Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Preoperative Testing: Ethical Challenges, Evidence-Based Medicine and Informed Consent

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Ethical Issues in Anesthesiology and Surgery

  • 849 Accesses

Abstract

Preoperative medical testing for anesthesia and surgery presents certain ethical challenges. Medical evidence suggests that most preoperative testing is unnecessary and may actually harm patients, violating the ethical principle of nonmaleficence. When preoperative testing is done, the anticipated true benefits and possible harms should be disclosed to the patient, as with any medical decision. Certain tests, such as pregnancy and HIV (human immunodeficiency virus) testing require particular care in the informed consent process, because they may be affected by the explicit legal rights of the patient. When patients refuse preoperative testing, the physician should generally respect the patient’s decisions unless it would lead to care that is bizarre, futile, or below published professional standards.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bryson GL, Wyand A, Bragg PR. Preoperative testing is inconsistent with published guidelines and rarely changes management. Can J Anaesth. 2006;53:236–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Carrier ER, Resschovsky JD, Katz DA, Mello MM. High physician concern about malpractice risk predicts more aggressive diagnostic testing in office-based practice. Health Aff (Millwood). 2013;32:1383–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. DeKay ML, Asch DA. Is the defensive use of diagnostic tests good for patients, or bad? Med Decis Making. 1998;18:19–28.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kumar A, Srivastava U. Role of routine laboratory investigations in preoperative evaluation. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2011;27:174–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Kalantri SP. Ethics, evidence and anaesthesiology. Ind J Anaesth. 2004;48:108–10.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Polaris JJ, Katz JN. “Appropriate” diagnostic testing: supporting diagnostics with evidence-based medicine and shared decision-making. BMC Res Notes. 2014;7:922.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Burger IM, Kass NE. Screening in the dark: ethical considerations of providing screening tests to individuals when evidence is insufficient to support screening populations. Am J Bioeth. 2009;9:3–14.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Alderson P, Bunn F, Lefebvre C, Li WP, Li L, Roberts I, et al. Human albumin solution for resuscitation and volume expansion in critically ill patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;18:CD001208.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gotzsche PC, Nielsen M. Screening for breast cancer with mammography. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;1:CD001877.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ubel PA, Asch DA. Creating value in health by understanding and overcoming resistance to de-innovation. Health Aff (Millwood). 2015;34:239–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hoffmann TC, Del Mar C. Patients’ expectations of the benefits and harms of treatments, screening and tests: a systematic review. JAMA Intern Med. 2015;175:274–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gaspoz JM. Smarter medicine: do physicians need political pressure to eliminate useless interventions? Swiss Med Wkly. 2015;145:w13125.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Onuoha OC, Arkoosh VA, Fleisher LA. Choosing wisely in anesthesiology: the gap between evidence and practice. JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174:13991–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Nash GF, Cunnick GH, Allen S, Cook C, Turner LF. Preoperative electrocardiograph examination. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2001;83(6):381–2.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Atkins RF, Roizen MF. Predicting the utility of the preoperative electrocardiogram: ageism and its economic impact. J Clin Monit. 1994;10:70–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Noordzij PG, Boersma E, Bax JJ, Feringa HH, Schreiner F, Schouten O, et al. Prognostic value of routine preoperative electrocardiography in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. Am J Cardiol. 2006;97:1103–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Fleisher LA. The preoperative electrocardiogram: what is the role in 2007? Ann Surg. 2007;246:171–2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Munro J, Booth A, Nicholl J. Routine preoperative testing: a systematic review of the evidence. Health Technol Assess. 1997;1:i–iv,1–62.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Correll DJ, Hepner DL, Chang C, Tsen L, Hevelone ND, Bader AM. Preoperative electrocardiograms: patient factors predictive of abnormalities. Anesthesiology. 2009;110:1205–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Liu LL, Dzankic S, Leung JM. Preoperative electrocardiogram abnormalities do not predict postoperative cardiac complications in geriatric surgical patients. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2002;50:1186–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Tait AR, Parr HG, Tremper KK. Evaluation of the efficacy of routine preoperative electrocardiograms. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 1997;11:752–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Fleisher LA, Beckman JA, Brown KA, et al. ACC/AHA 2007 guidelines on perioperative cardiovascular evaluation and care for noncardiac surgery. Anesth Analg. 2007;104:15–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Preanesthesia Evaluation. Practice advisory for preanesthesia evaluation: a report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Preanesthesia Evaluation. Anesthesiology. 2002;96:485–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. de Sousa S, Brandao RR, Mourao MR, Azevedo VL, Figueiredo AV, Trindade ES. Relevance of routine testing in low-risk patients undergoing minor and medium surgical procedures. Braz J Anestesiol. 2013;63:197–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Czoski-Murray C, Lloyd Jones M, McCabe C, Claxton K, Oluboyede Y, Roberts J, et al. What is the value of routinely testing full blood count, electrolytes and urea, and pulmonary function tests before elective surgery in patients with no apparent clinical indication and in subgroups of patients with common comorbidities: a systematic review of the clinical and cost-effective literature. Health Technol Assess. 2012;16:i–xvi, 1–159.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hirsch IA, Tomlinson DL, Slogoff S, Keats AS. The overstated risk of preoperative hypokalemia. Anesth Analg. 1988;67:131–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Wong KC, Sperry R. What is an acceptable preoperative serum potassium level for surgery? Anesthesiology. 1994;81:269.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Fritsch G, Flamm M, Hepner DL, Panisch S, Seer J, Soennichsen A. Abnormal pre-operative tests, pathological findings of medical history, and their predictive value for perioperative complications. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2012;56:339–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Johnson RK, Mortimer AJ. Routine pre-operative blood testing: is it necessary? Anaesthesia. 2002;57:914–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kaplan EB, Sheiner LB, Boeckmann AJ, Roizen MF, Beal SL, Cohen SN, et al. The usefulness of preoperative laboratory screening. JAMA. 1985;253:3576–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Dützmann S, Gessler F, Marquardt G, Seifert V, Senft C. On the value of routine prothrombin time screening in elective neurosurgical procedures. Neurosurg Focus. 2012;33:E9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Townsend JC, Heard R, Powers ER, Rueben A. Usefulness of international normalized ratio to predict bleeding complications in patients with end-stage liver disease who undergo cardiac catheterization. Am J Cardiol. 2012;110(7):1062–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Seicean A, Schiltz NK, Seicean S, Alan N, Neuhauser D, Weil RJ. Use and utility of preoperative hemostatic screening and patient history in adult neurosurgical patients. J Neurosurg. 2012;116(5):1097–105.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Samkova A, Blatny J, Fiamoli V, Dulicek P, Parizkova E. Significance and causes of abnormal preoperative coagulation test results in children. Haemophilia. 2012;18:e297–301.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. van Veen JJ, Spahn DR, Makris M. Routine preoperative coagulation tests: an outdated practice? Br J Anaesth. 2011;106:1–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Eckman MH, Erban JK, Singh SK, Kao GS. Screening for the risk for bleeding or thrombosis. Ann Intern Med. 2003;138:W15–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Chee YL, Crawford JC, Watson HG, Greaves M. BJH guidelines on the assessment of bleeding risk prior to surgery or invasive procedures. British Committee for Standards in Haematology. Br J Haematol. 2007;140:496–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Chng WJ, Sum C, Kuperan P. Causes of isolated prolonged activated partial thromboplastin time in an acute care general hospital. Singapore Med J. 2005;46(9):450–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Weber P, Eberle J, Bogner JR, Schrimpf F, Jansson V, Huber-Wagner S. Is there benefit to routine screening of infectivity for HIV, hepatitis B and C virus before elective orthopedic operations? Infection. 2013;41(2):479–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Wiegand J, Kaiser T, Lobstein S. Low prevalence of chronic hepatitis C, but high prevalence of elevated transaminases in a cohort of 2026 patients referred for orthopedic surgery in the eastern part of Germany. Z Gastroenterol. 2006;44:11–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Lobstein S, Kaiser T, Liebert U, Wojan M, Leichtle A, Mossner J, et al. Prevalence, aetiology and associated co-morbidities of elevated aminotransferases in a German cohort of orthopedic surgery patients. Z Gastroenterol. 2008;46:415–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. LaPorte DM, Mont MA, Jones LC, Padden DA, Hungerford DS. Human immunodeficiency virus testing for elective orthopedic procedures: results in a community-based hospital. Orthopedics. 2001;24(1):52–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Lester P, Partridge JC, Cheesny MA, Cooke M. The consequences of a positive prenatal HIV antibody test for women. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Hum Retrovirol. 1995;10:341–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Henshaw SK, Kost K. Parental involvement in minors’ abortion decisions. Fam Plann Perspect. 1992;24:196–207.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Williams PM, Fletcher S. Health effects of prenatal radiation exposure. Am Fam Physician. 2010;82:488–93.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Gaymer CE, Achten J, Auckett R, Cooper L, Griffin D. Fluoroscopic radiation exposure during hip arthroscopy. Arthroscopy. 2013;29:870–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Juhasz-Boss I, Solomayer E, Strik M, Raspe C. Abdominal surgery in pregnancy–an interdisciplinary challenge. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2014;111:465–72.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Brodsky JB. Anesthesia and surgery during early pregnancy and fetal outcome. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1983;26:449–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Mazze RI, Kallen B. Reproductive outcome after anesthesia and operation during pregnancy: a registry study of 5405 cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989;161:1178–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Mazze RI, Kallen B. Appendectomy during pregnancy: a Swedish registry study of 778 cases. Obstet Gynecol. 1991;77:835–40.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Kempen PM. Preoperative pregnancy testing: a survey of current practice. J Clin Anesth. 1997;9:546–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Department of Biomedical Ethics, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific Street, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA

    Gail A. Van Norman MD

Authors
  1. Gail A. Van Norman MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gail A. Van Norman MD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Anesthesiology, The University of Illinois Hospital and Health Sciences System, Chicago, Illinois, USA

    Barbara G. Jericho

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Van Norman, G.A. (2015). Preoperative Testing: Ethical Challenges, Evidence-Based Medicine and Informed Consent. In: Jericho, B. (eds) Ethical Issues in Anesthesiology and Surgery. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15949-2_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15949-2_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-15948-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-15949-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation