Skip to main content

Imaging in Breast-Related Diseases

  • Chapter
  • 1125 Accesses

Abstract

• Currently mammography, ultrasound and magnetic resonance are the best radiological imaging modalities for both diagnosis and local staging of breast cancer. To date, there is no evidence on the utility of other emerging diagnostic tools. • The results of imaging are very different if performed as screening procedures in asymptomatic women or as diagnostic procedure in a symptomatic patient. • Mammography is the best technique for a panoramic image; ultrasound is an essential component for localised symptoms and for guided tissue sampling. • Mammography is the technique of choice for a BC screening protocol, but MRI is the technique of choice for very young women at high risk.

Future directions. Emerging technologies in breast imaging have resulted in an explosion of areas of investigation: the newer versions of digital mammography including tomosynthesis and digital subtraction mammography, the latest individualised screening strategies that stratify patients with different tools especially for women at high risk and the wide-ranging use of imaging to monitor and adjust efficacy of neoadjuvant regimens in the course of therapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Pisano ED, Gatsonsis C, Hendrick E, et al. Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast cancer screening. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:1773–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Dongola N. Mammography in breast cancer. http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/346529-overview#showall. Accessed 30 Jan 2015.

  3. Thrush S, Dixon JM. The role of imaging in breast diagnosis including screening and excision of impalpable lesions. In: Dixon JM, editor. Breast surgery. 5th ed. London: Elsevier; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kuhl CK, Schrading S, Leutner CC, et al. Mammography, breast ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging for surveillance of women at high familial risk for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:8469–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Shah SH, et al. Current role of magnetic resonance imaging in breast imaging: a primer for the primary care physician. http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/518406_7.

  6. Sardanelli F, Boetes C, Borisch B, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast: recommendations from the EUSOMA working group. Eur J Cancer. 2010;46:1296–316.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lin J. 3D mammography. http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/1970908-overview#showall. Accessed 30 Jan 2015.

  8. Eston TF. Breast positron emission tomography. http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/2109054-overview#showall. Accessed 30 Jan 2015.

Further Reading

  • American College of Radiology. ACR practice parameter for the performance of screening and diagnostic mammography (Amended 2014). www.acr.org/~/media/ACR/Documents/PGTS/guidelines/Screening_Mammography.pdf.

  • Ciatto S, Houssami N, Bernardi D, et al. Integration of 3D digital mammography with tomosynthesis for population breast-cancer screening (STORM): a prospective comparison study. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14:583–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Houssami N, Ciatto S, Macaskill P, et al. Accuracy and surgical impact of magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer staging: systematic review and meta-analysis in detection of multifocal and multicentric cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:3248–58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Koomen M, Pisano ED, Kuzmiak C, Pavic D, McLelland R. Future directions in breast imaging. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:1674–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Saslow D, Boetes C, Burke W, et al. American Cancer Society guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography. CA Cancer J Clin. 2007;57:75–89.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Torjesen I. How much is too much breast screening? BMJ. 2015;350:h139.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Warner E, Hill K, Causer P, et al. Prospective study of breast cancer incidence in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation under surveillance with and without magnetic resonance imaging. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:1664–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Websites in Appendix: Imaging, A-4.11.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gianni Saguatti .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Saguatti, G., Tosi, E. (2015). Imaging in Breast-Related Diseases. In: Pluchinotta, A. (eds) The Outpatient Breast Clinic. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15907-2_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15907-2_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-15906-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-15907-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics