Abstract
This concluding chapter begins by wondering what is the more likely societal answer to the Anthropocene, as the human experiment with the planet continues. Although the theoretical alternatives-either stopping or radicalizing the experiment-seem clear, most probably none of them will be fully adopted. Instead, as it is the case with climate change, collective action will be indecisive and partial, while the odds of society advancing towards de-growth or self-limitation looking rather weak. For that reason, environmentalism itself should reinvent itself, shifting towards a more modernization-friendly agenda that incorporates a more enticing narrative about the socionatural relation of the future. A case for a rejuvenated environmentalism is thus offered. Finally, a proper conclusion attempts to summarize the main arguments that the book has presented.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Anderson, J. (2010). From ‘zombies’ to ‘coyotes’: Environmentalism where we are. Environmental Politics, 19(6), 973–991.
Blumenberg, H. (2009). Geistesgechichte der Technik. Berlin: Suhrkamp.
Dennis, K., & Urry, J. (2009). After the car. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Escobar, A. (1999). After nature: Steps to an antiessentialist political ecology. Current Anthropology, 40(1), 1–30.
Frankel, B. (1987). The post industrial Utopians. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Gardiner, S. (2006). A perfect moral storm: Climate change, intergenerational ethics and the problem of moral corruption. Environmental Values, 15, 397–413.
Humphrey, M. (ed.). (2003). Political theory and and the environment: A reassessment. Londres: Frank Cass.
Karlsson, R. (2015). Green political theory in a climate changed world. Environmental politics (forthcoming).
Kersten, J. (2013). The Enjoyment of Complexity: A New Political Anthropology for the Anthropocene. In H. Trischler (Ed.), Anthropocene. Envisioning the Future of the Age of Humans (pp. 39–56). Rachel Carson Center Perspectives, 2013/3.
Klein, N. (2014). This changes everything: Capitalism vs. the climate, New York: Simon & Schuster.
Kolbert, E. (2014). Can climate change cure capitalism? New York Review of Books, LXI(19), 14–16.
Kolbert, E. (2015). Can climate change cure capitalism? an exchange with Naomi Klein. New York Review of Books, LXII(1), 60.
Latour, B. (2011). Love your monsters. In M. Shellenberg & T. Nordhaus (Eds.), Love your monsters. Postenvironmentalism and the Anthropocene (pp. 16–23). San Francisco: The Breakthrough Institute.
Nordhaus, T., & Shellenberg, M. (2011). Introduction. In M. Shellenberg & T. Nordhaus (Eds.), Love your monsters. Postenvironmentalism and the Anthropocene (pp. 5–7). San Francisco: The Breakthrough Institute.
Schneider-Mayerson, M. (2013). From politics to prophecy: Environmental quiescence and the ‘peak-oil’ movement. Environmental Politics, 22(5), 866–882.
Tickell, C. (2011). Societal responses to the Anthropocene. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 369, 926–932.
Urry, J. (2008). Climate change, travel and complex futures. British Journal of Sociology, 59(2), 261–279.
Welzer, H. (2008). Klimakriege. Wofür im 21. Jahrhundert getötet wird. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer Verlag.
White, D. & Wilbert, C. (2009). Inhabiting technonatural time/spaces. In D. White & C. Wilbert (Eds.), Technonatures. Environments, technologies, spaces, and places in the twenty-first century (pp. 1–30). Waterloo: Wilfried Laurie University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Arias-Maldonado, M. (2015). The Future of Nature. In: Environment and Society. SpringerBriefs in Political Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15952-2_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15952-2_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-15951-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-15952-2
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)