Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Role of Gender Concerns in the Planning of Small-Scale Energy Projects in Developing Countries

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Decentralized Solutions for Developing Economies

Part of the book series: Springer Proceedings in Energy ((SPE))

  • 1260 Accesses

Abstract

Energy poverty affects women in developing countries more severely than it affects men; at the same time, women have less control over household resources and are often not involved in decision-making processes on energy matters. In order for transition processes of energy systems to be sustainable, these gender-related concerns need to be addressed. Although this link is widely recognized, gender aspects are still not well perceived in the planning of energy projects. To better understand the role of gender concerns in project planning, the research presented in this paper evaluates concepts of small-scale sustainable energy projects with regard to their gender sensitivity. The data originates from an expert evaluation process and was analyzed with focus on gender-related aspects. The results show that even in sustainable energy projects the issue is still not high on the agenda.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    “WISIONS of sustainability” is an initiative by the Wuppertal Institute supported by the Swiss-based foundation ProEvolution. It was launched in 2004 to promote practical and sustainable energy projects. To ensure the sustainable character of the projects supported by the SEPS scheme their selection is based on the following set of criteria: technical viability, economic feasibility, local and global environmental benefits, replicability and marketability, potential for poverty reduction, social equity and gender issues, local involvement and employment, potential, sound implementation strategy and dissemination concept. For more detailed information on the program, please visit the website www.wisions.net.

References

  • Action, P. (2012). Poor people’s energy outlook 2012. UK: Warwickshire.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Alston, M. (2014). Gender mainstreaming and climate change. Women’s Studies International Forum. Vol. 47, Part B, pp. 287–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cecelski, E. (2000). The role of women in sustainable energy development. Colorado: National Renewable Energy Laboratory Golden.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cecelski, E. (2004). Re-thinking gender and energy: Old and new directions. ENERGIA/EASE Discussion Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clancy, J. (2009). Late developers: Gender mainstreaming in the energy sector. http://www.devstud.org.uk/aqadmin/media/uploads/4ab8efeb3f827_SA3-clancy-dsa09.pdf. Accessed 10 Jan 2014.

  • Clancy, J., Winther, T., Matinga, M., & Oparaocha, S. (2012). Gender equity in access to and benefits from modern energy and improved energy technologies. In World Development Report: Gender Equality and Development. World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dienst, C., König, J., Ortiz, W., & Terrapon-Pfaff, J. (2013). Small is beautiful!? Evaluating the sustainability of small-scale renewable energy projects in developing countries. In M. Schäfer, N. Kebir, & D. Philipp (Eds.), Micro perspectives for decentralized energy supply. Proceedings of the international conference, Berlin, 27 Feb–1 Mar 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutta, S. (2003). Mainstreaming gender in energy planning and policies, UNESCAP project on capacity building on integration of energy and rural development planning. Background paper for expert group meeting, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geels, F. W. (2011). The multi-level perspective on sustainability transitions: Responses to seven criticisms. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 1, 24–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International energy agency (IEA)/Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2012). World energy outlook 2012: WEO2012 measuring progress towards energy for all. Paris: International Energy Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambrou, Y., & Piana, G. (2006). Energy and gender in rural sustainable development. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malhotra, P. R., Neudoerffer, C. & Dutta, S. (2004). A participatory process for designing cooking energy programmes with women. Biomass and Bioenergy, 26, 147–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • ​​Misana, S., & Karlsson, G. (2001). Generating opportunities: Case studies on energy and women. New York: United Nations Development Programme.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oparaocha, S., & Dutta, S. (2011). Gender and energy for sustainable development. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2011(3), 265–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pachauri, S., & Rao, N. D. (2013). Gender impacts and determinants of energy poverty: Are we asking the right questions? Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 5, 205–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parikh, J. (2011). Hardships and health impacts on women due to traditional cooking fuels: A case study of Himachal Pradesh, India. Energy Policy, 39(2011), 7587–7594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reddy, B., & Nathan, H. (2013). Energy in the development strategy of Indian households—the missing half. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 18(2013), 203–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shailaja, R. (2000). Women, energy and sustainable development. Energy for Sustainable Development, Energy for Sustainable Development, 4(1), 45–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skutsch, M. M. (1998). The gender issue in energy project planning. Welfare, empowerment or efficiency? Energy Policy, 26(12), 945–955.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skutsch, M. M. (2001). Why special attention to gender in electrification programmes? www.energia.org/pubs/papers/skutsch_electrification.pdf. Accessed 10 Jan 2014.

  • Skutsch, M. M. (2005). Gender analysis for energy projects and programmes. Energy for Sustainable Development, 9(1), 37–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). (2011). Towards an “energy plus” approach for the poor. A review of good practices and lessons learned from Asia and the Pacific. UNDP, Bangkok.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wickramasinghe, A. (2003). Gender and health issues in the biomass energy cycle: impediments to sustainable development. Energy for Sustainable Development, 7(3), 51–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2008). The welfare impact of rural electrification: A reassessment of the costs and benefits. An IEG impact evaluation. Washington: The World Bank.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy GmbH, P.O. Box 100480, 42004, Wuppertal, Germany

    Julia Terrapon-Pfaff, Carmen Dienst & Willington Ortiz

Authors
  1. Julia Terrapon-Pfaff
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Carmen Dienst
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Willington Ortiz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julia Terrapon-Pfaff .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. ZTG Sekr. HBS1, Technische Universität Berlin Microenergy Systems Research Group, Berlin, Germany

    Sebastian Groh

  2. ZTG Sekr. HBS1, Technische Universität Berlin Microenergy Systems Research Group, Berlin, Germany

    Jonas van der Straeten

  3. ZTG Sekr. HBS1, Technische Universität Berlin Microenergy Systems Research Group, Berlin, Germany

    Brian Edlefsen Lasch

  4. University of California Berkeley Rural Energy Group, Berkeley, California, USA

    Dimitry Gershenson

  5. Faculty of Life Sciences, Hamburg University of Applied Science, Hamburg, Germany

    Walter Leal Filho

  6. Class of 135 Distinguished, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, California, USA

    Daniel M. Kammen

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Terrapon-Pfaff, J., Dienst, C., Ortiz, W. (2015). The Role of Gender Concerns in the Planning of Small-Scale Energy Projects in Developing Countries. In: Groh, S., van der Straeten, J., Edlefsen Lasch, B., Gershenson, D., Leal Filho, W., Kammen, D. (eds) Decentralized Solutions for Developing Economies. Springer Proceedings in Energy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15964-5_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15964-5_25

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-15963-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-15964-5

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation