Skip to main content

Simple Methods to Measure the Additive Error and Integral Nonlinearity of Precision Thermometric Bridges

  • Conference paper
Progress in Automation, Robotics and Measuring Techniques

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 352))

Abstract

Determination of the accuracy of AC bridges with the high precision adjustable transformer voltage dividers based on the strongly magnetic coupling coils is referred in this paper. Metrological model of the temperature measurements by resistive sensors connected to these bridges is presented. The additive, multiplicative and linearity components of error in temperature measurement are considered. Method for determining the zero of the bridge error is developed. It is based on the non standard connection mode of the equipotential pairs of current and voltage terminals of standard resistance to the bridge. It is estimated that up to 1 MΩ of this resistance, the effective resistance obtained on the bridge input is less than 10− 10 Ω. Four-terminal standard resistors of 0.1 Ω up to 1 MΩ are used in experiments to find bridge zero readings. Results indicate that the additive error of the tested precision bridge is about 0.5 LSB and is independent from the nominal standard resistance value. The conditions under which in temperature measurements remains only the linearity bridge error are formulated. Proposed is the unconventional method of measure and estimating the bridge nonlinearity named as dichotomy method. It applies algorithm based on the division of the measurement range and then obtained subsequent intervals always in half. Graphical interpretation and the analytical expression for the nonlinearity error are given. Sets of paired four terminal reference standard resistors are proposed for use in control. The resistance of each of them separately and of the given serial physical connection of them both has to be measured by tested bridge. The reasons affecting the accuracy of the physical realization of resistance summation is discussed. By calculations and experimental verification is find that in measurements by dichotomy method the bridge linearity error of 0.1 ppm or less can be discovered. Conclusions and final remarks are included. Both methods are simply and can be easily implemented in any metrology lab and be used also in automatic calibrators.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. TC-EM Roadmap: Innovative calibration means in electricity/magnetism, http://www.euramet.org/index.php?id=roadmaps

  2. Palafox, L.: PTB Develop Quantum-Based Impedance Bridges. Measure 7(1), 4 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Machin, G., et al.: A European roadmap for thermometry, EURAMET TCT (2012), http://www.euramet.org/index.php?id=roadmaps

  4. Joung, W., Gam, K.S., Yang, I., Kim, Y.-G.: Uncertainty assessment of resistance thermometry bridges. In: XX IMEKO World Congress, September 9-14, Busan, Republic of Korea (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Walker, R.: Automatic linearity calibration in a resistance thermometry bridge. TEMPMEKO & ISHM Book of Abstracts, 217 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Quinn, T.: Temperature Scales from the early days of thermometry to the 21st century IMEKO-TC12-2004-PL-001.pdf (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Uncertainties in the realization of the SPRT Subranges of the ITS-90, CCT-WG3 on Uncertainties in Contact Thermometry, CCT/08-19/rev (July 10, 2009), www.bipm.org/cc/CCT/./24/D19_rev_WG3_Doc_rev_10July2009.pdf

  8. Avramov, S., Oldham, N., Gammon, R.: Inductive voltage divider calibration for a NASA flight experiment. In: NCSL Workshop & Symposium, Session 3C, pp. 225–232 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  9. White, D.R.: A method for calibrating resistance thermometry. In: Torino, P., Marcarino, L., Bella, T. (eds.), pp. 129–134 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  10. White, D.R., Jones, K., Williams, J.M., Ramsey, I.E.: A simple resistance network for calibrating resistance bridges. IEEE Trans. Instr. Meas 46(5), 1068–1074 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Riley, J.C.: The accuracy of series and parallel connections of four-terminal resistors. IEEE Trans. of Instrumentation and Measurement 16(3), 258–268 (1967)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Awan, S., Kibble, B., Schurr, J.: Coaxial Electrical Circuits for Interference-free Measurements, vol. 350, p. 321. The Institution of Engineering and Technology, London (2011)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. Mikhal, A.A., Warsza, Z.L.: Simply calibration methods of the precision AC thermometric bridges (2) Measurement of integral nonlinearity by the dichotomy method. Pomiary Automatyka Robotyka 10, 130–137 (2013) (in Polish)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mikhal, A.A., Meleshchuk, D.V., Warsza, Z.L.: Application of double-shielding technique in thermometric AC bridges. Pomiary Automatyka Kontrola (Measurement Automation Monitoring) 11 (2014) (in Polish)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Mikhal, A.A., Warsza, Z.L. (2015). Simple Methods to Measure the Additive Error and Integral Nonlinearity of Precision Thermometric Bridges. In: Szewczyk, R., Zieliński, C., Kaliczyńska, M. (eds) Progress in Automation, Robotics and Measuring Techniques. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 352. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15835-8_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15835-8_18

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-15834-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-15835-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics