Abstract
This chapter describes an example of teaching engineering students social perspectives of engineering by using the case example of wind technology. It is part of the philosophy of engineering course taught to undergraduate engineering students at Aarhus University. The case of wind technology development is suited to discuss a large number of different social issues related to engineering, such as engineering approaches (science-based versus practice-oriented), the role of engineering styles and traditions, forms of learning and interaction in engineering, requirements and problems of engineering communication , innovation strategies, research policies, market structures and ideologies. The case of wind technology shows that engineering is more than developing technical artifacts. It is a way of “mixing with the world” in a much broader sense than reflected in many engineering curricula.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Andersen, H., Klostergaard, L., Knudsen, H., Kragh, H., Nielsen, K., Pedersen, K., Møller, S., & Kragh, H. (2009). Vedkommende videnskabsteori. Aktuel Naturvidenskab, 1, 32–35.
California Energy Commission. (1988). Results from the wind project performance reporting system. 1986 Annual report. Sacramento: California Energy Commission.
Collins, H. (2010). Tacit and explicit knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Ehrlenspiel, K. (2003). Integrierte Produktentwicklung. Methoden für Prozeßorganisation, Produkterstellung und Konstruktion. München: Carl Hanser Verlag.
Ferguson, E. S. (1992). Engineering and the mind’s eye. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Garud, R., & Karnøe, P. (2003). Bricolage versus breakthrough: Distributed and embedded agency in technology entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 32(2), 277–300.
Godin, B. (2010). National innovation system: The system approach in historical perspective. Science, Technology and Human Values, 35, 476–501.
Hård, M., & Jamison, A. (2005). Hubris and hybrids: A cultural history of technology and science. New York: Routledge.
Heymann, M. (1995). Die Geschichte der Windenergienutzung 1890–1990. Campus: Frankfurt am Main.
Heymann, M. (1996). Technisches Wissen, Orientierungen und Mentalitäten: Hintergründe zur Mißerfolgsgeschichte der Windenergietechnik im 20. Jahrhundert. Technikgeschichte, 63(3), 237–254.
Heymann, M. (1998). Signs of Hubris – The shaping of wind technology styles in Germany, Denmark, and the United States, 1940–1990. Technology and Culture, 39(4), 641–670.
Heymann, M. (1999). A fight of systems? Wind power and electric power systems in Denmark, Germany, and the USA. Centaurus, 41(1–2), 112–136.
Heymann, M. (2005). Kunst und Wissenschaft in der Technik des 20. Jahrhunderts. Zur Geschichte der Konstruktionswissenschaften. Zürich: Chronos.
Heymann, M. (2009). “Art” or science? Competing claims in the history of engineering design. In S. H. Christensen, M. Meganck, & B. Delahousse (Eds.), Engineering in context (pp. 227–244). Aarhus: Academica.
Ibenholt, K. (2002). Explaining learning curves for wind power. Energy Policy, 30, 1181–1189.
Jamison, A. (2001). The making of green knowledge: Environmental politics and cultural transformation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Jamison, A., Christensen, S. H., & Botin, L. (2011). A hybrid imagination: Science and technology in cultural perspective. Morgan and Claypool. Available online at http://www.morganclaypool.com/doi/abs/10.2200/S00339ED1V01Y201104ETS016
Kamp, L. M., Smits, R. E. H. M., & Andriesse, C. D. (2004). Notions on learning applied to wind turbine development in the Netherlands and Denmark. Energy Policy, 32(14), 1625–1637.
Karnøe, P. (1991). Dansk Vindmølleindustri – en overraskende international succes. Om innovationer, industriudvikling og teknologipolitik. Frederiksberg: Samfundslitteratur.
Lovins, A. B. (1977). Soft energy paths: Toward a durable peace. New York: Harper Colophon Books.
Lucas, N., & Papaconstantinou, D. (1985). Western European energy policies: A comparative study of the influence of institutional structure on technical change. Oxford: Clarendon.
Neukirch, M. (2010). Die internationale Pionierphase der Windenergienutzung. Dissertation Georg-August University of Göttingen. http://webdoc.sub.gwdg.de/diss/2010/neukirch/neukirch.pdf. Accessed 12 Feb 2013.
Nielsen, K. H., & Heymann, M. (2012). Winds of change: Communication and wind power technology development in Denmark and Germany from 1973 to ca. 1985. Engineering Studies, 4(1), 11–31.
Polanyi, M. (1966). The tacit dimension. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Schumacher, E.-F. (1973). Small is beautiful. A study of economics as if people mattered. New York: Harper & Row.
Sørensen, H. K. (2012). Making philosophy of science relevant for science students. Research publications on science studies, No. 18, Centre for Science Studies, Aarhus University. http://css.au.dk/fileadmin/reposs/reposs-018.pdf. Accessed 12 Feb 2012.
Staudenmaier, J. M. (1985). Technology’s storytellers. Reweaving the human fabric. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Stoddard, F. S. (1986). The California experience. Proceedings of the DANWEA conference 1986, (pp. 83–101). Copenhagen: Centec Business Consultants.
Ulijn, J. M., & Weggeman, M. (2001). Towards an innovation culture: What are its national, corporate, marketing and engineering aspects: Some experimental evidence. In C. L. Cooper, S. Cartwright, & P. C. Earley (Eds.), The international handbook of organizational culture and climate (pp. 487–517). London: Wiley.
Wengenroth, U. (2001). Vom Innovationssystem zur Innovationskultur. Perspektivwechsel in der Innovationsforschung. In J. Abele, G. Barkleit, & T. Hänseroth (Eds.), Innovationskulturen und Fortschrittserwartungen im geteilten Deutschland (pp. 23–32). Köln: Böhlau.
Winner, L. (1980). Do artifacts have politics? Daedalus, 109(1), 121–136. Republished 1986 in: Winner, L. (Ed.). The whale and the reactor, a search for limits in an age of high technology (pp. 19–39). Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Acknowledgements
The writing of this chapter was made possible by a grant from the The Danish Council for Strategic Research (DSF) to the Program of Research on Opportunities and Challenges in Engineering Education in Denmark (PROCEED).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Heymann, M. (2015). Engineering as a Socio-technical Process: Case-Based Learning from the Example of Wind Technology Development. In: Christensen, S., Didier, C., Jamison, A., Meganck, M., Mitcham, C., Newberry, B. (eds) International Perspectives on Engineering Education. Philosophy of Engineering and Technology, vol 20. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16169-3_23
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16169-3_23
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-16168-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-16169-3
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)