Skip to main content

The Dynamics of the Rocking Frame

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Computational Methods in Applied Sciences ((COMPUTMETHODS,volume 37))

Abstract

This paper investigates the planar rocking response and stability analysis of an array of free-standing columns capped with a freely supported rigid beam. Part of the motivation for this study is the emerging seismic design concept of allowing framing systems to uplift and rock along their plane in order to limit bending moments and shear forces. Following a variational formulation the paper reaches the remarkable result that the dynamic rocking response of an array of free-standing columns capped with a rigid beam is identical to the rocking response of a single free-standing column with the same slenderness; yet with larger size—that is a more stable configuration. Most importantly, the study shows that the heavier the freely supported cap-beam is (epistyles with frieze atop), the more stable is the rocking frame, regardless of the rise of the center of gravity of the cap-beam; concluding that top-heavy rocking frames are more stable than when they are top-light. This “counter intuitive” finding renders rocking isolation a most attractive alternative for the seismic protection of bridges with tall piers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Acikgoz S, DeJong MJ (2012) The interaction of elasticity and rocking in flexible structures allowed to uplift. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 41(15):2177–2194

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alavi B, Krawinkler H (2001) Effects of near-source ground motions on frame-structures. Technical report No. 138, The John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Stanford University

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ambraseys N, Psycharis IN (2011) Earthquake stability of columns and statues. J Earthq Eng 15(5):685–710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Apostolou M, Gazetas G, Garini E (2007) Seismic response of slender rigid structures with foundation uplift. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 27:642–654

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Aslam M, Scalise DT, Godden WG (1980) Earthquake rocking response of rigid bodies. J Struct Div ASCE 106(2):377–392

    Google Scholar 

  6. Beck JL, Skinner RI (1974) The seismic response of a reinforced concrete bridge pier designed to step. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 2:343–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Buckle IG, Constantinou MC, Diclali M, Chasemi H (2006) Seismic isolation of highway bridges. Research report MCEER-06-SP07, MCEER, University of Buffalo, NY

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chen YH, Liao WH, Lee CL, Wang YP (2006) Seismic isolation of viaduct piers by means of a rocking mechanism. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 35(6):713–736

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cheng CT (2008) Shaking table tests of a self-centering designed bridge substructure. Eng Struct 30:3426–3433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cohagen L, Pang JBK, Stanton JF, Eberhard MO (2008) A precast concrete bridge bent designed to recenter after an earthquake. Research report, Federal Highway Administration

    Google Scholar 

  11. Constantinou MC, Soong TT, Dargush GF (1998) Passive energy dissipation systems for structural design and retrofit. In: Monograph series, MCEER, University of Buffalo, NY

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dimitrakopoulos EG, DeJong MJ (2012) Revisiting the rocking block: closed-form solutions and similarity laws. Proc Royal Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci 468(2144):2294–2318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hall JF, Heaton TH, Halling MW, Wald DJ (1995) Near-source ground motion and its effects on flexible buildings. Earthq Spectra 11(4):569–605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hogan, SJ (1989). On the dynamics of rigid-block motion under harmonic forcing. Proc Royal Soc Lond A425:441–476

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hogan SJ (1990) The many steady state responses of a rigid block under harmonic forcing. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 19(7):1057–1071

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Housner GW (1963) The behaviour of inverted pendulum structures during earthquakes. Bull Seismol Soc Am 53(2):404–417

    Google Scholar 

  17. Karavasilis TL, Makris N, Bazeos N, Beskos DE (2010) Dimensional response analysis of multistory regular steel MRF subjected to pulselike earthquake ground motions. J Struct Eng 136(8):921–932

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kirkpatrick P (1927) Seismic measurements by the overthrow of columns. Bull Seismol Soc Am 17(2):95–109

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Konstantinidis D, Makris N (2005) Seismic response analysis of multidrum classical columns. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 34(10):1243–1270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Loh CH, Lee ZK, Wu TC, Peng SY (2000) Ground motion characteristics of the Chi-Chi earthquake of 21 September 1999. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 29:867–897

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Makris N (1997) Rigidity–plasticity–viscosity: can electrorheological dampers protect base-isolated structures from near-source ground motions? Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 26:571–591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Makris N (2014) The role of rotational inertia on the seismic resistance of free-standing rocking columns and articulated frames. Bull Seismol Soc Am 104(5):22226–22239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Makris N, Chang SP (2000) Effect of viscous, viscoplastic and friction damping on the response of seismic isolated structures. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 29(1):85–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Makris N, Roussos Y (2000) Rocking response of rigid blocks under near-source ground motions. Geotechnique 50(3):243–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Makris N, Zhang J (2004) Seismic response analysis of highway overcrossings equipped with elastomeric bearings and fluid dampers. J Struct Eng ASCE 130(6):830–845

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Makris N, Konstantinidis D (2003) The rocking spectrum and the limitations of practical design methodologies. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 32:265–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Makris N, Black CJ (2004) Dimensional analysis of rigid-plastic and elastoplastic structures under pulse-type excitations. J Eng Mech (ASCE) 130(9):1006–1018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Makris N, Black CJ (2004) Dimensional analysis of bilinear oscillators under pulse-type excitations. J Eng Mech (ASCE) 130(9):1019–1031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Makris N, Psychogios C (2006) Dimensional response analysis of yielding structures with first-mode dominated response. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 35:1203–1224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Makris N, Vassiliou MF (2012) Sizing the slenderness of free-standing rocking columns to withstand earthquake shaking. Arch Appl Mech 82(10–11):1497–1511

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Makris N, MF Vassiliou (2013) Planar rocking response and stability analysis of an array of free-standing columns capped with a freely supported rigid beam. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 42(3):431–444

    Google Scholar 

  32. Makris N, Vassiliou MF (2014) Are some top-heavy structures more stable? J Struct Eng 140(5)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Mavroeidis GP, Papageorgiou AS (2003) A mathematical representation of near-fault ground motions. Bull Seism Soc Am 93(3):1099–1131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Milne J (1885) Seismic experiments. Trans Seism Soc Jpn 8:1–82

    Google Scholar 

  35. Palmeri A, Makris N (2008) Response analysis of rigid structures rocking on viscoelastic foundation. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 37:1039–1063

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Palmeri A, Makris N (2008) Linearization and first-order expansion of the rocking motion of rigid blocks stepping on viscoelastic foundation. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 37:1065–1080

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Papaloizou L, Komodromos K (2009) Planar investigation of the seismic response of ancient columns and colonnades with epistyles using a custom-made software. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 29(11–12):1437–1454

    Google Scholar 

  38. Pecker A (2005) Design and construction of the foundations of the Rion Antirion Bridge. In Proceedings of the 1st Greece–Japan workshop on seismic design, observation, retrofit of foundations, Athens (pp 119–130)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Psycharis IN, Jennings PC (1983) Rocking of slender rigid bodies allowed to uplift. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 11:57–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Prieto F, Lourenço PB, Oliveira CS (2004) Impulsive Dirac-delta forces in the rocking motion. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 33:839–857

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Ricker N (1943) Further developments in the wavelet theory of seismogram structure. Bull Seismol Soc Am 33:197–228

    Google Scholar 

  42. Ricker N (1944) Wavelet functions and their polynomials. Geophysics 9:314–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Pang JBK, Stenk KP, Cohagen L, Stanton JF, Eberhard MO (2008) Rapidly constructible large-bar precast bridge-bent seismic connection. In: Research Report WA-RD684.2, Washington State Department of Transportation

    Google Scholar 

  44. Roh H, Reinhorn A (2010) Nonlinear static analysis of structures with rocking columns. J Struct Eng ASCE 136(5):532–542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Roh H, Reinhorn A (2010) Modeling and seismic response of structures with concrete rocking columns and viscous dampers. Eng Struct 32:2096–2107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Sakai J, Hyungil J, Mahin S (2006) Reinforced concrete bridge columns that re-center following earthquakes. In: Proceedings of the 8th US National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, April 18–22, San Francisco, California

    Google Scholar 

  47. Skinner RI, Beck JL, Bycroft GN (1974) A practical system for isolating structures from earthquake attack. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 3(3):297–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Sharpe RD, Skinner RI (1983) The seismic design of an industrial chimney with rocking base. Bulletin, New Zealand

    Google Scholar 

  49. Spanos, PD, Koh AS (1984) Rocking of rigid blocks due to harmonic shaking. J Eng Mech ASCE 110(11):1627–1642

    Google Scholar 

  50. Truniger R, Vassiliou MF, Stojadinovic B. (2014) Experimental study on the interaction between elasticity and rocking. In: Proceedings of the 10th national conference in earthquake engineering, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Anchorage, AK

    Google Scholar 

  51. Vassiliou M, Makris N (2009) Evaluation of the coherence of strong ground motions using wavelet analysis. In: ACES workshop: advances in performance-based earthquake engineering, Corfu, Greece, July 4–7

    Google Scholar 

  52. Vassiliou MF, Makris N (2011) Estimating time scales and length scales in pulselike earthquake acceleration records with wavelet analysis. Bull Seismol Soc Am 101(2):596–618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Vassiliou MF, Makris N (2012) Analysis of the rocking response of rigid blocks standing free on a seismically isolated base. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 41(2):177–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Vassiliou MF, Mackie KR, Stojadinović B (2014) Dynamic response analysis of solitary flexible rocking bodies: modeling and behavior under pulse‐like ground excitation. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 43:1463–1481

    Google Scholar 

  55. Veletsos AS, Newmark NM, Chelepati CV (1965) Deformation spectra for elastic and elastoplastic systems subjected to ground shock and earthquake motions. In: Proceedings of the 3rd world conference on earthquake engineering, vol II. Wellington, New Zealand, pp 663–682

    Google Scholar 

  56. Wacker JM, Hieber DG, Stanton JF, Eberhard MO (2005) Design of precast concrete piers for rapid bridge construction in seismic regions. Research Report, Federal Highway Administration

    Google Scholar 

  57. Yim CS, Chopra AK, Penzien J (1980) Rocking response of rigid blocks to earthquakes. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 8(6):565–587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Zhang J, Makris N (2001) Rocking response of free-standing blocks under cycloidal pulses. J Eng Mech ASCE 127(5):473–483

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Financial support for this study has been provided by the research project “Seismio Rock Bridge” which is implemented under the “ARISTEIA” action of the “OPERATIONAL PROGRAMME EDUCATION AND LIFELONG LEARNING” and is co-funded by the European Union (European Social Fund) and Greek National Resources.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicos Makris .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Makris, N., Vassiliou, M.F. (2015). The Dynamics of the Rocking Frame. In: Psycharis, I., Pantazopoulou, S., Papadrakakis, M. (eds) Seismic Assessment, Behavior and Retrofit of Heritage Buildings and Monuments. Computational Methods in Applied Sciences, vol 37. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16130-3_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16130-3_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-16129-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-16130-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics