Skip to main content

The Asymptomatic Woman

  • Chapter
The Outpatient Breast Clinic

Abstract

• Before a woman is a patient, she is a woman with her own biography. • The way a woman looks at her breast is a good indicator of her degree of self-confidence. • Women generally overestimate their risk of developing BC and, as a consequence, overrate the benefits that may be gained from screening or preventive measures. • Although many women with a strong family history do not have an identified genetic mutation, their potential serious risk should be properly considered. • BRCA1 and BRCA2 do not have the same effects, and recent reports show BRCA2 carriers are associated with better survival and therapeutic response than BRCA1 carriers.

Future Directions. Every woman faces the risk of developing cancer or she believes she does. Every diagnosis of BC may involve the entire family, while several half-truths and distortions are an obstacle to objectivity. The most challenging element in communication, becoming more and more crucial, is the actual perception and classification of the risk.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Baum M, Schipper H. Perception of the risk. In: Baum M, Schipper H, editors. Breast cancer. 3rd ed. Oxford: Health Press; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cardoso F, Loibl S, Pagani O, et al. The European Society of Breast Cancer Specialists recommendations for the management of young women with breast cancer. Euro J Cancer. 2012;48:3355–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cancer Research UK. Breast cancer risk factors. http://www.cancerresearchuk.org/cancer-info/cancerstats/types/breast/riskfactors/breast-cancer-risk-factors.

  4. National Cancer Institute. Breast cancer screening. http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/pdq/screening/breast/healthprofessional/page4.

  5. Radiopaedia. Interval breast cancer. http://radiopaedia.org/articles/interval-breast-cancer.

  6. Evans AJ, Pinder SE, Ellis IO, et al. Screen detected ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS): overdiagnosis or an obligate precursor of invasive disease? J Med Screen. 2001;8:149–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Foucar E. Addressing overdiagnosis and overtreatment in cancer. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15:306–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Larsen MJ, Thomassen M, Gerdes AM, Kruse TA. Hereditary breast cancer: clinical, pathological and molecular characteristics. Breast Cancer. 2014;15(8):145–55.

    Google Scholar 

  9. BRACAnalisis. http://www.myriad.com/products-services/hereditary-cancers/bracanalysis/. National Comprehensive Cancer Network (MCCN) Guidelines. NCCN Guidelines for Detection, Prevention & Risk Reduction (revised 2011). In: http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/f_guidelines.asp.

  10. Gareth D, Evans R, Hoell A. Breast cancer risk-assessment models. In: http://breast-cancer-research.com/content/9/5/213.

  11. Vogel VG, Costantino JP, Wickerham DL, et al. Update of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Study of Tamoxifen and Raloxifene (STAR) P–2 Trial: preventing breast cancer. Cancer Prevent Res. 2010;3(6):696–706.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Cuzick J, Forbes J, Edwards R, et al. First results from the International Breast Cancer Intervention Study (IBIS-I): a randomised prevention trial. Lancet. 2002;360:817–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Vogel VG. The NSABP Study of Tamoxifen and Raloxifene (STAR) trial. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2009;9:51–60.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hartmann LC, Schaid DJ, Woods JE, et al. Efficacy of bilateral prophylactic mastectomy in women with a family history of breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 1999;340:77–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Evans DGR, Baildam AD. The genetics of breast cancer, risk-reducing surgery and prevention. In: Dixon JM, editor. Breast surgery. London: Elsevier; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Petit JY, Greco M. Quality control in prophylactic mastectomy for women at high risk of breast cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2002;38:22–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Frost MH, Schaid DJ, Sellers TA, et al. Long-term satisfaction and psychological and social function following bilateral prophylactic mastectomy. JAMA. 2000;284(3):19–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Rebbeck TR, Lynch HT, Neuhausen SL, et al. Prophylactic oophorectomy in carriers of BRCA 1 or BRCA2 mutations. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:1616–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Further Reading

  • American College of Radiology. ACR practice parameter for the performance of screening and diagnostic mammography (Amended 2014). www.acr.org/~/media/ACR/Documents/PGTS/guidelines/Screening_Mammography.pdf.

  • Balmaña J, Díez O, Rubio IT, Cardoso F On behalf of the ESMO Guidelines Working Group. BRCA in breast cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines. Ann Oncol. 2011;22 (Suppl. 6): vi31–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beitsch PD, Whithworth PW. Can breast surgeons provide breast cancer genetic testing? An American Society of Breast Surgeons survey. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21:4104–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cuzick J, Sestak I, Bonanni B, et al. Selective oestrogen receptor modulators in prevention of breast cancer: an updated meta-analysis of individual participant data. Lancet. 2013;381:1827–34.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cuzick J, Sestak I, Forbes JF, et al. Anastrozole for prevention of breast cancer in high-risk postmenopausal women (IBIS-II): an international, double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2014;383:1041–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Domchek SM. Evolution of genetic testing for inherited susceptibility to breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(4):295–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Euhus DM, Diaz J. Breast cancer prevention. Breast J. 2015;21:76–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Independent UK Panel on Breast Cancer Screening. The benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: an independent review. Lancet. 2012;380:1778–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melchor L, Benitez J. The complex genetic landscape of familial breast cancer. Hum Genet. 2013;132:845–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Metcalfe K, Gershman S, Ghadirian P. Contralateral mastectomy and survival after breast cancer in carriers of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations: retrospective analysis. BMJ. 2014;348:g226.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moyer VA on behalf of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Risk assessment, genetic counseling, and genetic testing for BRCA-related cancer in women: U.S. preventive services task force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2014;160:271–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rich TA, Woodson AH, Litton J, Atun B. Hereditary breast cancer syndromes and genetic testing. J Surg Oncol. 2015;111:66–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Visvanathan K, Hurley P, Bantug E, et al. Use of pharmacologic interventions for breast cancer risk reduction: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:2942–62. Erratum in: J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:4383.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Websites in Appendix: Screening, A-4.11; Risk Factors/Genetics, A-4.19.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alfonso M. Pluchinotta .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pluchinotta, A.M., Saguatti, G., Zuccarello, D. (2015). The Asymptomatic Woman. In: Pluchinotta, A. (eds) The Outpatient Breast Clinic. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15907-2_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15907-2_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-15906-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-15907-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics