Abstract
Organizational network modeling can exhibit complexity in many forms to embrace the reality of an organization’s processes and capabilities. Networks enable modelers to account for many structural and attributional elements of organizations in ways that can be more powerful than statistical data mining methods or stochastic models. However, the price paid for this increased modeling strength can come in the form of increased complexity, sensitivity and fragility. Traditional network methods and measures can be sensitive to changing, unknown, or inaccurate topology; fragile to dynamic and algorithmic processing; and computationally stressed when incorporating high-dimensional data. Sensitivity and fragility of network models can be managed by setting boundaries around network states, within which specific geometries and topologies can be robustly measured. We propose a categorical framework that identifies such boundaries and develops appropriate modeling methodology and measuring tools for various categories of organizational networks. Categorization of networks along important dimensions such as type, size, layers, dynamics and dimensions provide boundaries of paradigm shifts (from a social scientific perspective) or phase transitions (from physical sciences) – points at which the fundamental properties or dynamics of the networks change. Not adjusting for these categorical issues can lead to poor methodology, flawed analysis, and deficient results. The purpose of our work is to: 1) develop a framework to enable the construction of a network organizational modeling theory, and 2) identify measures, methods and tools that are appropriate for specific categories (and inappropriate for others) within this field of study. We believe that such a framework can help guide underlying theory and serve as a basis for further formalization of network studies.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Barabasi, A.L., Albert, R.: Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science 286, 509–512 (1999)
Barabasi, A.L.: Scale-free networks: a decade and beyond. Science 325, 412–413 (2009)
Bell, J.: Subgroup Centrality Measures. Network Science 2(2), 277–297 (2014)
Borgatti, S.P., Everett, M.G.: Models of core / periphery structures. Social Networks 21, 375–395 (1999)
Borgatti, S.P., Mehra, A., Brass, D., Labianca, G.: Network analysis in the social sciences. Science 323, 892–895 (2009)
Borgatti, S., Carley, K., Krackhardt, D.: On the Robustness of Centrality Measures under Conditions of Imperfect Data. Social Networks 28, 124–136 (2006)
Brandes, U., Robins, G., McCranie, A., Wasserman, S.: What is network Science? Network Science 1, 1–15 (2013)
Carley, K.M.: Dynamics Network Analysis. In: Breiger, R., Carley, K., Pattison, P. (eds.) Dynamic Social Network Modelling and Analysis: Workshop Summary and Papers, pp. 133–145. National Research Council (2003)
Kivela, M., Arenas, A., Barthelemy, M., Gleeson, J., Moreno, Y., Porter, M.: Multilayer Networks. J. Complex Netw. 2(3), 203–271 (2014); arXiv preprint arXiv:1309.7233 (2013)
Salas, E., Cooke, N.J., Rosen, M.A.: On Teams, Teamwork, and Team Performance: Discoveries and Developments. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 50(3), 540–547 (2008)
Silver, N.: The Signal and the Noise: The art and science of prediction. Penguin Books (2012)
Schwann, T., Schleyden, M.J.: Microscopical researches into the accordance in the structure and growth of animals and plants. Printed for the Sydenham Society, London (1847)
Stokols, D., Hall, K.L., Taylor, B.K., Moser, R.P.: The Science of Team Science: Overview of the Field and Introduction to the Supplement. Am. J. Prev. Med. 35(2S), S77–S89 (2008)
Taleb, N.: Antifragile: Things that gain from disorder. Random House (2012)
West, B.: Complex Webs (2011)
Xu, J., Chen, H.: The topology of Dark Networks. Communications of the ACM 51(10), 58–65 (2008)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Arney, C., Coronges, K. (2015). Categorical Framework for Complex Organizational Networks: Understanding the Effects of Types, Size, Layers, Dynamics and Dimensions. In: Mangioni, G., Simini, F., Uzzo, S., Wang, D. (eds) Complex Networks VI. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 597. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16112-9_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16112-9_19
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-16111-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-16112-9
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)