Abstract
Perhaps unlike other professions, engineering is strangely difficult to define or describe. This is nowhere as evident as when an attempt is made to articulate its epistemological basis. Engineering has a rich and complex ‘gene pool’ which goes back to when people first built shelters and shaped implements for agricultural purposes. Throughout the ages one constant characteristic of engineering has been its readiness to avail of whatever material is on hand together with whatever knowledge or skill is available to meet the challenge of enhancing an object or making something which never previously existed. On occasion engineers have created new knowledge but for the most part they have been users of knowledge: borrowing from nature, science, mathematics, arts in order to meet their requirements to solve specific problems. The art of engineering is in the appropriate selection of knowledge coupled with an ability to use that knowledge in achieving an objective. A three-layer model is proposed to describe the epistemological basis of engineering. This layer consists of a foundational layer containing subject material such as mathematics and science, above which is a middle-layer largely populated by domain knowledge associated with engineering program learning outcomes, and with the final top layer acting as a capstone and expressed in terms of professional competences.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Atman, C., Sheppard, S., Turns, J., Adams, R., Fleming, L., Stevens, R., Streveler, R., Smith, K., Miller, R., Leifer, J., Yasuhara, K., & Lund, D. (2010). Enabling engineering student success – The final report for the Centre for the Advancement of Engineering Education. San Rafael: Morgan & Claypool Publishers.
Boswell, J. (1791). The life of Samuel Johnson. http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/1564
Bucciarelli, L., Coyle, E., & McGrath, D. (2009). Engineering education in the US and the EU. In S. H. Christensen, B. Delahousse, & M. Meganck (Eds.), Engineering in context (Vol. 5). Aarhus: Academica.
Christensen, S. H., & Newberry, B. (2015). The role of research in academic drift processes in European and American professional engineering education outside the university sector. In S. H. Christensen, C. Didier, A. Jamison, M. Meganck, C. Mitcham, & B. Newberry (Eds.), International perspectives on engineering education: Engineering education and practice in context (Vol. 1). Dordrecht: Springer.
De Figueiredo, A. D. (2008). Toward an epistemology of engineering. Workshop on philosophy & engineering. London: Royal Academy of Engineering. http://www.slideshare.net/adfigueiredo/toward-an-epistemology-of-engineering-presentation
Engineers Ireland. (2012). Chartered engineer. Regulations for the title of chartered engineer (pp. 22–27). www.engineersireland.ie/EngineersIreland/media/SiteMedia/membership/professional-titles/Chartered-Engineer-Regulations-2012.pdf. Accessed 29 Aug 2013.
European Network for Accreditation of Engineering Education (ENAEE). (2013). The EUR-ACE system. http://www.enaee.eu/eur-ace-system. Accessed 29 Aug 2013.
Fox, M., & Huang, J. (2003). Knowledge provenance: An approach to modelling and maintaining the evolution and validity of knowledge. EIL Technical Report, University of Toronto.
Grimson, W., & Murphy, M. (2009). An evolutionary perspective on engineering design. In S. H. Christensen, B. Delahousse, & M. Meganck (Eds.), Engineering in context (Vol. 13). Aarhus: Academica.
Grimson, W., & Murphy, M. (2013). A Hippocratic oath for engineers. In D. Michelfelder, N. McCarthy, & D. Goldberg (Eds.), Philosophy and engineering: Reflections on practice, principles, and process (Vol. 15). Dordrecht: Springer.
Heymann, M. (2009). “Art” or science? Competing claims in the history of engineering design. In S. H. Christensen, B. Delahousse, & M. Meganck (Eds.), Engineering in context (Vol. 11). Aarhus: Academica.
Koen, B. V. (2003). Discussion of the method: Conducting the engineer’s approach to problem solving. New York: Oxford University Press.
Petroski, H. (1985). To engineer is human: The role of failure in successful design. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Polanyi, M. (1958). Personal knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Zbigniew, M., & Fogel, D. B. (2004). How to solve it: Modern heuristics (2nd ed.). Berlin: Springer.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Grimson, W., Murphy, M. (2015). The Epistemological Basis of Engineering, and Its Reflection in the Modern Engineering Curriculum. In: Christensen, S., Didier, C., Jamison, A., Meganck, M., Mitcham, C., Newberry, B. (eds) Engineering Identities, Epistemologies and Values. Philosophy of Engineering and Technology, vol 21. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16172-3_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16172-3_9
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-16171-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-16172-3
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)