Advertisement

Innovation for Failure Detection and Correction in Safety-Related Systems Which Based on a New Estimator

  • Ossmane KriniEmail author
  • Jamal Krini
  • Abderrahim Krini
  • Josef Börcsök
Chapter
  • 722 Downloads
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 343)

Abstract

This scientific work presents a new method allowing to make a realistic prediction about reliability of safety related systems. The main feature of this method enables the prediction of an estimate of the remaining critical number of faults in systems. Stochastic play a very important role in safety technology. With the help of it, safety systems may be released reliably after an assessment. With the help of the probability theory meaningful statements are achieved and based on them, realistic forecasts may be given. However, in order that reliable forecasts can be conducted, new approaches in thinking need to be developed. The algorithm can provide an even more reliable prognosis than the conventional methods. Furthermore, the new method describes two processes for critical failures (detection and correction process). This contribution serves to give a short synopsis about the actual problem of the probabilistic safety technology on the base of stochastic. In that, the test methods, however, plays the most important role as the test results are source vectors for probabilistic models. However, this article tries to describe a suitable, innovative method that will correctly estimate the safety parameters.

Keywords

Stochastic Mathematical models Safety Probability  Reliability  Failure/Error Matrix-calculations  

References

  1. 1.
    Börcsök, J.: Functional Safety Computer Architecture Part 1 and Part 2. Lecture Notes. University of Kassel, Kassel (2001)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Börcsök, J.: Functional Safety Systems. Hüthig, Heidelberg (2004)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    IEC 61508, International Standard: 61508 Functional Safety of Electrical Electronic Programmable Electronic Safety Related Systems Part 1–Part 7. International Electro Technical Commission, Geneva (1999–2000)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Robert, C.P., Casella, G.: Monte Carlo, Statistical Methods. Springer, Berlin (1999)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Storey, N.: Safety Critical Computer Systems. Addison Wesley, Harlow (1996)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lewis, E.E.: Introduction to Reliability Engineering, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York (1996)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Velten-Philipp, W., Houtermans, M.J.M.: The Effect of Diagnostic and Periodic Testing on the Reliability of Safety Systems. TÜV, Köln (2006)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Health & Safety Executive (HSE) UK, Programmable Electronic Systems in Safety-Related Applications, Part I. HM Stationery Office, London (1995)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Börcsök, J., Holub, P., Schwarz, M.H., Dang Pham, N.T.: Determine PFD-Values for Safety Related Systems Overview. ESREL, Stavanger (2007)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Goble, W.M.: Safety of Programmable Electronic Systems—Critical Issues, Diagnostic and Common Cause Strength. Proceedings of the IchemE Symposium. Institution of Chemical Engineers, Rugby (1995)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ossmane Krini
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jamal Krini
    • 1
  • Abderrahim Krini
    • 1
  • Josef Börcsök
    • 1
  1. 1.Computer Architecture and System ProgrammingUniversity of KasselKasselGermany

Personalised recommendations