Advertisement

Futility and the Care of the Perioperative Patient

  • Scott B. Grant
  • Parth K. Modi
  • Eric A. SingerEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Futility in healthcare is an area of significant debate. Generally, a futile treatment is one that is incapable of producing a beneficial result. The degree of benefit required has been contentious in the ethics literature. Different definitions of futility have been proposed to arrive at a consensus regarding which treatments would be provided and to agree on futile interventions that could be withheld. However, each of these definitions has flaws. Some hospitals, healthcare organizations, and states have implemented policies to create a procedural approach to futility disputes. Several authors have advocated discarding the language of futility as it often is an expression of physician frustration and impedes communication between care providers, patients and their surrogates. Many resources are available to assist in difficult cases involving futility including preoperative risk calculators and institutional ethics committees, but, ultimately, the best tool in approaching these challenging situations is open and honest communication between the patient, or surrogate, and the physician.

Keywords

Futility End-of-Life Care Inappropriate Treatment Surgery Anesthesiology Perioperative 

References

  1. 1.
    Powledge TM, Steinfels P. Following the news on Karen Quinlan. Hastings Cent Rep. 1975;5(6):5–6. 28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Branson R, Casebeer K. Obscuring the role of the physician. Hastings Cent Rep. 1976;6(1):8–11.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Annas GJ. In re Quinlan: legal comfort for doctors. Hastings Cent Rep. 1976;6(3):29–31.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Annas GJ. When procedures limit rights: from Quinlan to Conroy. Hastings Cent Rep. 1985;15(2):24–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Annas GJ. Nonfeeding: lawful killing in CA, homicide in NJ. Hastings Cent Rep. 1983;13(6):19–20.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Capron AM. Ironies and tensions in feeding the dying. Hastings Cent Rep. 1984;14(5):32–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wolf SM. Nancy Beth Cruzan: in no voice at all. Hastings Cent Rep. 1990;20(1):38–41.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Orentlicher D. From the office of the general counsel. The right to die after Cruzan. JAMA. 1990;264(18):2444–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gostin LO. From Quinlan to Cruzan, Glucksberg, and Vacco- a brief history and analysis of constitutional protection of the ‘right to die’. JAMA. 1997;278(18):1523–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Angell M. The case of Helga Wanglie. A new kind of “right to die” case. N Engl J Med. 1991;325(7):511–2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Miles SH. Informed demand for “non-beneficial” medical treatment. N Engl J Med. 1991;325(7):512–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Annas GJ. Asking the courts to set the standard of emergency care – the case of Baby K. N Engl J Med. 1994;330(21):1542–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rutter TL. US doctors win life support lawsuit. BMJ. 1995;310(6989):1223–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Capron AM. Abandoning a waning life. Hastings Cent Rep. 1995;25(4):24–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Paris JJ, Cassem EH, Dec GW, Reardon FE. Use of a DNR order over family objections: the case of Gilgunn v. MGH. J Intensive Care Med. 1999;14(1):41–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Orr RD. The Gilgunn case: courage and questions. J Intensive Care Med. 1999;14(1):54–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Paris JJ. What standards apply to resuscitation at the borderline of gestational age? J Perinatol. 2005;25:683–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hippocratic corpus. The art. In: Reiser S, Dyck A, Curran W, editors. Ethics in medicine: historical perspectives and contemporary concerns. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1977.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Dictionary OE. “futile, adj.”: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Clark PA, Mikus CM. Time for a formalized medical futility policy. Mercy Health System’s procedures will help free its physicians from legal concerns. Health Prog. 2000;81(4):24–32.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Schneiderman LJ, Jecker NS, Jonsen AR. Medical futility: its meaning and ethical implications. Ann Intern Med. 1990;112(12):949–54.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Veatch RM, Spicer CM. Medically futile care: the role of the physician in setting limits. Am J Law Med. 1992;18(1–2):15–36.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Grant SB, Modi PK, Singer EA. Futility and the care of surgical patients: ethical dilemmas. World J Surg. 2014;38(7):1631–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Singer E. Medical futility: hippocratic fact or contemporary fiction? Washington, DC: Georgetown University; 2001.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Halevy A, Brody BA. A multi-institution collaborative policy on medical futility. JAMA. 1996;276(7):571–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Clarke MG, Ewings P, Hanna T, Dunn L, Girling T, Widdison AL. How accurate are doctors, nurses and medical students at predicting life expectancy? Eur J Intern Med. 2009;20(6):640–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Yourman LC, Lee SJ, Schonberg MA, Widera EW, Smith AK. Prognostic indices for older adults: a systematic review. JAMA. 2012;307(2):182–92.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Pellegrino E. Decision at the end of life: use and abuse of the concept of futility. Sgreccia JDDVCaE, editor. Citta del Vatticano: Libreria Editrice Vaticano; 2000.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Rowe CJ, Broadie S, editors. Nicomachean ethics. New York: Oxford University Press; 2002.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Svenaeus F. Empathy as a necessary condition of phronesis: a line of thought for medical ethics. Med Health Care Philos. 2014;17(2):293–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Consensus statement of the Society of Critical Care Medicine’s Ethics Committee regarding futile and other possibly inadvisable treatments. Crit Care Med. 1997;25(5):887–91.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Helft PR, Siegler M, Lantos J. The rise and fall of the futility movement. N Engl J Med. 2000;343(4):293–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Brett AS, McCullough LB. When patients request specific interventions: defining the limits of the physician’s obligation. N Engl J Med. 1986;315(21):1347–51.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Veatch RM. Why physicians cannot determine if care is futile. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1994;42(8):871–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Youngner SJ. Who defines futility? JAMA. 1988;260(14):2094–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Paris JJ, Reardon FE. Physician refusal of requests for futile or ineffective interventions. Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 1992;1(2):127–34.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Fine RL. Medical futility and the Texas Advance Directives Act of 1999. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2000;13(2):144–7.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Smith ML, Gremillion G, Slomka J, Warneke CL. Texas hospitals’ experience with the Texas advance directives Act. Crit Care Med. 2007;35(5):1271–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    California Health Care Decisions Law. 2005.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Maine Uniform Health-Care Decisions Act. 2005.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Maryland Health Care Decisions Act. 2006.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Massachusetts Health Care Proxies – Physicians; refusal to honor proxy. 2006.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    New York Health Care Agents and Proxies. 2006.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Tennessee Health Care Decisions Act, Determination of capacity – Compliance by health care provider or institution. 2006.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Virginia Health Care Decisions Act. 2006.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Washington Natural Death Act. 2006.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    American Medical Association Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs. Medical futility in end-of-life care. JAMA. 1999;281(10):937–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Bosslet GT, Pope TM, Rubenfeld GD, Lo B, Truog RD, Rushton CH, et al. An official ATS/AACN/ACCP/ESICM/SCCM policy statement: responding to requests for potentially inappropriate treatments in intensive care units. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015;191(11):1318–30.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Rowland KJ, Kodner IJ, Cashen M, Schwarze ML. Surgical futility: “Aggressive” surgery on the severely demented. Surgery. 2009;145(4):351–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Jones JW, McCullough LB. I know about Jack and you’re no Jack Kevorkian. J Vasc Surg. 2010;52(2):489–90.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Zier LS, Burack JH, Micco G, Chipman AK, Frank JA, Luce JM, et al. Doubt and belief in physicians’ ability to prognosticate during critical illness: the perspective of surrogate decision makers. Crit Care Med. 2008;36(8):2341–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Grossman E, Angelos P. Futility: what Cool Hand Luke can teach the surgical community. World J Surg. 2009;33(7):1338–40.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Nurok M, Sadovnikoff N. Why are we doing this case? can perioperative futile care be defined? Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2013;26(2):176–81.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Barnato AE, McClellan MB, Kagay CR, Garber AM. Trends in inpatient treatment intensity among Medicare beneficiaries at the end of life. Health Serv Res. 2004;39(2):363–75.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Emanuel EJ, Ash A, Yu W, Gazelle G, Levinsky NG, Saynina O, et al. Managed care, hospice use, site of death, and medical expenditures in the last year of life. Arch Intern Med. 2002;162(15):1722–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Zhang B, Wright AA, Huskamp HA, Nilsson ME, Maciejewski ML, Earle CC, et al. Health care costs in the last week of life: associations with end-of-life conversations. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(5):480–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Schwarze ML, Barnato AE, Rathouz PJ, Zhao Q, Neuman HB, Winslow ER, et al. Development of a list of high-risk operations for patients 65 years and older. JAMA Surg. 2015;150(4):325–31.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Lee TH, Marcantonio ER, Mangione CM, Thomas EJ, Polanczyk CA, Cook EF, et al. Derivation and prospective validation of a simple index for prediction of cardiac risk of major noncardiac surgery. Circulation. 1999;100(10):1043–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Goldman L, Caldera DL, Nussbaum SR, Southwick FS, Krogstad D, Murray B, et al. Multifactorial index of cardiac risk in noncardiac surgical procedures. N Engl J Med. 1977;297(16):845–50.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    L’Italien GJ, Paul SD, Hendel RC, Leppo JA, Cohen MC, Fleisher LA, et al. Development and validation of a Bayesian model for perioperative cardiac risk assessment in a cohort of 1,081 vascular surgical candidates. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996;27(4):779–86.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Menke H, Klein A, John KD, Junginger T. Predictive value of ASA classification for the assessment of the perioperative risk. Int Surg. 1993;78(3):266–70.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Wolters U, Wolf T, Stützer H, Schröder T. ASA classification and perioperative variables as predictors of postoperative outcome. Br J Anaesth. 1996;77(2):217–22.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Robinson TN, Wu DS, Sauaia A, Dunn CL, Stevens-Lapsley JE, Moss M, et al. Slower walking speed forecasts increased postoperative morbidity and 1-year mortality across surgical specialties. Ann Surg. 2013;258(4):582–8; discussion 8–90.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Makary MA, Segev DL, Pronovost PJ, Syin D, Bandeen-Roche K, Patel P, et al. Frailty as a predictor of surgical outcomes in older patients. J Am Coll Surg. 2010;210(6):901–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Marshall JC, Cook DJ, Christou NV, Bernard GR, Sprung CL, Sibbald WJ. Multiple organ dysfunction score: a reliable descriptor of a complex clinical outcome. Crit Care Med. 1995;23(10):1638–52.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) surgical risk calculator. Available from: http://riskcalculator.facs.org/.
  67. 67.
    Bilimoria KY, Liu Y, Paruch JL, Zhou L, Kmiecik TE, Ko CY, et al. Development and evaluation of the universal ACS NSQIP surgical risk calculator: a decision aid and informed consent tool for patients and surgeons. J Am Coll Surg. 2013;217(5):833–42.e1–3.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Schuster DP. Everything that should be done – not everything that can be done. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1992;145:508–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Scott B. Grant
    • 1
  • Parth K. Modi
    • 2
  • Eric A. Singer
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of SurgeryRutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical SchoolNew BrunswickUSA
  2. 2.Department of Surgery, Division of UrologyRutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical SchoolNew BrunswickUSA
  3. 3.Department of Surgery, Section of Urologic OncologyRutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical SchoolNew BrunswickUSA

Personalised recommendations