Abstract
In this chapter, Translating the Global Script of the Sustainable University: The Case of the University of Oslo, Rómulo Pinheiro, Maryam Faghihimani and Jarle Trondal discuss the green strategy of University of Oslo. This chapter, which is conceptually based on neo-institutional theory, approaches the notion of the ‘sustainable organisation’ as a global, legitimate script, i.e. a dominant hegemonic idea which, once adopted and consequently adapted locally, is likely to enhance both internal and external legitimacy. This analysis is built on the empirical case of the University of Oslo (UiO), that sheds light on the ways in which the notion of a ‘sustainable university’ has been locally ‘translated’ in order to fit (be aligned with) contextual circumstances, including path- and resource- dependencies, strategic intentions and aspirations, and internal values and norms. More specifically, the chapter investigates the rationale for, and the key actors behind, the design and subsequent implementation of a ‘sustainable strategic platform’ at UiO, and casts light on the degree of institutionalisation: rules, standard operating procedures and resource allocations across the board.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Beerkens, E. (2009). Centres of excellence and relevance: The contextualisation of global models. Science Technology Society, 14(1), 153–175.
Beerkens, E. (2010). Global models for the national research university: Adoption and adaptation in Indonesia and Malaysia. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 8(3), 369–381.
Benner, M., & Sörlin, S. (2007). Shaping strategic research: Power, resources, and interests in Swedish research policy. Minerva, 45(1), 31–48.
Benneworth, P., & Jongbloed, B. (2010). Who matters to universities? A stakeholder perspective on humanities, arts and social sciences valorisation. Higher Education, 59(5), 567–588.
Beringer, A. (2007). The Lüneburg sustainable university project in international comparison: An assessment against North American peers. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 8(4), 446–461.
Birnbaum, R. (1988). How colleges work: The cybernetics of academic organization and leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Birnbaum, R. (2000). Management fads in higher education: Where they come from, what they do, why they fail. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Brint, S. B., & Karabel, J. (1991). Institutional origins and transformations: The case of American community colleges. In W. Powell & P. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 337–360). Chicago, IL: University Chicago Press.
Brunsson, N., & Olsen, J. P. (1997). The reforming organization. Oslo: Fagforlaget.
Brunsson, N., & Sahlin-Andersson, K. (2000). Constructing organizations: The example of public sector reform. Organization Studies, 21(4), 721–746.
Camp, R. C. (1989). Benchmarking: The search for industry best practices that lead to superior performance. Milwaukee, WI: ASQC Quality Press.
Christensen, T., Lægreid, P., Roness, P. G., & Røvik, K. A. (2007). Organization theory and the public sector: Instrument, culture and myth. Milton Park: Taylor & Francis.
Charles, D., & Wilson, B. (2012). Managing regional engagement: The role of benchmarking. In R. Pinheiro, P. Benneworth, & G. A. Jones (Eds.), Universities and regional development: A critical assessment of tensions and contradiction (pp. 219–238). Milton Park: Routledge.
Clark, B. (1972). The organizational saga in higher education. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(1), 178–184.
Clark, B. R. (1998). Creating entrepreneurial universities: Organizational pathways of transformation. New York, NY: Pergamon.
Clark, B. R. (2004). Sustaining change in universities: Continuities in case studies and concepts. London: Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.
Cloete, N., Bailey, T., Pillay, P., Bunting, I., & Maassen, P. (2011). Universities and economic development in Africa. Cape Town: African Minds.
Czarniawska-Joerges, B., & Sevón, G. (2005). Global ideas: How ideas, objects and practices travel in a global economy. Copenhagen: Liber & Copenhagen Business School Press.
Deephouse, D., & Suchman, M. (2008). Legitimacy in organizational institutionalism. In G. Royston, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 49–77). London: Sage.
DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.
Drori, G. S., Meyer, J. W., & Hwang, H. (2006). Globalization and organization: World society and organizational change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Drori, I., & Honig, B. (2013). A process model of internal and external legitimacy. Organization Studies, 34(3), 345–376.
El-Khawas, E. (2002). Developing an academic career in a globalising world. In E. Jurgen & F. Oliver (Eds.), Higher education in a globalising world. International trends of mutual observations. A Festschrift in honour of Ulrich Teichler. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Espejo, R. (2003). The viable system: A briefing about organizational structure. London: SYNCHO Limited.
Faghihimani, M. (2012). A systemic approach for measuring environmental sustainability at higher education institutions. Oslo: University of Oslo.
Fisher, D., & Atkinson-Grosjean, J. (2002). Brokers on the boundary: Academy-industry liaison in Canadian universities. Higher Education, 44(3), 449–467.
Fleming, R., & Lee, G. R. (2009). Canada: Whats in a Title? In N. Garrod & B. Macfarlane (Eds.), Challenging boundaries: Managing the integration of post-secondary education (pp. 93–110). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
Flood, R. L., & Carson, E. R. (1993). Dealing with complexity: An introduction to the theory and application of systems science. New York, NY: Springer.
Frølich, N., Kalpazidou Schmid, E., & Rosa, M. J. (2010). Funding systems for higher education and their impacts on institutional strategies and academia: A comparative perspective. International Journal of Educational Management, 24(1), 7–21.
Fumasoli, T., Pinheiro, R., & Stensaker, B. (2014). Strategizing identity in higher education (ISL Working Paper, 2014:3). Department of Political Science and Management, University of Agder.
Gornitzka, A. (2007). The Lisbon process: A supranational policy perspective. In M. Peter & J. P. Olsen (Eds.), University dynamics and European integration (pp. 155–178). The Netherlands: Springer.
Gornitzka, A., Maassen, P., Olsen, J. P., & Stensaker, B. (2007). “Europe of knowledge:” Search for a new pact. In P. Maassen & J. P. Olsen (Eds.), University dynamics and European integration (pp. 181–214). The Netherlands: Springer.
Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Sahlin, K., & Suddaby, R. (2008). The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism. London: Sage.
Greenwood, R., Raynard, M., Kodeih, F., Micelotta, E. R., & Lounsbury, M. (2011). Institutional complexity and organizational responses. The Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 317–371.
Hazelkorn, H. (2009). Rankings and the battle for world-class excellence: Institutional strategies and policy choice. Higher Education Management and Policy, 21(1), 1–22.
Hölttä, S., & Karjalainen, K. (1997). Cybernetic institutional management theory and practice. Tertiary Education and Management, 3(3), 229–236.
Huisman, J., Norgård, J. D., Rasmussen, J., & Stensaker, B. (2002). ‘Alternative’ universities revisited: A study of the distinctiveness of universities established in the spirit of 1968. Tertiary Education and Management, 8(4), 316–332.
Jennings, P. D., & Zandbergen, P. A. (1995). Ecologically sustainable organizations: An institutional approach. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 1015–1052.
Jongbloed, B., Enders, J., & Salerno, C. (2008). Higher education and its communities: Interconnections, interdependencies and a research agenda. Higher Education, 56(3), 303–324.
Karksen, J. E., & Pritchard, R. (2013). Resilient universities: Confronting changes in a challenging world. Oxford: Peter Lang.
Kehm, B. M., & Stensaker, B. (2009). University rankings, diversity, and the new landscape of higher education. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Kehm, B. M., & Teichler, U. (2013). The academic profession in Europe: New tasks and new challenges. Dordrecht: Springer.
Klemenčič, S. B., & Primožič, R. (Eds.). (2015). Student engagement in Europe: Society, higher education and student governance (Council of Europe Higher Education Series, Vol. 20). Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing.
Krücken, G. (2003). Learning the ‘new, new thing’: On the role of path dependency in university structures. Higher Education, 46(3), 315–339.
Kyvik, S. (2009). The dynamics of change in higher education: Expansion and contraction in an organisational field. Dordrecht: Springer.
Maassen, P., & Olsen, J. P. (2007). University dynamics and European integration. Dordrecht: Springer.
Maassen, P., & Stensaker, B. (2011). The knowledge triangle, European higher education policy logics and policy implications. Higher Education, 61(6), 757–769.
March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (2006a). Elaborating the “new institutionalism”. In R. A. Rhodes, S. A. Binder, & B. A. Rockman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political institutions (pp. 3–22). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (2006b). The logic of appropriateness. In M. Moran, M. Rein, & R. Goodin (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of public policy (pp. 689–708). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
March, J. G., Schulz, M., & Zhou, X. (2000). The dynamics of rules. Change in written organizational codes. Stanford, CA: California University Press.
Marginson, S. (2006). Dynamics of national and global competition in higher education. Higher Education, 52(1), 1–39.
Meyer, A. D., & Rowan, B. (1991). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. In W. W. Powell & P. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 41–62). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363.
Mohrman, K. (2008). The emerging global model with Chinese characteristics. Higher Education Policy, 21(1), 29–48.
Morphew, C., & Huisman, J. (2002). Using institutional theory to reframe research on academic drift. Higher Education in Europe, 27, 491–506.
Olsen, J. P. (2007). The institutional dynamics of the European university. In P. Maassen & J. P. Olsen (Eds.), University dynamics and European integration (pp. 25–54). Dordrecht: Springer.
Orton, J. D., & Weick, K. E. (1990). Loosely coupled systems: A reconceptualization. The Academy of Management Review, 15(2), 203–223.
Pfeffer, J. (2010). Building sustainable organizations: The human factor. Academy of Management Perspectives, 24(1), 34–45.
Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (2003). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. Stanford, CA: Stanford Business Books.
Pinheiro, R. (2012). University ambiguity and institutionalization: A tale of three regions. In R. Pinheiro, P. Benneworth, & G. A. Jones (Eds.), Universities and regional development: A critical assessment of tensions and contradictions (pp. 35–55). Milton Park: Routledge.
Pinheiro, R. (2012a). In the region, for the region? A comparative study of the institutionalisation of the regional mission of universities. Oslo: University of Oslo.
Pinheiro, R. (2012b). University ambiguity and institutionalization: A tale of three regions. In R. Pinheiro, P. Benneworth, & G. A. Jones (Eds.), Universities and regional development: A critical assessment of tensions and contradictions (pp. 35–55). Milton Park; New York, NY: Routledge.
Pinheiro, R. (2013). Bridging the local with the global: Building a new university on the fringes of Europe. Tertiary Education and Management, 19(2), 144–160. doi:10.1080/13583883.2013.782063.
Pinheiro, R., Geschwind, L., & Aarrevaara, T. (2014). Nested tensions and interwoven dilemmas in higher education: The view from the Nordic countries. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 7(2), 233–250.
Pinheiro, R., Geschwind, L., & Aarrevaara, T. (2014). Nested tensions and interwoven dilemmas in higher education: The view from the Nordic countries. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 7(2), 233–250. doi:10.1093/cjres/rsu002.
Pinheiro, R., & Stensaker, B. (2013). Designing the entrepreneurial university: The interpretation of a global idea. Public Organization Review, 1–20.
Pinheiro, R., & Hauge, E. (2014). Global scripts and local translations: The case of cultural and creative industries (CCIs) in Norway. City, Culture and Society, 5(2), 87–95. doi:10.1016/j.ccs.2014.05.007.
Pinheiro, R., & Trondal, J. (2014). Loose- or tight- coupling? Exploring the interplay between decopling, slack and resilience in universities. Paper presented at the European forum for studies of policies for research and innovation, Manchester, June 18–20.
Powell, W. W., & DiMaggio, P. (1991). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Ramirez, F. O. (2010). Accounting for excellence: Transforming universities into organizational actors. In L. Portnoi, V. Rust, & S. Bagely (Eds.), Higher education, policy, and the global competition phenomenon (pp. 43–58). Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Rip, A. (2004). Strategic research, post-modern universities and research training. Higher Education Policy, 17(2), 153–166.
Rodriguez, M. A., Ricart, J. E., & Sanchez, P. (2002). Sustainable development and the sustainability of competitive advantage: A dynamic and sustainable view of the firm. Creativity and Innovation Management, 11(3), 135–146.
Sahlin, K., & Wedlin, L. (2008). Circulating ideas: Imitation, translation and editing. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 218–242). London: Sage.
Sahlin-Andersson, K. (1996). Imitating by editing success: The construction of organizational fields. In B. Czarniawska & G. Sévon (Eds.), Translating organizational change (pp. 69–92). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Sammalisto, K., & Arvidsson, K. (2005). Environmental management in Swedish higher education: Directives, driving forces, hindrances, environmental aspects and environmental co-ordinators in Swedish universities. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 6(1), 18–35.
Schwartzman, S., Pinheiro, R., & Pillay, P. (2015). Higher education in the BRICS countries: Investigating the pact between higher education and society. Dordrecht: Springer.
Scott, W. R. (2013). Institutions and organizations: Ideas, interests and identities. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Scott, W. R., & Christensen, S. (1995). The institutional construction of organizations: International and longitudinal studies. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
Selznick, P. (1949). TVA and the grass roots: A study in the sociology of formal organization. Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.
Selznick, P. (1996). Institutionalism “old” and “new”. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(2), 270–277.
Sahlin-Andersson, K., & Engwall, L. (Eds.). (2002). The expansion of management knowledge: Carriers, flows, and sources. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Starik, M., & Rands, G. P. (1995). Weaving an integrated web: Multilevel and multisystem perspectives of ecologically sustainable organizations. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 908–935.
Sterling, S. (2004). Higher education, sustainability, and the role of systemic learning. In P. Corcoran & A. Wals (Eds.), Higher education and the challenge of sustainability: Problematic, problems, and practice (pp. 47–70). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Trondal, J. (2015). Ambiguities in organizations and the routines of behavior and change. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 23(1), 123–141.
UNESCO. (1972). Declaration of the United Nations conference on the human environment. Paris: UNESCO. Online at: http://www.unep.org/Documents.Multilingual/Default.asp?documentid=97&articleid=1503
UNESCO/UNEP. (1977). Intergovernmental conference on environmental education. Tbilisi: UNESCO.
Wangenge-Ouma, G., & Fongwa, S. (2012). National universities and the regional dimension: A dilemma? In R. Pinheiro, P. Benneworth, & G. A. Jones (Eds.), Universities and regional development: A critical assessment of tensions and contradictions. Milton Park; New York, NY: Routledge.
World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Report of the world commission on environment and development: Our common future. Chaired by Gro Harlem Brundtland. Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427—Development and International Co-operation: Environment. New York, NY: United Nations.
Zechlin, L. (2010). Strategic planning in higher education. In P. Penelope, B. Eva, & M. G. Barry (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education (pp. 256–263). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pinheiro, R., Faghihimani, M., Trondal, J. (2015). Translating the Global Script of the Sustainable University: The Case of the University of Oslo. In: Johnsen, H., Torjesen, S., Ennals, R. (eds) Higher Education in a Sustainable Society. CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15919-5_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15919-5_13
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-15918-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-15919-5
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsBusiness and Management (R0)