Abstract
The flow over a submarine will influence its top speed, its acoustic signature, and the effectiveness of its own sensors. In particular, flow separation should be avoided. The various components of resistance include: surface friction; form drag; induced drag; and wave making resistance. The latter only becomes important when the submarine is operating on, or close to, the water surface. The effect of the hull form on the various components of resistance is discussed, and it is shown that a teardrop hull may not always be the best solution. A submarine hull is usually considered in three parts: fore body; parallel middle body; and aft body. The main driver for the hydrodynamic design of the fore body is to control the flow such that there is laminar flow over the sonar array. A fuller fore body may be beneficial for this. The length of the parallel middle body influences the length to diameter ratio, and it is shown that there is an optimum value of the L/D to minimise resistance, depending on the hull form. The aft body shape can be characterised by the half tail cone angle, which defines its fullness. The primary aim of the design of the aft body is to avoid flow separation, and ensure good flow into the propulsor. Model testing and Computational Fluid Dynamics techniques are discussed. In addition, an empirical method of predicting the resistance of a submarine, suitable for use in the early stage of the design, is presented.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Kormilitsin YN, Khalizev OA (2001) Theory of submarine design. Saint Petersburg State Maritime Technical University, Russia
Leong ZQ, Ranmuthugala D, Renilson MR (2015) Resistance as a function of L/D ratio characteristics for various axisymmetrical hull forms. Australian Maritime College, Tasmania, Australia
Renilson MR, Ranmuthugala D (2012) The effect of proximity to free surface on the optimum length/diameter ratio for a submarine. In: First international conference on submarine technology and marine robotics (STaMR 2012), Chennai, 13–14 Jan 2012
Seil GJ, Anderson B (2012) A comparison of submarine fin geometry on the performance of a generic submarine. In: Proceedings of Pacific 2012 international maritime conference, Sydney, 2012
Warren CL, Thomas MW (2000) Submarine hull form optimisation case study. Naval Eng J 112(6):27–39
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Renilson, M. (2015). Resistance and Flow. In: Submarine Hydrodynamics. SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16184-6_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16184-6_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-16183-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-16184-6
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)