Abstract
We review recent progress in understanding similarity judgments in cognition by means of quantum probability theory (QP) models. We begin by outlining some features of similarity judgments that have proven difficult to model by traditional approaches. We then briefly present a model of similarity judgments based on QP, and show how it can solve many of the problems faced by traditional approaches. Finally we look at some areas where the quantum model is currently less satisfactory, and discuss some open questions and areas for further work.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
It is often asserted that a superposition state such as \(|\psi \rangle \) represents thinking about \(|v_1\rangle \) and \(|v_2\rangle \) at the same time. This is incorrect. The correct interpretation of such a state is that it represents thinking about neither \(|v_1\rangle \) nor \(|v_2\rangle \) (Griffiths 2002).
References
Aerts, D., Gabora, L.: A theory of concepts and their combinations II: a Hilbert space representation. Kybernetes 34, 192–221 (2005)
Aerts, S., Kitto, K., Sitbon, L.: Similarity metrics within a point of view. In: Song, D., Melucci, M., Frommholz, I., Zhang, P., Wang, L., Arafat, S. (eds.) QI 2011. LNCS, vol. 7052, pp. 13–24. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)
Ashby, G.F., Perrin, N.A.: Towards a unified theory of similarity and recognition. Psychol. Rev. 95, 124–150 (1988)
Atmanspacher, H., Romer, H., Wallach, H.: Weak quantum theory: formal framework and selected applications. Weak quantum theory: complementarity and entanglement in physics and beyond. Found. Phys. 32, 379–406 (2006)
Bowdle, B.F., Medin, D.L.: Reference-point reasoning and comparison asymmetries. In: Moore, J.D., Stenning, K. (eds.) Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 116–121. Psychology Press, New York (2001)
Busemeyer, J.R., Bruza, P.: Quantum Models of Cognition and Decision Making. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2011)
Busemeyer, J.R., Pothos, E.M., Franco, R., Trueblood, J.: A quantum theoretical explanation for probability judgment errors. Psychol. Rev. 118, 193–218 (2011)
De Deyne, S., Verheyen, S., Ameel, E., Vanpaemel, W., Dry, M.J., Voorspoels, W., Storms, G.: Exemplar by feature applicability matrices and other Dutch normative data for semantic concepts. Behav. Res. Meth. 40, 1030–1048 (2008)
Goldstone, R.L.: The role of similarity in categorization: providing a groundwork. Cognition 52, 125–157 (1994)
Goodman, N.: Seven strictures on similarity. In: Goodman, N. (ed.) Problems and Projects, pp. 437–447. Bobbs-Merrill, Indianapolis (1972)
Griffiths, R.B.: Consistent Quantum Theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2002)
Jones, M.N., Gruenenfelder, T.M., Recchia, G.: In defense of spatial models of lexical semantics. In: Carlson, L., Hlscher, C., Shipley, T. (eds.) Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 3444–3449. Cognitive Science Society, Austin (2011)
Khrennikov, A.Y.: Ubiquitous Quantum Structure: From Psychology to Finance. Springer, Berlin (2010)
Michelbacher, L., Evert, S., Schtze, H.: Asymmetry in corpus-derived and human word associations. Corpus Linguist. Linguist. Theor. 7(2), 245–276 (2011)
Nosofsky, R.M.: Choice, similarity, and the context theory of classification. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 10, 104–114 (1984)
Parducci, A.: Category judgment: a range-frequency model. Psychol. Rev. 72, 407–418 (1965)
Polk, T.A., Behensky, C., Gonzalez, R., Smith, E.E.: Rating the similarity of simple perceptual stimuli: asymmetries induced by manipulating exposure frequency. Cognition 82, B75–B88 (2002)
Pothos, E.M.: The rules versus similarity distinction. Behav. Brain Sci. 28, 1–49 (2005)
Pothos, E.M., Busemeyer, J.R., Trueblood, J.S.: A quantum geometric model of similarity. Psychol. Rev. 120, 679–696 (2013)
Rosch, E.: Cognitive reference points. Cogn. Psychol. 7, 532–547 (1975)
Trueblood, J.S., Brown, S.D., Heathcote, A., Busemeyer, J.R.: Not just for consumers: context effects are fundamental to decision-making. Psychol. Sci. 24(6), 901–908 (2013)
Tversky, A.: Features of similarity. Psychol. Rev. 84, 327–352 (1977)
Yearsley, J.M., Pothos, E.M., Hampton, J.A., Barque Duran, A.: Context effects in similarity judgments (in preparation)
Acknowledgments
E.M.P. and J.M.Y. were supported by Leverhulme Trust grant no. RPG-2013-00. Further, E.M.P. was supported by Air Force Office of Scientific Research (AFOSR), Air Force Material Command, USAF, grants no. FA 8655-13-1-3044. The US Government is authorized to reproduce and distribute reprints for Governmental purpose notwithstanding any copyright notation thereon.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Yearsley, J.M., Pothos, E.M., Hampton, J.A., Barque Duran, A. (2015). Towards a Quantum Probability Theory of Similarity Judgments. In: Atmanspacher, H., Bergomi, C., Filk, T., Kitto, K. (eds) Quantum Interaction. QI 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8951. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15931-7_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15931-7_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-15930-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-15931-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)