Abstract
Engineering design is an essential part of the process of constructing and maintaining modern complex systems as airplanes, power plants, and urban areas. As such engineering design must be based on scientific knowledge. But whereas it is the task of engineering design to assist in the realization of complex systems in their concrete real life context, it is the task of science and mathematics to find and justify new knowledge about the universal working of nature. In a science as physics mathematical structures and formalisms are developed and applied as means to identify and describe the form and nature of laws that govern the behavior of processes of very different scales in nature. This work requires comprehensive abstraction and idealization, and, as a consequence of that, advanced mathematical and physical theories are only valid in highly abstract and isolated systems. Consequently, these theories are far away from the concrete contexts that engineering design is about. In this paper we shall identify and discuss some of the epistemological problems that this tension between scientific idealization and engineering concretization may lead to.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
A theoretical framework is one way of modifying Kuhn’s concept of paradigm. Today there exist several other ways of generalizing or modifying Kuhn’s idea. One is Bucciarelli’s concept of object world in Bucciarelli (1994). Another one is the concept of a technical matrix in Hendricks et al. (2000).
References
Andreasen, B. S. (1988). Anchorage of ribbed reinforced bars. Lyngby: Department of Structural Engineering, Technical University of Denmark.
Bucciarelli, L. L. (1994). Designing engineers. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
de Solla Price, D. J. (1975). Science since Babylon. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Heisenberg, W. (1972). Physics and beyond. New York: Harper Torchbooks.
Hendricks, V., Jakobsen, A., & Pedersen, S. A. (2000). Identification of matrixes in science and engineering. Journal for General Philosophy of Science, 31(2), 277–305.
Johansen, K. W. (1943). Brudlinieteorier. Technical University of Denmark, Denmark.
Nersessian, N. (1992). How do scientists think? Capturing the dynamics of conceptual change in science. In R. N. Giere (Ed.), Cognitive models in science (pp. 3–44). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Polanyi, M. (1958). Personal knowledge. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Thomsen, J. J. (1990). Modelling human tibia structural vibrations. Journal of Biomechanics, 23(3), 215–228.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pedersen, S.A. (2015). The Tension Between Science and Engineering Design. In: Christensen, S., Didier, C., Jamison, A., Meganck, M., Mitcham, C., Newberry, B. (eds) Engineering Identities, Epistemologies and Values. Philosophy of Engineering and Technology, vol 21. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16172-3_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16172-3_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-16171-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-16172-3
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)