Skip to main content

Web 2.0 Enhancing Role in Heritage Interpretation Based on Constructivist Learning Theories

  • Conference paper
Cultural Tourism in a Digital Era

Part of the book series: Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics ((SPBE))

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to reveal Web 2.0 as a meaningful heritage interpretative technique that could be employed in heritage interpretation to improve visitor’s experience through the constructivist learning opportunities. Constructivist learning theories involve learner in a participatory meaning-making process to foster deep learning and understanding which is enhanced by Web 2.0 functions. Interpretation is an educational process that aims to reveal meanings and values that lie behind the facts and objects.

Interpretation that does not enables interaction among visitor and resource is sterile. As a result there is an interrelation between interpretation and constructivist learning which highlights the value of visitor’s participation in the interpretational activities. Web 2.0 is intended to encourage active participation, cooperation and exchange of knowledge and ideas between users. This research presents for functions of Web 2.0 that enhance heritage interpretation: Interaction among users, Content creation and interaction with it, social tagging and Recreation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Affleck, J., & Kvan, T. (2008). A virtual community as a context for discursive interpretation: A role in cultural heritage engagement. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 14(3), 268–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, J. (1997). A sense of a place. An interpretative planning handbook. UK: Tourism and Environment Initiative.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chung, Y. J., & Buhalis, D. (2008). Information needs in online social networks. Information Technology & Tourism, 10(4), 267–281 (15).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, E. (1988). Authenticity and commoditization in tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 15, 371–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dholakia, M. U., Bagozzi, P. R., & Pearo, K. L. (2004). A social influence model of consumer participation in network-and small-group-based virtual communities. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 21(3), 241–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emberson, C., & Veverka, J. A. What is interpretation planning? Retrieved from www.heritaginterp.com

  • Fosnot, C. T., & Perry, R. S. (1996). Constructivism: A psychological theory of learning. Retrieved from http://rsperry.com/fosnotandperry.pdf. In Fosnot, C. T. (2013). Constructivism: Theory, perspectives, and practice (2nd ed.). Teachers College Press.

  • Freeman, C. G. (2010). Photosharing on Flickr: Intangible heritage and emergent publics. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 16(4–5), 352–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goulding, C. (2000). The commodification of the past, postmodern pastiche and the search for authentic experiences at contemporary heritage attractions. European Journal of Marketing, 34(7), 835–853.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hein, E. G. (2005). Learning in the museum. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, P. (2006). Valediction and reflection. International Heritage Studies, 12(6), 483–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalfatovic, M., Kapsalis, E., Spiess, K., Van Camp, A., & Edson, M. (2008). Smithsonian Team Flickr: A library, archives and museums collaboration in Web 2.0 space. Archival Science, 8(4), 267–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kriesel, W., Gee, K., & Dickmann, F. (2004). The potential of internet-based techniques for heritage interpretation. In Archaeology and intelligent cultural heritage, pp. 67–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liburd, J. J., & Christensen, I. M. F. (2013). Using web 2.0 in higher tourism education. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education, 12(1), 99–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLoughlin, C., & Lee, J. W. M. (2007). Social software and participatory learning: Pedagogical choices with technology affordances in the Web 2.0 era. Retrieved from http://pdf.thepdfportal.com/PDFFiles/48194.pdf

  • McMillan, W. D. (1996). Sense of community. Journal of Community Psychology, 24(4), 315–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moscardo, G. (1996). Mindful visitors. Heritage and tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 23(2), 376–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moscaro, G. (1998), Interpretation and Sustainable Tourism: Functions, examples and principles, The Journal of Tourism Studies, 9(1), 2–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moscardo, G., & Ballantyne, M. (2008). Interpretation and attractions. In A. Fyall, B. Garrod, A. Leask, & S. Wanhill (Eds.), Managing visitors attraction: New directions (pp. 237–252). Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, C. N., & Liburd, J. J. (2010). Geographical information and landscape history in tourism communication in the age of Web 2.0. The case of the Salt River Bay National Park in St. Croix of the U.S. Virgin Islands. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 25(3–4), 282–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nuryanti, W. (1996). Heritage and postmodern tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 23(2), 249–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ott, M., & Pozzi, F. (2011). Towards a new era for cultural heritage education: Discussing the role of ICT. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(4), 1365–1371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sigala, M. (2005). A learning assessment of online interpretation practices: From Museum supply chains to experience ecologies. In Information and communication technologies in tourism, pp. 67–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teather, L., & Wilhelm, K. (1999). “Web musing”: Evaluating museums on the web from learning theory to methodology. Museums and the Web. Retrieved from www.archimuse.com

  • Tilden, F. (1977). Interpreting our heritage. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuan, Y. (1977). Space and place: The perspective of experience. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press. In Timothy (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • Veverka, J. A. (2000). Interpretive planning for the next millennium—The “product of the product”—“Outcome based planning” and the “experience economy”. Legacy, 11(3).

    Google Scholar 

  • Voase, R. (2002). Rediscovering the imagination: Investigating active and passive visitor experience in the 21st century. International Journal of Tourism Research, 4(5), 391–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y., Yu, Q., & Fesenmaier, R. D. (2002). Defining the virtual tourist community: Implications for tourism marketing. Tourism Management, 23(4), 407–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woo, Y., & Reeves, T. C. (2007). Meaningful interaction in web-based learning: A social constructivist interpretation. The Internet and Higher Education, 10(1), 15–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vlassi Eirini .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Eirini, V. (2015). Web 2.0 Enhancing Role in Heritage Interpretation Based on Constructivist Learning Theories. In: Katsoni, V. (eds) Cultural Tourism in a Digital Era. Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15859-4_23

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics