Skip to main content

Implementing Social Awareness into Engineering Curricula

  • Chapter
Book cover International Perspectives on Engineering Education

Abstract

The inclusion of competences related to social context in engineers’ education has been recommended by several organizations and authors. Among these abilities appears the development of reflective and behavioral skills or the awareness of public debate in engineering. In order to create an engineer profile with expanded social commitment, some criteria have been implemented by accreditation boards.

In this chapter, we will review these criteria and requirements, analyze how they contribute to the future engineering profile, how universities have approached the inclusion of the new contents in their syllabi and identify the difficulties that this may present in real practice. A reflective digression on the need of going beyond the ethics, the habitus of the engineering profession, the implicit values in education and the existing gap between engineers and society is also included. Finally, the subject is illustrated with the description of engineering in Spain and the results of interviews with the presidents of professional engineering associations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • ABET Engineering Accreditation Commission. (2011). Criteria for accrediting engineering programs. http://www.abet.org

  • Atman, C., & Nair, I. (1996). Engineering in context: An empirical study of freshmen students’ conceptual frameworks. Journal of Engineering Education, 85(4), 317–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. (2009). How to think about science, episode 5 – Ulrich Beck and Bruno Latour. In How to think about science. Ideas with Paul Kennedy, CBCRadio. http://www.cbc.ca/ideas/episodes/2009/01/02/how-to-think-about-science-part-1---24-listen/#episode5

  • Beder, S. (1999). Beyond technicalities: Expanding engineering thinking. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 125(1), American Society of Civil Engineers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergen Communiqué. (2005). The European higher education area – Achieving the goals. Communiqué of the Conference of European Ministers Responsible for Higher Education. http://www.ehea.info/Uploads/Declarations/Bergen_Communique1.pdf

  • Bourdieu, P. ([1972] 1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brady, P. A., & Lawson, J. W. (2011). Using case studies to characterize the broader meaning of engineering design for today’s student architectural engineering education. Architectural engineering conference proceedings: Oakland, CA. Available at: http://works.bepress.com/jwlawson/8

  • Brumsen, M. (2005). Ethics in engineering in the Netherlands: The role of professional associations, universities, and law. International Journal of Engineering Education, 21(3), 391–401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canadian Engineering Accreditation Board. (2011). Accreditation criteria and procedures. http://www.engineerscanada.ca/e/index.cfm

  • Catalano, G. D. (2006). Engineering ethics: Peace, justice, and the earth (Synthesis lectures on engineering, technology and society). San Rafael: Morgan and Claypool.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, S. H. (2003). Two cultures – Engineering and business: Towards a theory of occupational culture. In S. H. Christensen et al. (Eds.), Profession, culture and communication: An interdisciplinary challenge to business and engineering (pp. 3–92). Herning: Institute of Business and Technology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duderstadt, J. (2008). Engineering for a changing world. A roadmap to the future of engineering practice, research, and education. Ann Arbor: The Millennium Project, University of Michigan. http://milproj.ummu.umich.edu/publications/EngFlex_report/download/EngFlex%20Report.pdf

  • Edwards, M., Sánchez-Ruiz, L. M., & Sánchez-Díaz, C. (2009). Achieving competence-based curriculum in engineering education in Spain. Proceedings of the IEEE, 97(10), 1727–1736.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EET. (2013). Document available at http://www.eet.upc.edu/courses/bachelors-degree-programmes/information-on-courses/development-and-assessment-of-generic-competencies?set_language=en

  • Engineering Accreditation Council (EAC) Malaysia. (2008). Determining accreditation decision. http://www.eac.org.my/web/document/Determining%20Accreditation%20Decision.pdf

  • Engineers Australia Accreditation Board. (2008). Accreditation management system education programs at the level of professional engineer. http://www.engineersaustralia.org.au/nerb/board

  • European Association for Quality Assurance in Higher Education (ENQA). (2005). Standards and guidelines for quality assurance in the European Higher Education Area. http://www.enqa.eu/index.php/home/esg/

  • European Network for Accreditation of Engineering Education ENAEE. (2008). Framework standards for the accreditation of engineering programmes. http://www.enaee.eu/

  • Herkert, J. R. (2002). Continuing and emerging issues in engineering ethics education. The Bridge (National Academy of Engineering), 32(3), 8–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Illich, I. (1973). Tools for conviviality. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamison, A., Christensen, S. H., & Botin, L. (2011). A hybrid imagination: Science and technology in cultural perspective. San Rafael: Morgan & Claypool.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C., Saha, K., Evans S., & Pfister, T. (2011). A provocation. The next 20 and beyond: Provocations from within the field. STS 20+20 conference. Harvard University. http://stsnext20.org/conference/a-provocation/

  • Mitcham, C. (1998). The importance of philosophy to engineering. Teorema, 17(3), 27–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nahar, Y., Baillie, C., Catalano, G., & Feinblatt, E. (2009). Engineering values: An approach to explore values in education and practice. http://rees2009.pbworks.com/f/rees2009_submission_3.pdf

  • Paretti, M. C., & Burgoyne, C. B. (2005). Work in progress – An integrated engineering communications curriculum for the 21st century. Proceedings 35th annual conference frontiers in education (FIE ‘05) (pp. F3F-5). http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=1612098&isnumber=33854

  • Peercy, P. S., & Cramer, S. M. (2011). Redefining quality in engineering education through hybrid instruction. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(4), 625–629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prausnitz, J. M. (2003). Towards breaking the silence between the two cultures: Engineering and the other humanities. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. Retrieved from http://escholarship.org/uc/item/30831547. June 2012.

  • RD1393/2007 REAL DECRETO. (2007). de 29 de octubre, por el que se establece la ordenación de las enseñanzas universitarias oficiales. http://www.boe.es/boe/dias/2007/10/30/pdfs/A44037-44048.pdf

  • Revel, M. (2007). The necessity for engineers to engage in public issues of global importance. In S. H. Christensen, M. Meganck, & B. Delahousse (Eds.), Philosophy in engineering. Aarhus: Academica. Chapter 14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riley, D. (2011). Engineering thermodynamics and 21st century energy problems: A textbook companion for student engagement (Synthesis lectures on engineering). San Rafael: Morgan and Claypool.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sennett, R. (1998). The corrosion of character. The personal consequences of work in the new capitalism. London/New York: W.W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suarez, B., Revilla, J. A., & Galan, L. (2011). Quality assessment in engineering education in Spain: Towards a new accreditation agency. First EUCEET association conference: “New trends and challenges in civil engineering education”, Patras.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Royal Academy of Engineering. (2009). Engineering values in IT: A joint study by The Royal Academy of Engineering, the Institution of Engineering and Technology, and the British Computer Society. www.raeng.org.uk/engineeringIT

  • UNED (Escuela de Ingenieros Industriales). (s.d.). Ética Profesional. http://portal.uned.es/portal/page?_pageid=93,5972357&_dad=portal&_schema=PORTAL

  • Winner, L. (1986). The whale and the reactor. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winner, L. (2010). Local citizens against global, corporate power. The role of neighborhood science between local community and global corporations. Medialab Prado. Lecture available at http://medialab-prado.es/mmedia/5179/view

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Javier Cañavate .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cañavate, J., Lis Arias, M.J., Casasús, J.M. (2015). Implementing Social Awareness into Engineering Curricula. In: Christensen, S., Didier, C., Jamison, A., Meganck, M., Mitcham, C., Newberry, B. (eds) International Perspectives on Engineering Education. Philosophy of Engineering and Technology, vol 20. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16169-3_22

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics