Skip to main content

vrBPMN* and FM: An Approach to Model Business Process Line

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Business Process Management Workshops (BPM 2014)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 202))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Recently, Business Process Management (BPM) has increasing demanded reuse of business process models. In order to represent these models, diverse techniques have been used, such as the variability management and business process configuration, arising the Business Process Line (BPL) area. In order to model BPL, the joint use of vrBPMN (varant-rich Business Process Model and Notation) and Feature Model (FM) has been considered as a relevant alternative. However, there is a kind of FM elements that does not have a properly correspondent in vrBPMN, that is, the IOR element. In addition to that, FM and vrBPMN have some redundant informations. The main contribution of this paper is to propose an extension to the vrBPMN notation, named vrBPMN*, and, together with FM, makes it possible to adequately model BPL. We conducted an empirical study to analyze the viability of using vrPBMN* and FM to model business process, as well as their building time and correctness. As main results, we have observed that the proposed notation favours business process modeling, reducing time and increasing correctness of produced models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. van der Aalst, W., Lohmann, N., La Rosa, M., Xu, J.: Correctness ensuring process configuration: an approach based on partner synthesis. In: Hull, R., Mendling, J., Tai, S. (eds.) BPM 2010. LNCS, vol. 6336, pp. 95–111. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Boffoli, N., Caivano, D., Castelluccia, D., Visaggio, G.: Driving flexibility and consistency of business processes by means of product-line engineering and decision tables. In: 3rd International Workshop on Product Line Approaches in Software Engineering, Zurich, pp. 33–36 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chang, J.F.: Business Process Management System - Strategy and Implementation, 1st edn. Auerbach Publications, Boca Raton (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chinosi, M., Trombetta, A.: Bpmn: an introduction to the standard. Comput. Stand. Interfaces 34(1), 124–134 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gottschalk, F., Aalst, W., Jansen-Vullers, M.: Configurable process models–a foundational approach. In: Becker, J., Delfmann, P. (eds.) Reference Modeling, pp. 59–77. Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. OMG Object Management Group: Documents associated with uml version 2 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Grökovic, G., Parreiras, F., Gaevic, D.: Modeling and validation of business process families. Inf. Syst. 38(5), 709–726 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Jablonski, S., Bussler, C.: Workflow Management: Modeling Concepts, Architecture and Implementation. International Thomson Computer Press, London (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kang, K.C., Cohen, S.G., Hess, J.A., Novak, W.E., Peterson, A.S.: Feature-oriented domain analysis (FODA): feasibility study. Technical report, SEI (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  10. La Rosa, M., Dumas, M., Hofstede, A., Mendling, J.: Configurable multi-perspective business process models. Inf. Syst. 36(2), 313–340 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ladeira, S., Penteado, R., Braga, R., Cagnin, M.I.: Business modelling reuse based on views: a case study. In: 22nd Brazilian Symposium on Software Engineering, Brazil, pp. 140–155 (2008). (In Portuguese)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Laudon, K., Laudon, J.: Essentials of Management Information Systems, 10th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Pohl, K., Bockle, G., van der Linden, F.J.: Software Product Line Engineering: Foundations, Principles and Techniques, 1st edn. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. Rolland, C., Nurcan, S.: Business process lines to deal with the variability. In: 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 1–10 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Schnieders, A., Puhlmann, F.: Variability mechanisms in e-business process families. In: International Conference on Business Information Systems, Austria, pp. 583–601 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wohlin, C., Runeson, P., Hst, M., Ohlsson, M., Regnell, B., Wessln, A.: Experimentation in Software Engineering. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Geraldo Landre .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Landre, G., Palma, E., Paiva, D.M., Nakagawa, E.Y., Cagnin, M.I. (2015). vrBPMN* and FM: An Approach to Model Business Process Line. In: Fournier, F., Mendling, J. (eds) Business Process Management Workshops. BPM 2014. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 202. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15895-2_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15895-2_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-15894-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-15895-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics