Abstract
Discussions about reform in engineering education have mainly centered on issues of curriculum and didactics but these discussions rarely address fundamental questions about the nature and character of knowledge and learning. This neglect has led the discussions down the wrong track and failed to critique implicit and inadequate conceptions of knowledge and learning. Our discussion will draw upon John Dewey’s philosophy of human experience and inquiry as a resource that can remedy the neglect. This chapter thus focuses on learning and by example proposes ways that engineering knowledge and skills can be contextualized, taught – and learned.
When I heard the learn’d astronomer;
When the proofs, the figures, were ranged in columns before me;
When I was shown the charts and the diagrams, to add, divide, and measure them;
When I, sitting, heard the astronomer, where he lectured with much applause in the lecture-room;
How soon, unaccountable, I became tired and sick;
Till rising and gliding out, I wander’d off by myself,
In the mystical moist night-air, and from time to time,
Look’d up in perfect silence at the stars
Walt Whitman (1819–1892). Leaves of Grass, 1900
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
This chapter draws on and includes sections from Louis Bucciarelli’s (2012) Bachelor of Arts in Engineering – the Full Proposal.
- 2.
The critique of this epistemology is elaborated in Bucciarelli 2003, p. 43 ff.
- 3.
This tri-partite structure is not meant as a rigid template for contextualizing engineering education. Our organization is patterned on Sheppard et al. (2009).
- 4.
Such learning is essential to moving beyond simplistic analyses of failure as well. To understand events, to move beyond myth-making about whistle-blowing, to prepare students for recognizing the antecedents of, and sociology of mistakes, one might start with Vaughan’s summary analysis, contained in her final chapter (Vaughan 1997). There she talks about “paradigm” and “structural” (not engineering structure, but sociological), and “script” and “social construction” and “culture” and how to do good history (ethically), and calls upon the insights of authors like Kuhn, Latour, Geertz – so they need to be read and evaluated if one is to grasp the full force of her analysis.
- 5.
The phrase suggests the technology is made independent of culture, put out on the market, then does its work, has impacts – like it had a life of its own. A “softer” vision of the interaction of technology and culture is required.
- 6.
Latour and Woolgar, Peter Galison, Terry Shinn, Davis Baird all tell different stories but in each case the instrument is an agent of more than measurement.
References
Bayard, D. (2000). How to make chance manageable: Statistical thinking and cognitive devices in manufacturing control. In M. R. Levin (Ed.), Cultures of control (pp. 153–176). Amsterdam: Harwood Academic.
Beer, F. P., Johnston, E. R., Jr., & DeWolf, J. T. (2006). Mechanics of materials (4th ed.). London: McGraw-Hill.
Bucciarelli, L. (2003). Engineering philosophy. Delft: Delft University Press.
Bucciarelli, L. (2012). Bachelor of arts in engineering – The full proposal. http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/71008
Buch, A. (2012). Governing engineering. In S. H. Christensen, C. Mitcham, L. Bocong, & Y. An (Eds.), Engineering, development and philosophy: American, Chinese, and European perspectives. Dordrecht: Springer.
Burr, W. H. (1893). The ideal engineering education. Proceedings of the society for the promotion of engineering education (Vol. 1, Section E). Chicago, 31 July–5 Aug 1893.
Cook, S. D. N., & Brown, J. S. (1999). Bridging epistemologies: The generative dance between organizational knowledge and organizational knowing. Organization Science, 10(4), 381–400.
De Santillana, G. (1955). The crime of Galileo. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Descartes, R. (2012). Oeuvres Complètes de René Descartes. Electronic edition, Correspondence 1619–1650, Descartes to Mersenne: Oct 11 1638.
Dewey, J. (1938). Logic: The theory of inquiry. New York: Henry Holt and Company.
Dewey, J. (1948). Reconstructions in philosophy. Boston: Beacon.
Dewey, J. (2005). How we think. New York: Barnes and Noble.
Dewey, J. (2008). Experience and nature. In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), The later works of John Dewey (Vol. 1). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
Dewey, J., & Bentley, A. (1991). Knowing and the known. In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), The later works of John Dewey (Vol. 16, pp. 1–294). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
Downey, G. (2005). Are engineers losing control of technology? Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 83(A6), 583–595.
Engineering Council for Undergraduate Education. (2005). From useful abstractions to useful designs – Thoughts on the foundations of the engineering method. Part I, Draft, 7 May.
Franssen, M. (2005). Arrow’s theorem, multi-criteria decision problems and multi-attribute design problems in engineering design. Research in Engineering Design, 16, 42–56.
Hacking, I. (1975). Emergence of probability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hacking, I. (1990). The taming of chance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kelt, T. (1866). The mechanistic text-book and engineer’s practical guide. http://books.google.com/books?id=LiwIAAAAIAAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=thomas+kelt&lr=&cd=1#v=onepage&q=&f=false
Sheppard, S. D., Macatanguay, K., Colby, A., & Sullivan, W. M. (2009). Educating engineers. Designing for the future of the field. A report of the Carnegie foundation for the advancement of teaching. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
Turkle, S. (2011). Alone together, why we expect more from technology and less from each other. New York: Basic Books.
Vaughan, D. (1997). The challenger launch decision: Risky technology culture and deviance at NASA. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Buch, A., Bucciarelli, L.L. (2015). Getting Context Back in Engineering Education. In: Christensen, S., Didier, C., Jamison, A., Meganck, M., Mitcham, C., Newberry, B. (eds) International Perspectives on Engineering Education. Philosophy of Engineering and Technology, vol 20. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16169-3_24
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16169-3_24
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-16168-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-16169-3
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)