Abstract
The aim of this paper is to reveal Web 2.0 as a meaningful heritage interpretative technique that could be employed in heritage interpretation to improve visitor’s experience through the constructivist learning opportunities. Constructivist learning theories involve learner in a participatory meaning-making process to foster deep learning and understanding which is enhanced by Web 2.0 functions. Interpretation is an educational process that aims to reveal meanings and values that lie behind the facts and objects.
Interpretation that does not enables interaction among visitor and resource is sterile. As a result there is an interrelation between interpretation and constructivist learning which highlights the value of visitor’s participation in the interpretational activities. Web 2.0 is intended to encourage active participation, cooperation and exchange of knowledge and ideas between users. This research presents for functions of Web 2.0 that enhance heritage interpretation: Interaction among users, Content creation and interaction with it, social tagging and Recreation.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Affleck, J., & Kvan, T. (2008). A virtual community as a context for discursive interpretation: A role in cultural heritage engagement. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 14(3), 268–280.
Carter, J. (1997). A sense of a place. An interpretative planning handbook. UK: Tourism and Environment Initiative.
Chung, Y. J., & Buhalis, D. (2008). Information needs in online social networks. Information Technology & Tourism, 10(4), 267–281 (15).
Cohen, E. (1988). Authenticity and commoditization in tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 15, 371–386.
Dholakia, M. U., Bagozzi, P. R., & Pearo, K. L. (2004). A social influence model of consumer participation in network-and small-group-based virtual communities. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 21(3), 241–263.
Emberson, C., & Veverka, J. A. What is interpretation planning? Retrieved from www.heritaginterp.com
Fosnot, C. T., & Perry, R. S. (1996). Constructivism: A psychological theory of learning. Retrieved from http://rsperry.com/fosnotandperry.pdf. In Fosnot, C. T. (2013). Constructivism: Theory, perspectives, and practice (2nd ed.). Teachers College Press.
Freeman, C. G. (2010). Photosharing on Flickr: Intangible heritage and emergent publics. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 16(4–5), 352–368.
Goulding, C. (2000). The commodification of the past, postmodern pastiche and the search for authentic experiences at contemporary heritage attractions. European Journal of Marketing, 34(7), 835–853.
Hein, E. G. (2005). Learning in the museum. Routledge.
Howard, P. (2006). Valediction and reflection. International Heritage Studies, 12(6), 483–488.
Kalfatovic, M., Kapsalis, E., Spiess, K., Van Camp, A., & Edson, M. (2008). Smithsonian Team Flickr: A library, archives and museums collaboration in Web 2.0 space. Archival Science, 8(4), 267–277.
Kriesel, W., Gee, K., & Dickmann, F. (2004). The potential of internet-based techniques for heritage interpretation. In Archaeology and intelligent cultural heritage, pp. 67–74.
Liburd, J. J., & Christensen, I. M. F. (2013). Using web 2.0 in higher tourism education. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education, 12(1), 99–108.
McLoughlin, C., & Lee, J. W. M. (2007). Social software and participatory learning: Pedagogical choices with technology affordances in the Web 2.0 era. Retrieved from http://pdf.thepdfportal.com/PDFFiles/48194.pdf
McMillan, W. D. (1996). Sense of community. Journal of Community Psychology, 24(4), 315–325.
Moscardo, G. (1996). Mindful visitors. Heritage and tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 23(2), 376–397.
Moscaro, G. (1998), Interpretation and Sustainable Tourism: Functions, examples and principles, The Journal of Tourism Studies, 9(1), 2–13.
Moscardo, G., & Ballantyne, M. (2008). Interpretation and attractions. In A. Fyall, B. Garrod, A. Leask, & S. Wanhill (Eds.), Managing visitors attraction: New directions (pp. 237–252). Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
Nielsen, C. N., & Liburd, J. J. (2010). Geographical information and landscape history in tourism communication in the age of Web 2.0. The case of the Salt River Bay National Park in St. Croix of the U.S. Virgin Islands. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 25(3–4), 282–298.
Nuryanti, W. (1996). Heritage and postmodern tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 23(2), 249–260.
Ott, M., & Pozzi, F. (2011). Towards a new era for cultural heritage education: Discussing the role of ICT. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(4), 1365–1371.
Sigala, M. (2005). A learning assessment of online interpretation practices: From Museum supply chains to experience ecologies. In Information and communication technologies in tourism, pp. 67–78.
Teather, L., & Wilhelm, K. (1999). “Web musing”: Evaluating museums on the web from learning theory to methodology. Museums and the Web. Retrieved from www.archimuse.com
Tilden, F. (1977). Interpreting our heritage. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
Tuan, Y. (1977). Space and place: The perspective of experience. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press. In Timothy (1996).
Veverka, J. A. (2000). Interpretive planning for the next millennium—The “product of the product”—“Outcome based planning” and the “experience economy”. Legacy, 11(3).
Voase, R. (2002). Rediscovering the imagination: Investigating active and passive visitor experience in the 21st century. International Journal of Tourism Research, 4(5), 391–399.
Wang, Y., Yu, Q., & Fesenmaier, R. D. (2002). Defining the virtual tourist community: Implications for tourism marketing. Tourism Management, 23(4), 407–417.
Woo, Y., & Reeves, T. C. (2007). Meaningful interaction in web-based learning: A social constructivist interpretation. The Internet and Higher Education, 10(1), 15–25.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Eirini, V. (2015). Web 2.0 Enhancing Role in Heritage Interpretation Based on Constructivist Learning Theories. In: Katsoni, V. (eds) Cultural Tourism in a Digital Era. Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15859-4_23
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15859-4_23
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-15858-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-15859-4
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsBusiness and Management (R0)