The main driver for the hydrodynamic design of the fore body is to control the flow such that there is laminar flow over the sonar array. A fuller fore body may be beneficial for this. The length of the parallel middle body influences the length to diameter ratio, and it is shown that there is an optimum value of the L/D to minimise resistance, depending on the hull form. The aft body shape can be characterised by the half tail cone angle, which defines its fullness. The primary aim of the design of the aft body is to avoid flow separation, and ensure good flow into the propulsor. Model testing and Computational Fluid Dynamics techniques are discussed. In addition, an empirical method of predicting the resistance of a submarine, suitable for use in the early stage of the design, is presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Kormilitsin YN, Khalizev OA (2001) Theory of submarine design. Saint Petersburg State Maritime Technical University, Russia

    Google Scholar 

  • Leong ZQ, Ranmuthugala D, Renilson MR (2015) Resistance as a function of L/D ratio characteristics for various axisymmetrical hull forms. Australian Maritime College, Tasmania, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Renilson MR, Ranmuthugala D (2012) The effect of proximity to free surface on the optimum length/diameter ratio for a submarine. In: First international conference on submarine technology and marine robotics (STaMR 2012), Chennai, 13–14 Jan 2012

    Google Scholar 

  • Seil GJ, Anderson B (2012) A comparison of submarine fin geometry on the performance of a generic submarine. In: Proceedings of Pacific 2012 international maritime conference, Sydney, 2012

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren CL, Thomas MW (2000) Submarine hull form optimisation case study. Naval Eng J 112(6):27–39

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin Renilson .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Renilson, M. (2015). Resistance and Flow. In: Submarine Hydrodynamics. SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16184-6_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16184-6_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-16183-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-16184-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics