Abstract
Social scientists undertaking studies in developing countries focus on ‘trial communities’: networks of funders, institutions, researchers, clinical staff, fieldworkers, and study participants. Whereas bioethicists consider universal ethical requirements, social scientists examine ethical practices in light of concerns and interests of parties involved in medical research. In conditions of poverty, high morbidity and weak public health services, subjects are heavily induced by the prospect of high quality care that researchers seem to offer. Studies of health research undertaken by well-established institutions in Africa show that parents eagerly have their children ‘join’ such projects. They assess benefits and risks less in research terms and more through overall trust in care provided previously by such institutions in the community. Bioethics should go beyond concern with protecting individual subjects from research risks and should view clinical care and research functions as indistinguishable for many who seek sustained support for the children’s health.
First published April 19, 2014 as 10.1136/archdischild-2013-304852. Republished with permission.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Hoeyer K, Dahlager L, Lynöe N. Conflicting notions of research ethics: the mutually challenging traditions of social scientists and medical researchers. Soc Sci Med. 2005;61:1741–9.
Adams V. Evidence based global public health: subjects, profits, erasures. In: Biehl J, Petryna A, editors. When people come first: critical studies in global health. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2013. p. 54–90.
Khairun NB, Aripin N, Sammons HM, Choonara I. Published pediatric randomized drug trials in developing countries, 1996–2002. Paediatr Drugs. 2010;12:99–103.
Emanuel EJ, Wendler D, Killen J, Grady C. What makes clinical research in developing countries ethical? the benchmarks of ethical research. J Infect Dis. 2004;189:930–7.
Farmer P. The New malaise: medical ethics and social rights in the global era. In: Pathologies of power. Berkeley: University of California Press; 2003.
Lang TA, Gould J, Seidlein L, Lusingu JP, Mshamu S, Ismael S, et al. Approaching the community about screening children for a multicentre malaria vaccine trial. Int Health. 2012;4:47–54.
Christopher JB, May AL, Lewin S, Ross DA. Thirty years after Alma-Ata: a systematic review of he impact of community health workers delivering curative interventions against malaria, pneumonia and diarrhoea on child mortality and morbidity in sub-Saharan Africa. Hum Resour Health. 2011;9:27.
Molyneux S, Geissler PW. Ethics and the ethnography of medical research in Africa. Soc Sci Med. 2008;67:685–95.
Kelly A, Geissler W. Introduction: the value of transnational medical research. J Cult Econ. 2011;4:3–10.
Molyneux S, Giessler PW, et al. Field workers at the interface. Deve World Bioeth. 2013; 13(1):2–4.
Geissler PW, Molyneux CS, editors. Evidence, ethos and experiment: the anthropology and history of medical research in Africa. Oxford: Berghahn; 2011.
Geissler PW. Studying trial communities: anthropological and historical inquiries into ethos, politics and economy of medical research in Africa. In: Geissler PW, Molyneux C, editors. Evidence, ethos and experiment: the anthropology and history of medical research in Africa. Oxford: Berghahn; 2011. p. 1–28.
Geissler PW. ‘Transport to where?’ Reflections on the problem of value and time àpropos an awkward practice in medical research. J Cult Econ. 2011;4:45–64.
Fairhead J, Leach M, Small M. Public engagement with science? local understandings of a vaccine trial in the Gambia. J Biosoc Sci. 2006;38:103–16.
Whyte SR. Writing knowledge and acknowledgement: possibilities in medical research. In: Geissler PW, Molyneux CS, editors. Evidence, ethos and experiment: the anthropology and history of medical research in Africa. Oxford: Berghahn; 2011. p. 29–56.
Marsh V, Kamuya D, Rowa Y, Gikonyo C, Molyneux S. Beginning community engagement at a busy biomedical research programme: experiences from the KEMRI CGMRC-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, Kenya. Soc Sci Med. 2008;67:721–33.
Molyneux CS, Peshu N, Marsh K. Trust and informed consent: insights from community members on the Kenyan coast. Soc Sci Med. 2005;61:1463–73.
Petryna A. When experiments travel: clinical trials and the global search for human subjects. Princeton University Press: Princeton; 2009.
Nama N, Swartz L. Ethical and social dilemmas in community-based controlled trials in situations of poverty: a view from a South African project. J Community Appl Soc Psychol. 2002;12:286–97.
Leach M, Fairhead J. Being ‘with the Medical Research Council’: infant care and the social meanings of cohort membership in Gambia’s plural therapeutic landscapes. In: Geissler PW, Molyneux CS, editors. Evidence, ethos and experiment: the anthropology and history of medical research in Africa. Oxford: Berghahn; 2011. p. 77–98.
Gikonyo C, Bejon P, Marsh V, Molyneux S. Taking social relationships seriously: lessons learned from the informed consent practices of a vaccine trial on the Kenyan Coast. Soc Sci Med. 2008;67:708–20.
Newton S, Doku V, Geissler W, Asante K, Cousens S. Drawing blood from young children: lessons learned from a trial in Ghana. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2009;103:497–9.
Geissler PW. ‘Kachinja are coming!’: encounters around medical research work in a Kenyan village. Africa. 2005;75:173–202.
Gikonyo C, Kamuya D, Mbete B, Njuguna P, Olotu A, Bejon P, et al. Feedback of research findings for vaccine trials: experiences from two malaria vaccine trials involving healthy children on the Kenyan coast. Dev World Bioeth. 2013;13:48–56.
Emanuel EJ, Currie XE, Herman A, Project Phidisa, et al. Undue inducement in clinical research in developing countries? Is it a worry? Lancet. 2005;366(9482):336–40.
Molyneux CS, Wassenaar DR, Peshu N, Marsh K. ‘Even if they ask you to stand by a tree all day, you will have to do it (laughter)…!’: Community voices on the notion and practice of informed consent for biomedical research in developing countries. Soc Sci Med. 2005;61:443–54.
Acknowledgements
The author acknowledges financial and collegial support from the project ‘Quality Medicine Use for Children in Uganda’ funded by the Danish Consultative Committee for Development Research. The paper is inspired by the 2005 conference in Kilifi, Kenya, on ‘Studying Trial Communities’ and the ensuing publications. I have no competing interests to declare.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Reynolds Whyte, S. (2015). Therapeutic Research in Low-Income Countries: Studying Trial Communities. In: MacLeod, S., Hill, S., Koren, G., Rane, A. (eds) Optimizing Treatment for Children in the Developing World. Adis, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15750-4_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15750-4_5
Publisher Name: Adis, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-15749-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-15750-4
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)