Skip to main content

Recommendations for Medical Treatment Processes: The PIGS Approach

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Business Process Management Workshops (BPM 2014)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 202))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Medical treatment processes in hospitals are complex interactions of various actors, in the course of which treatment decisions have to be made.Clinical practice guidelines and clinical pathways provide guidance for practicioners for certain diseases. Especially for multi-morbid patients several guidelines and pathways might apply. Current process-oriented IT support in hospitals, however, does not consider multiple models for treatment recommendations.

In this contribution we define Treatment Cases (TCs) and give an operational semantics for their evolution based on Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN) models, which we use to model guidelines, pathways and standard operating procedures. This work is part of the Process Information and Guidance System (PIGS) approach, which aims at providing an overview of treatment history and give recommendations based on the current treatment state and multiple process models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://www.cossac.org/tallis, built on PROforma.

  2. 2.

    http://jbpm.jboss.org.

References

  1. Weske, M.: Business Process Management: Concepts, Languages, Architectures, 2nd edn. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Grimshaw, J.M., Russel, I.T.: Effect of clinical guidelines on medical practice: a systematic review of rigorous evaluations. Lancet 342(8883), 1317–1322 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sutton, D.R., Fox, J.: The syntax and semantics of the PROforma guideline modeling language. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 10(5), 433–443 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Boxwala, A.A., Peleg, M., Tu, S., Ogunyemi, O., Zeng, Q.T., Wang, D., Patel, V.L., Greenes, R.A., Shortliffe, E.H.: GLIF3: a representation format for sharable computer-interpretable CPGs. J. Biomed. Inform. 37(3), 147–161 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Quaglini, S., Stefanelli, M., Cavallini, A., Micieli, G., Fassino, C., Mossa, C.: Guideline-based careflow systems. Artif. Intell. Med. 20(1), 5–22 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Scheuerlein, H., Rauchfuss, F., Dittmar, Y., Molle, R., Lehmann, T., Pienkos, N., Settmacher, U.: New methods for clinical pathways - business process modeling notation (BPMN) and tangible business process modeling (t.BPM). Langenbecks. Arch. Surg. 397(5), 755–761 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. ISO/IEC: Information technology - object management group business process model and notation. Technical Report 19510, ISO/IEC, July 2013

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hewelt, M.: Process information and guidance systems in the hospital. In: KR4HC 2014 workshop proceedings (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Milla-Millán, G., Fdez-Olivares, J., Sánchez-Garzón, I.: A common-recipe and conflict-solving MAP approach for care planning in comorbid patients. In: Bielza, C., Salmerón, A., Alonso-Betanzos, A., Hidalgo, J.I., Martínez, L., Troncoso, A., Corchado, E., Corchado, J.M. (eds.) CAEPIA 2013. LNCS, vol. 8109, pp. 178–187. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Sánchez-Garzón, I., Fdez-Olivares, J., Onaindía, E., Milla, G., Jordán, J., Castejón, P.: A multi-agent planning approach for the generation of personalized treatment plans of comorbid patients. In: Peek, N., Marín Morales, R., Peleg, M. (eds.) AIME 2013. LNCS, vol. 7885, pp. 23–27. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Alexandrou, D.A., Skitsas, I.E., Mentzas, G.N.: A Holistic Environment for the Design and Execution of Self-Adaptive Clinical Pathways. IEEE Trans. Inform. Technol. Biomed. 15(1), 108–118 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Pryss, R., Langer, D., Reichert, M., Hallerbach, A.: Mobile task management for medical ward rounds – the MEDo approach. In: La Rosa, M., Soffer, P. (eds.) BPM Workshops 2012. LNBIP, vol. 132, pp. 43–54. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. jBPM team, T.J.: jBPM Documentation - User Guide. jboss.org. 6.0.1.Final edn., November 2013

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marcin Hewelt .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hewelt, M., Kunde, A., Weske, M., Meinel, C. (2015). Recommendations for Medical Treatment Processes: The PIGS Approach. In: Fournier, F., Mendling, J. (eds) Business Process Management Workshops. BPM 2014. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 202. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15895-2_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15895-2_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-15894-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-15895-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics