Skip to main content

The Future of Nature

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Environment and Society

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Political Science ((BRIEFSPOLITICAL))

  • 1528 Accesses

Abstract

This concluding chapter begins by wondering what is the more likely societal answer to the Anthropocene, as the human experiment with the planet continues. Although the theoretical alternatives-either stopping or radicalizing the experiment-seem clear, most probably none of them will be fully adopted. Instead, as it is the case with climate change, collective action will be indecisive and partial, while the odds of society advancing towards de-growth or self-limitation looking rather weak. For that reason, environmentalism itself should reinvent itself, shifting towards a more modernization-friendly agenda that incorporates a more enticing narrative about the socionatural relation of the future. A case for a rejuvenated environmentalism is thus offered. Finally, a proper conclusion attempts to summarize the main arguments that the book has presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anderson, J. (2010). From ‘zombies’ to ‘coyotes’: Environmentalism where we are. Environmental Politics, 19(6), 973–991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blumenberg, H. (2009). Geistesgechichte der Technik. Berlin: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennis, K., & Urry, J. (2009). After the car. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Escobar, A. (1999). After nature: Steps to an antiessentialist political ecology. Current Anthropology, 40(1), 1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frankel, B. (1987). The post industrial Utopians. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardiner, S. (2006). A perfect moral storm: Climate change, intergenerational ethics and the problem of moral corruption. Environmental Values, 15, 397–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey, M. (ed.). (2003). Political theory and and the environment: A reassessment. Londres: Frank Cass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karlsson, R. (2015). Green political theory in a climate changed world. Environmental politics (forthcoming).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kersten, J. (2013). The Enjoyment of Complexity: A New Political Anthropology for the Anthropocene. In H. Trischler (Ed.), Anthropocene. Envisioning the Future of the Age of Humans (pp. 39–56). Rachel Carson Center Perspectives, 2013/3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, N. (2014). This changes everything: Capitalism vs. the climate, New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolbert, E. (2014). Can climate change cure capitalism? New York Review of Books, LXI(19), 14–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolbert, E. (2015). Can climate change cure capitalism? an exchange with Naomi Klein. New York Review of Books, LXII(1), 60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (2011). Love your monsters. In M. Shellenberg & T. Nordhaus (Eds.), Love your monsters. Postenvironmentalism and the Anthropocene (pp. 16–23). San Francisco: The Breakthrough Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordhaus, T., & Shellenberg, M. (2011). Introduction. In M. Shellenberg & T. Nordhaus (Eds.), Love your monsters. Postenvironmentalism and the Anthropocene (pp. 5–7). San Francisco: The Breakthrough Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider-Mayerson, M. (2013). From politics to prophecy: Environmental quiescence and the ‘peak-oil’ movement. Environmental Politics, 22(5), 866–882.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tickell, C. (2011). Societal responses to the Anthropocene. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 369, 926–932.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urry, J. (2008). Climate change, travel and complex futures. British Journal of Sociology, 59(2), 261–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welzer, H. (2008). Klimakriege. Wofür im 21. Jahrhundert getötet wird. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, D. & Wilbert, C. (2009). Inhabiting technonatural time/spaces. In D. White & C. Wilbert (Eds.), Technonatures. Environments, technologies, spaces, and places in the twenty-first century (pp. 1–30). Waterloo: Wilfried Laurie University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manuel Arias-Maldonado .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Arias-Maldonado, M. (2015). The Future of Nature. In: Environment and Society. SpringerBriefs in Political Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15952-2_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics