Skip to main content

Getting Context Back in Engineering Education

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Philosophy of Engineering and Technology ((POET,volume 20))

Abstract

Discussions about reform in engineering education have mainly centered on issues of curriculum and didactics but these discussions rarely address fundamental questions about the nature and character of knowledge and learning. This neglect has led the discussions down the wrong track and failed to critique implicit and inadequate conceptions of knowledge and learning. Our discussion will draw upon John Dewey’s philosophy of human experience and inquiry as a resource that can remedy the neglect. This chapter thus focuses on learning and by example proposes ways that engineering knowledge and skills can be contextualized, taught – and learned.

When I heard the learn’d astronomer;

When the proofs, the figures, were ranged in columns before me;

When I was shown the charts and the diagrams, to add, divide, and measure them;

When I, sitting, heard the astronomer, where he lectured with much applause in the lecture-room;

How soon, unaccountable, I became tired and sick;

Till rising and gliding out, I wander’d off by myself,

In the mystical moist night-air, and from time to time,

Look’d up in perfect silence at the stars

Walt Whitman (1819–1892). Leaves of Grass, 1900

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This chapter draws on and includes sections from Louis Bucciarelli’s (2012) Bachelor of Arts in Engineering – the Full Proposal.

  2. 2.

    The critique of this epistemology is elaborated in Bucciarelli 2003, p. 43 ff.

  3. 3.

    This tri-partite structure is not meant as a rigid template for contextualizing engineering education. Our organization is patterned on Sheppard et al. (2009).

  4. 4.

    Such learning is essential to moving beyond simplistic analyses of failure as well. To understand events, to move beyond myth-making about whistle-blowing, to prepare students for recognizing the antecedents of, and sociology of mistakes, one might start with Vaughan’s summary analysis, contained in her final chapter (Vaughan 1997). There she talks about “paradigm” and “structural” (not engineering structure, but sociological), and “script” and “social construction” and “culture” and how to do good history (ethically), and calls upon the insights of authors like Kuhn, Latour, Geertz – so they need to be read and evaluated if one is to grasp the full force of her analysis.

  5. 5.

    The phrase suggests the technology is made independent of culture, put out on the market, then does its work, has impacts – like it had a life of its own. A “softer” vision of the interaction of technology and culture is required.

  6. 6.

    Latour and Woolgar, Peter Galison, Terry Shinn, Davis Baird all tell different stories but in each case the instrument is an agent of more than measurement.

References

  • Bayard, D. (2000). How to make chance manageable: Statistical thinking and cognitive devices in manufacturing control. In M. R. Levin (Ed.), Cultures of control (pp. 153–176). Amsterdam: Harwood Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beer, F. P., Johnston, E. R., Jr., & DeWolf, J. T. (2006). Mechanics of materials (4th ed.). London: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bucciarelli, L. (2003). Engineering philosophy. Delft: Delft University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bucciarelli, L. (2012). Bachelor of arts in engineering – The full proposal. http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/71008

  • Buch, A. (2012). Governing engineering. In S. H. Christensen, C. Mitcham, L. Bocong, & Y. An (Eds.), Engineering, development and philosophy: American, Chinese, and European perspectives. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burr, W. H. (1893). The ideal engineering education. Proceedings of the society for the promotion of engineering education (Vol. 1, Section E). Chicago, 31 July–5 Aug 1893.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, S. D. N., & Brown, J. S. (1999). Bridging epistemologies: The generative dance between organizational knowledge and organizational knowing. Organization Science, 10(4), 381–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Santillana, G. (1955). The crime of Galileo. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Descartes, R. (2012). Oeuvres Complètes de René Descartes. Electronic edition, Correspondence 1619–1650, Descartes to Mersenne: Oct 11 1638.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1938). Logic: The theory of inquiry. New York: Henry Holt and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1948). Reconstructions in philosophy. Boston: Beacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (2005). How we think. New York: Barnes and Noble.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (2008). Experience and nature. In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), The later works of John Dewey (Vol. 1). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J., & Bentley, A. (1991). Knowing and the known. In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), The later works of John Dewey (Vol. 16, pp. 1–294). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downey, G. (2005). Are engineers losing control of technology? Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 83(A6), 583–595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engineering Council for Undergraduate Education. (2005). From useful abstractions to useful designs – Thoughts on the foundations of the engineering method. Part I, Draft, 7 May.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franssen, M. (2005). Arrow’s theorem, multi-criteria decision problems and multi-attribute design problems in engineering design. Research in Engineering Design, 16, 42–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hacking, I. (1975). Emergence of probability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacking, I. (1990). The taming of chance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kelt, T. (1866). The mechanistic text-book and engineer’s practical guide. http://books.google.com/books?id=LiwIAAAAIAAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=thomas+kelt&lr=&cd=1#v=onepage&q=&f=false

  • Sheppard, S. D., Macatanguay, K., Colby, A., & Sullivan, W. M. (2009). Educating engineers. Designing for the future of the field. A report of the Carnegie foundation for the advancement of teaching. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turkle, S. (2011). Alone together, why we expect more from technology and less from each other. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan, D. (1997). The challenger launch decision: Risky technology culture and deviance at NASA. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anders Buch .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Buch, A., Bucciarelli, L.L. (2015). Getting Context Back in Engineering Education. In: Christensen, S., Didier, C., Jamison, A., Meganck, M., Mitcham, C., Newberry, B. (eds) International Perspectives on Engineering Education. Philosophy of Engineering and Technology, vol 20. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16169-3_24

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics