Skip to main content

Wave Filtering and Dynamic Positioning of Marine Vessels Using a Linear Design Model: Theory and Experiments

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Operations Research/Computer Science Interfaces Series ((ORCS,volume 58))

Abstract

This chapter describes a procedure to obtain an improved design model of ships subjected to the influence of currents and sea waves. The model structure is at the heart of the application of new techniques in control and estimation theory to the problem of Dynamic Positioning (DP) and wave filtering of marine vessels. The model proposed captures the physics of the problem at hand in an effective manner and includes the sea state as an uncertain parameter. This allows for the design of advanced control and estimation algorithms to solve the DP and wave filtering problems under different sea conditions. Numerical simulations, carried out using a high fidelity nonlinear DP system simulator, illustrate the performance improvement in wave filtering as a result of the use of the proposed model. Furthermore, using Monte-Carlo simulations the performance of three DP controllers, designed based on the plant model developed, is evaluated for different sea conditions. The first controller is a nonlinear multivariable PID controller with a passive observer. The second controller is of the Linear Quadratic Gaussian type and the third controller builds on \(\mathcal{H}_{\infty }\) control techniques using the mixed-μ synthesis methodology. The theoretical results are experimentally verified and the performance of wave filtering in DP systems operated with the controllers designed for different sea conditions are further examined by model testing a DP operated ship, the Cybership III, in a towing tank equipped with a hydraulic wavemaker.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In six degrees-of-freedom dynamics, (17.8) is written as \(M(w)\ddot{\eta }_{R\omega } + D_{p}(w)\dot{\eta }_{R\omega } + G\eta _{R\omega } =\tau _{\text{wave1}}\), where \(G \in \mathbb{R}^{6\times 6}\) is the linearized restoring coefficient matrix due to the gravity and buoyancy affecting heave, roll, and pitch only (see [26] for more details). Throughout this chapter a three degrees-of-freedom dynamics is used for the design purposes, while a six degrees-of-freedom dynamics is used in the simulation.

  2. 2.

    It is worth to mention that the evolution of the WF components of motion, given by (17.1) and (17.2), are in fact a simplification of (17.8) and (17.9).

  3. 3.

    In long-crested irregular sea, the sea elevation can be assumed statistically stable. See [26] for details and differences between long- and short-crested seas.

  4. 4.

    When designing observers for wave filtering in dynamic positioning, since the controller regulates the heading of the vessel, the designer can assign a new intensity to w b f; however, assigning the intensity of the noise in practice requires considerable expertise.

  5. 5.

    All the gains are optimally tuned for the observer designed using the model described in (17.1)–(17.7). Such a selection favors the old DP model; however, a comparison of the results of simulations shows that the observer designed using the newly proposed model yields better performance.

  6. 6.

    At this point, we should emphasize that the observers are designed according to the simple model of (17.10)–(17.15) [and (17.1)–(17.7)] while they are tested in the MCSim using a high fidelity model which captures hydrodynamic effects, generalized coriolis and centripetal accelerations, nonlinear damping and current forces, and generalized restoring forces. Moreover, in the MCSim the JONSWAP wave spectrum is used to simulate the waves while the observers are designed using a linear second order approximation of the spectrum.

  7. 7.

    Wave filtering in the robust DP controller is not implemented explicitly, see [15, 16] for details.

  8. 8.

    All the results are presented in full scale. During the testing phase care was taken to ensure that all controllers were tuned to their best performance, so as to allow for a fair comparative study.

  9. 9.

    For technical reasons in this experiment the tunnel thruster was deactivated.

  10. 10.

    Before a DP system is functional, the state estimate of the filter in the DP system should converge to its steady state performance; this initialization may take tens of minutes.

References

  1. Balchen J, Jenssen NA, Sælid S. Dynamic positioning using Kalman filtering and optimal control theory. In: The IFAC/IFIP symposium on automation in offshore oil field operation, Bergen, 1976. p. 183–6.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Balchen J, Jenssen NA, Sælid S. Dynamic positioning of floating vessels based on Kalman filtering and optimal control. In: Proceedings of the 19th IEEE conference on decision and control, New York, 1980. p. 852–64.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Balchen J, Jenssen NA, Sælid S. A dynamic positioning system based on Kalman filtering and optimal control. Modeling, Identification and Control. 1980;1(3):135–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Faltinsen OM. Sea loads on ships and offshore structures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fossen TI. Nonlinear passive control and observer design for ships. Modeling, Identification and Control. 2000;21(3):129–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Fossen TI. Handbook of marine craft hydrodynamics and motion control. Chichester: Wiley; 2011.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Fossen TI, Perez T. Kalman filtering for positioning and heading control of ships and offshore rigs. IEEE Control Syst Mag. 2009;29(6):32–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fossen TI, Perez T. Marine systems simulator (MSS). 2009. http://www.marinecontrol.org/.

  9. Fossen TI, Strand JP. Passive nonlinear observer design for ships using lyapunov methods: Full-scale experiments with a supply vessel. Automatica. 1999;35:3–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fossen TI, Sagatun SI, Sørensen AJ. Identification of dynamically positioned ships. J Control Eng Pract. 1996;4(3):369–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Grimble MJ, Patton RJ, Wise DA. The design of dynamic ship positioning control systems using stochastic optimal control theory. Optim Control Appl Methods. 1980;1:167–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Grimble MJ, Patton RJ, Wise DA. The design of dynamic ship positioning control systems using stochastic optimal control theory. IEE Proc. 1980;127(3):93–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Grøvlen Å, Fossen TI. Nonlinear control of dynamic positioned ships using only position feedback: An observer backstepping approach. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on decision and control (CDC’96), Kobe, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hassani V, Sørensen AJ, Pascoal AM. Evaluation of three dynamic ship positioning controllers: from calm to extreme conditions. In: Proceedings of the NGCUV’12 - IFAC workshop on navigation, guidance and control of underwater vehicles, Porto, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hassani V, Sørensen AJ, Pascoal AM. Robust dynamic positioning of offshore vessels using mixed-μ synthesis. Part I: Designing process. In: Proceedings of ACOOG’12 - IFAC workshop on automatic control in offshore oil and gas production, Trondheim, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hassani V, Sørensen AJ, Pascoal AM. Robust dynamic positioning of offshore vessels using mixed-μ synthesis. Part II: Simulation and experimental results. In: Proceedings of ACOOG’12 - IFAC workshop on automatic control in offshore oil and gas production, Trondheim, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hassani V, Sørensen AJ, Pascoal AM, Pedro Aguiar A. Multiple model adaptive wave filtering for dynamic positioning of marine vessels. In: Proceedings of ACC’12 - American control conference, Montreal, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hasselmann K, Barnett TP, Bouws E, Carlson H, Cartwright DE, Enke K, Ewing JA, Gienapp H, Hasselmann DE, Kruseman P, Meerburg A, Müller P, Olbers DJ, Richter K, Sell W, Walden H. Measurements of wind-wave growth and swell decay during the joint north sea wave project (JONSWAP). Ergnzungsheft zur Deutschen Hydrographischen Zeitschrift Reihe. 1973;8(12):1–95.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Loria A, Fossen TI, Panteley E. A separation principle for dynamic positioning of ships: theoretical and experimental results. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol. 2000;8(2):332–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. MARINTEK. Marine cybernetics laboratory. 2014. http://www.sintef.no/home/MARINTEK/Laboratories/Marine-Cybernetics-Laboratory/. Accessed 31 July 2014 [Online].

  21. Nguyen TD, Sørensen AJ, Quek ST. Design of hybrid controller for dynamic positioning from calm to extreme sea conditions. Automatica. 2007;43(5):768–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Perez T, Smogeli ØN, Fossen TI, Sørensen AJ. An overview of marine systems simulator (MSS): A simulink toolbox for marine control systems. In: Proceedings of Scandinavian conference on simulation and modeling (SIMS’05), Trondheim, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Perez T, Sørensen AJ, Blanke M. Marine vessel models in changing operational conditions – a tutorial. In: 14th IFAC symposium on system identification (SYSID’06), Newcastle, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Price WG, Bishop RED. Probabilistic theory of ship dynamics. London: Chapman and Hall; 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Sælid S, Jenssen NA, Balchen J. Design and analysis of a dynamic positioning system based on Kalman filtering and optimal control. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control. 1983;28(3):331–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Sørensen AJ. Lecture notes on marine control systems. Technical Report UK-11-76, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Sørensen AJ. A survey of dynamic positioning control systems. Annual Reviews in Control. 2011;35:123–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Sørensen AJ, Sagatun SI, Fossen TI. Design of a dynamic positioning system using model-based control. J Control Eng Pract. 1996;4(3):359–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Sørensen AJ, Pedersen E, Smogeli Ø. Simulation-based design and testing of dynamically positioned marine vessels. In: Proceedings of international conference on marine simulation and ship maneuverability (MARSIM’03), Kanazawa, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Strand JP. Nonlinear position control systems design for marine vessels. Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Eng. Cybernetics, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Strand JP, Fossen TI. Nonlinear passive observer for ships with adaptive wave filtering. In: Nijmeijer H, Fossen TI, editors. New directions in nonlinear observer design. London: Springer; 1999. p. 113–34.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  32. Torsetnes G, Jouffroy J, Fossen TI. Nonlinear dynamic positioning of ships with gain-scheduled wave filtering. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on decision and control (CDC’04), Paradise Iceland, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Triantafyllou MS. Cable mechanics for moored floating systems. In: Proceedings of 7th international conference on the behaviour of offshore structures at sea (BOSS’94), Cambridge, 1994. p. 57–77.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank our colleagues Asgeir J. Sørensen, A. Pedro Aguiar, N.T. Dong, and Thor I. Fossen for many discussions on wave filtering and adaptive estimation. We would also like to thank T. Wahl, M. Etemaddar, E. Peymani, M. Shapouri, and B. Ommani for their invaluable assistance during the model tests at MCLab. This work has been carried out at the Centre for Autonomous Marine Operations and Systems (AMOS) in collaboration with the Norwegian Marine Technology Research Institute (MARINTEK). The Norwegian Research Council is acknowledged as the main sponsor of AMOS. This work was supported by the Research Council of Norway through the Centres of Excellence funding scheme, Project number 223254—AMOS.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. Hassani .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hassani, V., Pascoal, A.M. (2015). Wave Filtering and Dynamic Positioning of Marine Vessels Using a Linear Design Model: Theory and Experiments. In: Ocampo-Martinez, C., Negenborn, R. (eds) Transport of Water versus Transport over Water. Operations Research/Computer Science Interfaces Series, vol 58. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16133-4_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics