Skip to main content

Translating the Global Script of the Sustainable University: The Case of the University of Oslo

  • Chapter
Higher Education in a Sustainable Society

Abstract

In this chapter, Translating the Global Script of the Sustainable University: The Case of the University of Oslo, Rómulo Pinheiro, Maryam Faghihimani and Jarle Trondal discuss the green strategy of University of Oslo. This chapter, which is conceptually based on neo-institutional theory, approaches the notion of the ‘sustainable organisation’ as a global, legitimate script, i.e. a dominant hegemonic idea which, once adopted and consequently adapted locally, is likely to enhance both internal and external legitimacy. This analysis is built on the empirical case of the University of Oslo (UiO), that sheds light on the ways in which the notion of a ‘sustainable university’ has been locally ‘translated’ in order to fit (be aligned with) contextual circumstances, including path- and resource- dependencies, strategic intentions and aspirations, and internal values and norms. More specifically, the chapter investigates the rationale for, and the key actors behind, the design and subsequent implementation of a ‘sustainable strategic platform’ at UiO, and casts light on the degree of institutionalisation: rules, standard operating procedures and resource allocations across the board.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Beerkens, E. (2009). Centres of excellence and relevance: The contextualisation of global models. Science Technology Society, 14(1), 153–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beerkens, E. (2010). Global models for the national research university: Adoption and adaptation in Indonesia and Malaysia. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 8(3), 369–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benner, M., & Sörlin, S. (2007). Shaping strategic research: Power, resources, and interests in Swedish research policy. Minerva, 45(1), 31–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benneworth, P., & Jongbloed, B. (2010). Who matters to universities? A stakeholder perspective on humanities, arts and social sciences valorisation. Higher Education, 59(5), 567–588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beringer, A. (2007). The Lüneburg sustainable university project in international comparison: An assessment against North American peers. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 8(4), 446–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birnbaum, R. (1988). How colleges work: The cybernetics of academic organization and leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birnbaum, R. (2000). Management fads in higher education: Where they come from, what they do, why they fail. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brint, S. B., & Karabel, J. (1991). Institutional origins and transformations: The case of American community colleges. In W. Powell & P. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 337–360). Chicago, IL: University Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunsson, N., & Olsen, J. P. (1997). The reforming organization. Oslo: Fagforlaget.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunsson, N., & Sahlin-Andersson, K. (2000). Constructing organizations: The example of public sector reform. Organization Studies, 21(4), 721–746.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camp, R. C. (1989). Benchmarking: The search for industry best practices that lead to superior performance. Milwaukee, WI: ASQC Quality Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, T., Lægreid, P., Roness, P. G., & Røvik, K. A. (2007). Organization theory and the public sector: Instrument, culture and myth. Milton Park: Taylor & Francis.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Charles, D., & Wilson, B. (2012). Managing regional engagement: The role of benchmarking. In R. Pinheiro, P. Benneworth, & G. A. Jones (Eds.), Universities and regional development: A critical assessment of tensions and contradiction (pp. 219–238). Milton Park: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, B. (1972). The organizational saga in higher education. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(1), 178–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, B. R. (1998). Creating entrepreneurial universities: Organizational pathways of transformation. New York, NY: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, B. R. (2004). Sustaining change in universities: Continuities in case studies and concepts. London: Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cloete, N., Bailey, T., Pillay, P., Bunting, I., & Maassen, P. (2011). Universities and economic development in Africa. Cape Town: African Minds.

    Google Scholar 

  • Czarniawska-Joerges, B., & Sevón, G. (2005). Global ideas: How ideas, objects and practices travel in a global economy. Copenhagen: Liber & Copenhagen Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deephouse, D., & Suchman, M. (2008). Legitimacy in organizational institutionalism. In G. Royston, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 49–77). London: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drori, G. S., Meyer, J. W., & Hwang, H. (2006). Globalization and organization: World society and organizational change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drori, I., & Honig, B. (2013). A process model of internal and external legitimacy. Organization Studies, 34(3), 345–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El-Khawas, E. (2002). Developing an academic career in a globalising world. In E. Jurgen & F. Oliver (Eds.), Higher education in a globalising world. International trends of mutual observations. A Festschrift in honour of Ulrich Teichler. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Espejo, R. (2003). The viable system: A briefing about organizational structure. London: SYNCHO Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faghihimani, M. (2012). A systemic approach for measuring environmental sustainability at higher education institutions. Oslo: University of Oslo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, D., & Atkinson-Grosjean, J. (2002). Brokers on the boundary: Academy-industry liaison in Canadian universities. Higher Education, 44(3), 449–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, R., & Lee, G. R. (2009). Canada: Whats in a Title? In N. Garrod & B. Macfarlane (Eds.), Challenging boundaries: Managing the integration of post-secondary education (pp. 93–110). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flood, R. L., & Carson, E. R. (1993). Dealing with complexity: An introduction to the theory and application of systems science. New York, NY: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Frølich, N., Kalpazidou Schmid, E., & Rosa, M. J. (2010). Funding systems for higher education and their impacts on institutional strategies and academia: A comparative perspective. International Journal of Educational Management, 24(1), 7–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fumasoli, T., Pinheiro, R., & Stensaker, B. (2014). Strategizing identity in higher education (ISL Working Paper, 2014:3). Department of Political Science and Management, University of Agder.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gornitzka, A. (2007). The Lisbon process: A supranational policy perspective. In M. Peter & J. P. Olsen (Eds.), University dynamics and European integration (pp. 155–178). The Netherlands: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gornitzka, A., Maassen, P., Olsen, J. P., & Stensaker, B. (2007). “Europe of knowledge:” Search for a new pact. In P. Maassen & J. P. Olsen (Eds.), University dynamics and European integration (pp. 181–214). The Netherlands: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Sahlin, K., & Suddaby, R. (2008). The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, R., Raynard, M., Kodeih, F., Micelotta, E. R., & Lounsbury, M. (2011). Institutional complexity and organizational responses. The Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 317–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hazelkorn, H. (2009). Rankings and the battle for world-class excellence: Institutional strategies and policy choice. Higher Education Management and Policy, 21(1), 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hölttä, S., & Karjalainen, K. (1997). Cybernetic institutional management theory and practice. Tertiary Education and Management, 3(3), 229–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huisman, J., Norgård, J. D., Rasmussen, J., & Stensaker, B. (2002). ‘Alternative’ universities revisited: A study of the distinctiveness of universities established in the spirit of 1968. Tertiary Education and Management, 8(4), 316–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jennings, P. D., & Zandbergen, P. A. (1995). Ecologically sustainable organizations: An institutional approach. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 1015–1052.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jongbloed, B., Enders, J., & Salerno, C. (2008). Higher education and its communities: Interconnections, interdependencies and a research agenda. Higher Education, 56(3), 303–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karksen, J. E., & Pritchard, R. (2013). Resilient universities: Confronting changes in a challenging world. Oxford: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kehm, B. M., & Stensaker, B. (2009). University rankings, diversity, and the new landscape of higher education. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kehm, B. M., & Teichler, U. (2013). The academic profession in Europe: New tasks and new challenges. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Klemenčič, S. B., & Primožič, R. (Eds.). (2015). Student engagement in Europe: Society, higher education and student governance (Council of Europe Higher Education Series, Vol. 20). Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krücken, G. (2003). Learning the ‘new, new thing’: On the role of path dependency in university structures. Higher Education, 46(3), 315–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kyvik, S. (2009). The dynamics of change in higher education: Expansion and contraction in an organisational field. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maassen, P., & Olsen, J. P. (2007). University dynamics and European integration. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Maassen, P., & Stensaker, B. (2011). The knowledge triangle, European higher education policy logics and policy implications. Higher Education, 61(6), 757–769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (2006a). Elaborating the “new institutionalism”. In R. A. Rhodes, S. A. Binder, & B. A. Rockman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political institutions (pp. 3–22). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (2006b). The logic of appropriateness. In M. Moran, M. Rein, & R. Goodin (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of public policy (pp. 689–708). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G., Schulz, M., & Zhou, X. (2000). The dynamics of rules. Change in written organizational codes. Stanford, CA: California University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marginson, S. (2006). Dynamics of national and global competition in higher education. Higher Education, 52(1), 1–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, A. D., & Rowan, B. (1991). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. In W. W. Powell & P. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 41–62). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohrman, K. (2008). The emerging global model with Chinese characteristics. Higher Education Policy, 21(1), 29–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morphew, C., & Huisman, J. (2002). Using institutional theory to reframe research on academic drift. Higher Education in Europe, 27, 491–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, J. P. (2007). The institutional dynamics of the European university. In P. Maassen & J. P. Olsen (Eds.), University dynamics and European integration (pp. 25–54). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Orton, J. D., & Weick, K. E. (1990). Loosely coupled systems: A reconceptualization. The Academy of Management Review, 15(2), 203–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J. (2010). Building sustainable organizations: The human factor. Academy of Management Perspectives, 24(1), 34–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (2003). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. Stanford, CA: Stanford Business Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinheiro, R. (2012). University ambiguity and institutionalization: A tale of three regions. In R. Pinheiro, P. Benneworth, & G. A. Jones (Eds.), Universities and regional development: A critical assessment of tensions and contradictions (pp. 35–55). Milton Park: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinheiro, R. (2012a). In the region, for the region? A comparative study of the institutionalisation of the regional mission of universities. Oslo: University of Oslo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinheiro, R. (2012b). University ambiguity and institutionalization: A tale of three regions. In R. Pinheiro, P. Benneworth, & G. A. Jones (Eds.), Universities and regional development: A critical assessment of tensions and contradictions (pp. 35–55). Milton Park; New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinheiro, R. (2013). Bridging the local with the global: Building a new university on the fringes of Europe. Tertiary Education and Management, 19(2), 144–160. doi:10.1080/13583883.2013.782063.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinheiro, R., Geschwind, L., & Aarrevaara, T. (2014). Nested tensions and interwoven dilemmas in higher education: The view from the Nordic countries. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 7(2), 233–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinheiro, R., Geschwind, L., & Aarrevaara, T. (2014). Nested tensions and interwoven dilemmas in higher education: The view from the Nordic countries. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 7(2), 233–250. doi:10.1093/cjres/rsu002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinheiro, R., & Stensaker, B. (2013). Designing the entrepreneurial university: The interpretation of a global idea. Public Organization Review, 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinheiro, R., & Hauge, E. (2014). Global scripts and local translations: The case of cultural and creative industries (CCIs) in Norway. City, Culture and Society, 5(2), 87–95. doi:10.1016/j.ccs.2014.05.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinheiro, R., & Trondal, J. (2014). Loose- or tight- coupling? Exploring the interplay between decopling, slack and resilience in universities. Paper presented at the European forum for studies of policies for research and innovation, Manchester, June 18–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, W. W., & DiMaggio, P. (1991). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramirez, F. O. (2010). Accounting for excellence: Transforming universities into organizational actors. In L. Portnoi, V. Rust, & S. Bagely (Eds.), Higher education, policy, and the global competition phenomenon (pp. 43–58). Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rip, A. (2004). Strategic research, post-modern universities and research training. Higher Education Policy, 17(2), 153–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez, M. A., Ricart, J. E., & Sanchez, P. (2002). Sustainable development and the sustainability of competitive advantage: A dynamic and sustainable view of the firm. Creativity and Innovation Management, 11(3), 135–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahlin, K., & Wedlin, L. (2008). Circulating ideas: Imitation, translation and editing. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 218–242). London: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sahlin-Andersson, K. (1996). Imitating by editing success: The construction of organizational fields. In B. Czarniawska & G. Sévon (Eds.), Translating organizational change (pp. 69–92). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sammalisto, K., & Arvidsson, K. (2005). Environmental management in Swedish higher education: Directives, driving forces, hindrances, environmental aspects and environmental co-ordinators in Swedish universities. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 6(1), 18–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartzman, S., Pinheiro, R., & Pillay, P. (2015). Higher education in the BRICS countries: Investigating the pact between higher education and society. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W. R. (2013). Institutions and organizations: Ideas, interests and identities. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W. R., & Christensen, S. (1995). The institutional construction of organizations: International and longitudinal studies. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selznick, P. (1949). TVA and the grass roots: A study in the sociology of formal organization. Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selznick, P. (1996). Institutionalism “old” and “new”. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(2), 270–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahlin-Andersson, K., & Engwall, L. (Eds.). (2002). The expansion of management knowledge: Carriers, flows, and sources. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Starik, M., & Rands, G. P. (1995). Weaving an integrated web: Multilevel and multisystem perspectives of ecologically sustainable organizations. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 908–935.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterling, S. (2004). Higher education, sustainability, and the role of systemic learning. In P. Corcoran & A. Wals (Eds.), Higher education and the challenge of sustainability: Problematic, problems, and practice (pp. 47–70). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trondal, J. (2015). Ambiguities in organizations and the routines of behavior and change. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 23(1), 123–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO. (1972). Declaration of the United Nations conference on the human environment. Paris: UNESCO. Online at: http://www.unep.org/Documents.Multilingual/Default.asp?documentid=97&articleid=1503

  • UNESCO/UNEP. (1977). Intergovernmental conference on environmental education. Tbilisi: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wangenge-Ouma, G., & Fongwa, S. (2012). National universities and the regional dimension: A dilemma? In R. Pinheiro, P. Benneworth, & G. A. Jones (Eds.), Universities and regional development: A critical assessment of tensions and contradictions. Milton Park; New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Report of the world commission on environment and development: Our common future. Chaired by Gro Harlem Brundtland. Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427—Development and International Co-operation: Environment. New York, NY: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zechlin, L. (2010). Strategic planning in higher education. In P. Penelope, B. Eva, & M. G. Barry (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education (pp. 256–263). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rómulo Pinheiro .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pinheiro, R., Faghihimani, M., Trondal, J. (2015). Translating the Global Script of the Sustainable University: The Case of the University of Oslo. In: Johnsen, H., Torjesen, S., Ennals, R. (eds) Higher Education in a Sustainable Society. CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15919-5_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics