Skip to main content

Abstract

The advent of ultrasound (US) has transformed our understanding of spondyloarthritis in general and ankylosing spondylitis in particular as it facilitates the move towards unifying biomechanical basis for these arthropathies that is based on the enthesis organ concept. US has also proven to be extremely useful for the diagnosis of inflammatory superficial soft tissue, differentiating it from other metabolic or mechanical enthesopathies as well as monitoring the response to management. Both US and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) also show considerable impact for the diagnostic evaluation of appendicular joint involvement in early ankylosing spondylitis. Further improvement in imaging technology for these sites could also greatly improve our understanding of the disease.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Smolen J, Braun J, Dougados M, et al. Treating spondyloarthritis including, ankylosing spon- dylitis and psoriatic arthritis, to target: recommendations of an international task force. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014 Jan;73(1):6-16.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Feldtkeller E, Khan MA, van der Heijde D, van der Linden S, Braun J. Age at disease onset and diagnosis delay in HLA-B27 negative vs. positive patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Rheumatol Int. 2003;23:61–6.

    Google Scholar 

  3. van Tubergen A, Heuft-Dorenbosch L, Schulpen G, et al. Radiographic assessment of sacroiliitis by radiologists and rheumatologists: does training improve quality? Ann Rheum Dis. 2003;62:519–25.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Falcao S, De Miguel E, Castillo-Gallego C et al. Achilles enthesis ultrasound: the importance of the bursa in spondyloarthritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2013;31:422–7.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Naredo E, Batlle-Gualda E, Garciavivar M, et al. Power doppler ultrasonography assessment of entheses in spondyloarthropathies: response to therapy of entheseal abnormalities. J Rheumatol. 2010;37:2110–7.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Benjamin M, McGonagle D. The enthesis organ concept and its relevance to the spondyloarthropathies. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2009;649:57–70.

    Google Scholar 

  7. McGonagle D, Wakefield R, Tan A, et al. Distinct topography of erosion and new bone formation in achilles tendon enthesitis: implications for understanding the link between inflammation and bone formation in spondyloarthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;58(9):2694–9.

    Google Scholar 

  8. McGonagle D, Marzo-Ortega H, O’Connor P, et al. Histological assessment of the early enthesitis lesion in spondyloarthropathy. Ann Rheum Dis. 2002;61:534–7.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Benjamin M, McGonagle D. The anatomical basis for disease localisation in seronegative spondyloarthropathy at entheses and related sites. J Anat. 2001;199:503–26.

    Google Scholar 

  10. McGonagle D, Marzo-Ortega H, Benjamin M, Emery P. Report on the second International enthesitis workshop. Arthritis Rheum. 2003;48:896–905.

    Google Scholar 

  11. McGonagle D, Lories RJ, Tan AL, Benjamin M. The concept of a “synovio-entheseal complex” and its implications for understanding joint inflammation and damage in psoriatic arthritis and beyond. Arthritis Rheum. 2007;56:2482–91.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gisondi P, Tinazzi I, El-Dalati G, et al. Lower limb enthesopathy in patients with psoriasis without clinical signs of arthropathy: a hospital based case-control study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2008;67:26–30.

    Google Scholar 

  13. El Miedany Y. Musculoskeletal US: taking the management of psoriatic arthritis to a new horizon. Curr Rheumatol Rev. 2012;8:12–9.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Falsetti P, Acciai C, Lenzi L, et al. Ultrasound of enthesopathy in rheumatic diseases. Mod Rheumatol. 2009;19:103–13.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Grassi W, Filippucci E, Farina A, Cervini C. Sonographic imaging of tendons. Arthritis Rheum. 2000;43:969–76.

    Google Scholar 

  16. De Vlam K, Mielant H, Veyes EM. Association between ankylosing spondylitis and diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis: reality or fiction? Clin Exp Rheumatol. 1996;14:5–11.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Wakefiled RJ, Balint PV, Szkudlarek M, et al. OMERACT 7 special interest group. Musculoskeletal ultrasound including definitions for ultrasonographic pathology. J Rheumatol. 2005;32:2485–7.

    Google Scholar 

  18. D’ Agostino MA, Palazzi C, Olivier I. Entheseal involvement. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2009;27(4 Suppl. 55):S50–5.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Balint PV, Kane D, Wilson H, McInnes IB, Sturrock RD. Ultrasonography of entheseal insertions in the lower limb in spondyloarthropathy. Ann Rheum Dis. 2002;61:905–10.

    Google Scholar 

  20. D’Agostino MA, Said-Nahal R, Hacquard-Bouder C, et al. Assessment of peripheral enthesitis in the spondylarthropathies by ultrasonography combined with power doppler: a cross-sectional study. Arthritis Rheum. 2003;48:523–33.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Alcalde M, Acebes JC, Cruz M, et al. A sonographic enthesitic index of lower limbs is a valuable tool in the assessment of ankylosing spondylitis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2007;66:1015–9.

    Google Scholar 

  22. De Miguel E, Cobo T, Munoz-Fernandez S, et al. Validity of enthesis ultrasound assessment in spondyloarthropathy. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009;68:169–74.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Spadaro A, Iagnocco A, Perrotta F, et al. Clinical and ultrasonography assessment of peripheral enthesitis in ankylosing spondylitis. Rheumatology. 2011;50:2080–6.

    Google Scholar 

  24. D’Agostino M. Ultrasound imaging in spondyloarthropathies. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2010;24:693–700.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Balint P, Kane D, Wilson H, et al. Ultrasonography of entheseal insertions in the lower limb in spondyloarthropathy. Ann Rheum Dis. 2002;61:905–10.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Borman P, Koparal S, Babaoglu S, et al. Ultrasound detection of entheseal insertions in the foot of patients with spondyloarthropathy. Clin Rheumatol. 2006;25:373–7.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Falsetti P, Frediani B, Filippou G, et al. Enthesitis of proximal insertion of the deltoid in the course of seronegative spondyloarthritis. An atypical enthesitis that can mime impingement syndrome. Scand J Rheumatol. 2002;31:158–62.

    Google Scholar 

  28. El Miedany Y, El Gaafary M, Youssef S, et al. Tailored approach to early psoriatic arthritis patients: clinical and ultrasonographic predictors for structural joint damage. Clin Rheumatol. 2015 Feb;34(2):307-13.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Kiris A, Kaya A, Ozgocmen S, et al. Assessment of enthesitis in ankylosing spondylitis by power doppler ultrasonography. Skeletal Radiol. 2006;35:522–8.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Riente L, Carli L, Delle Sedie A. Ultrasound imaging in psoriatic arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2014;32(Suppl. 80):S26–33.

    Google Scholar 

  31. El Miedany Y, El Gaafary M, Palmer D. Imaging as an outcome measure in early inflammatory arthritis: monitoring disease activity and patients’ response to therapy using ultrasonography. Arthritis Rheum. 2011;63(10):S319.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Wiell C, Szkudlarek M, Hasselquist M, et al. Ultrasonography, magnetic resonance imaging, radiography, and clinical assessment of inflammatory and destructive changes in fingers and toes of patients with psoriatic arthritis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2007;9–14:R119.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Aydin S, Omer K, Filippucci E, et al. Monitoring achilles enthesitis in ankylosing spondylitis during TNF-α antagonist therapy: an ultrasound study. Rheumatology. 2010;49:578–82.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Huang Z, Cao J, Lt T, et al. Efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided local injections of etanercept into entheses of ankylosing spondylitis patients with refractory achilles enthesitis. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2011;29:642–9.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Tan L, McGonagle D. Imaging of seronegative spondyloarthritis. Best Prac Res Clin Rheumatol. 2008;22(6):1045–59.

    Google Scholar 

  36. El Miedany Y. Spondyloarthritis with psoriasis: new insights. J Arthritis. 2012;1:106. doi:10.4172/2167-7921.1000106.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Unlü E, Pamuk ON, Cakir N. Color and duplex doppler sonography to detect sacroiliitis and spinal inflammation in ankylosing spondylitis. Can this method reveal response to anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy? J Rheumatol. 2007;34(1):110–6.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Spadaro A, Iagnocco A, Baccano G, et al. Sonographic-detected joint effusion compared with physical examination in the assessment of sacroiliac joints in spondyloarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009;68:1559–63.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Bandinelli F, Melchiorre D, Scazzariello F, et al. Clinical and radiological evaluation of sacroiliac joints compared with ultrasound examination in early spondyloarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011;70(Suppl. 3):374.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Mohammadi A, Ghasemi-Rad M, Aghdashi M, et al. Evaluation of disease activity in ankylosing spondylitis; diagnostic value of color doppler ultrasonography. Skeletal Radiol. 2013;42:219–24.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Hu Y, Zhu J, Xue Q, Wang N, Hu B. Scanning of the sacroiliac joint and enthuses by color Doppler Ankylosing Spondylitis ultrasonography in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. J Rheumatol. 2011;38:1651–5.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Jiang Y, Chen L, Zhu J, et al. Power doppler ultrasonography in the evaluation of infliximab treatment for sacroiliitis in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Rheumatol Int. 2013;33:2025–9.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Klauser A, Halpern EJ, Frauscher F, et al. Inflammatory low back pain: high negative predictive value of contrast-enhanced color Doppler ultrasound in the detection of inflamed sacroiliac joints. Arthritis Rheum. 2005;53(3):440–4.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Hartung W, Ross CJ, Straub R, et al. Ultrasound-guided sacroiliac joint injection in patients with established sacroiliitis: precise IA injection verified by MRI scanning does not predict clinical outcome. Rheumatology. 2010;49:1479–82.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Klauser A, De Zordo T, Feuchtner G, et al. Feasibility of ultrasound-guided sacroiliac joint injection considering sonoanatomic landmarks at two different levels in cadavers and patients. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;59:1618–24.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Warner MB, Cotton AM, Stokes MJ. Comparison of curvilinear and linear ultrasound imaging probes for measuring cross-sectional area and linear dimensions. J Med Eng Technol. 2008;32:498–504.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Chen CP, Wong AM, Hsu CC, et al. Ultrasound as a screening tool for proceeding with caudal epidural injections. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;91:358–63.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Pekkafahli MZ, Kiralp MZ, Basekim CC, et al. Sacroiliac joint injections performed with sonographic guidance. J Ultrasound Med. 2003;22:553–9.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Chen CP, Lew HL, Tsai WC, et al. Ultrasound-guided injection techniques for the low back and hip joint. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2011;90:860–7.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Migliore A, Bizzi E, Massafra U, et al. A new technical contribution for ultrasound guided injections of sacroiliac joints. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2010;14:465–9.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Harmon D, O’Sullivan M. Ultrasound guided sacroiliac joint injection technique. Pain Physician. 2008;11:543–7.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Ooi CC, Malliaras P, Schneider ME, Connell DA. Soft, hard, or just right? Applications and limitations of axial-strain sonoelastography and shear-wave elastography in the assessment of tendon injuries. Skeletal Radiol. 2014;43(1):1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Turan A, Tufan A, Mercan R, et al. Real-time sonoelastography of Achilles tendon in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Skeletal Radiol. 2013;42:1113–8.

    Google Scholar 

  54. De Zordo T, Chhem R, Smekal V, et al. Real-time sonoelastography: findings in patients with symptomatic Achilles tendons and comparison to healthy volunteers. Ultraschall Med. 2010;31:394–400.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Wu C, Chang K, Mio S, et al. Sonoelastography of the planter fascia. Radiology. 2011;259(2):502–7.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marina Backhaus MD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Backhaus, M., Miedany, Y. (2015). Ankylosing Spondylitis. In: El Miedany, Y. (eds) Musculoskeletal Ultrasonography in Rheumatic Diseases. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15723-8_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15723-8_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-15722-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-15723-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics