Skip to main content

Pitfalls in Musculoskeletal Ultrasound

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Musculoskeletal Ultrasonography in Rheumatic Diseases

Abstract

Pitfalls are generally acknowledged as difficulties or traps. They are frequently altering the process of medical diagnosis, especially when imaging procedures are involved. Ultrasonography is the most “operator dependent” among imaging procedures. The result of an ultrasound examination is mainly an image interpretation. Pitfalls may significantly alter both the acquisition and the interpretation of ultrasound images.

Artifacts are responsible for most of the acquisition pitfalls, leading to both false-positive and false-negative conclusions. They are in fact artificially created echoes, without a real correspondent in the examined tissue. This chapter addresses specific ultrasound artifacts. Some of them like anisotropy, attenuation, or enhancement through transmission are encountered in almost every ultrasound examination. Others are more uncommon, but increasing their awareness is also mandatory for accurately performing the procedure. Artifacts are pitfalls specifically connected to the technical part of ultrasonography and are consequences of physics principles applied to the human body.

Apart from artifacts, ultrasound examination may be altered by improper use/damage of the ultrasound machine involved in the investigation or by human errors: of the performing practitioner or of the examined patients. Pitfalls may also be generated by anatomical variants, often misleading during diagnosis process. New areas of musculoskeletal ultrasound application such as children pathology or thoracic evaluation could be sources of pitfalls for an unexperienced practitioner. The chapter contains a short description of the most important pitfalls of musculoskeletal ultrasound evaluation and, more important, useful tips to surmount them when possible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Oxford Dictionary of English 3rd edition, Online version 2013, http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/artefact.

  2. Kane D, Grassi W, Sturrock R, Balint PV. A brief history of musculoskeletal ultrasound: from bats and ships to babies and hips. Rheumatology (Oxford);43(7):931–3.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Aldrich JE. Basic physics of ultrasound imaging. Crit Care Med. 2007; 35(5 Suppl):131-7.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Feldman MK, Katyal S, Blackwood MS. US artifacts. Radiographics. 2009;29:1179–89.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Taljanovic MS, Melville D, Scalcione LR, Gimber L, Lorenz E, Witte R. Artefacts in musculoskeletal ultrasonography. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2014;18:3–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Nilsson A. Artefacts in sonography and Doppler. Eur Radiol. 2011;11:1308–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Holsbeeck MT, Introcaso JH. Musculoskeletal ultrasound, second edition. St Louis: Mosby; 2001. pp. 9–23.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Irsay L, Mandl P, Balint PV. Pitfalls in gray scale artifacts. In: Wakefield RJ, D’Agostino MA. Musculoskeletal ultrasound in rheumatology. Philadelphia: Saunders, Elsevier; 2010. pp. 29–40.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bianchi S, Martinoli C. Ultrasound of the musculoskeletal system. Berlin: Springer; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hagiandreou NJ. B mode ultrasound: basic concepts and new technology. Radiographics. 2003;23:1019–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Rutten GCM, Jagger G, Blickmann JG. US of the rotator cuff: pitfalls, limitations and artefacts. Radiographics. 2006;26:589–604.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Torp Pedersen ST, Terslev L. Settings and artefacts relevant in colour/power Doppler ultrasound in rheumatology. Ann Rheum Dis. 2008;67:143–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Joshua F. Ultrasound applications for the practicing rheumatologist. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2012;26:853–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anisotropy. Accessed 13 March 2015.

  15. Badea M, Dudea S. Ecografie generala-prelegeri pentru examenul de competenta. Ed. Universitara Iuliu hateganu Cluj Napoca; 1997. S. 5–29.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bushberg JT, Seibert JA, Leidholdt EM, Boone JM. The essential physics of medical imaging. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2002. pp. 469–553.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Zalud I, Rocha F. Artefacts, pitfalls and normal variants. Donald Sch Ultrasound Obstet Ginecol. 2012;6(1):1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Koski JM, Saarakkala S, Helle M, Hakulinen U, Heikkinen JO, Herminen H. Power Doppler ultrasonography and synovitis: correlating ultrasound imaging with histopathological findings and evaluating the performance of ultrasound equipment. Ann Rheumdis. 2006;65:1590–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Andersen M, Ellegard K, Hebsgaard JB, Christensen R, Torp-Pedersen S, Kvist PH, Soe N, Romer G, Vendel N, Bartels EM, Samsoe BD, Bliddal H. Ultrasound colour Doppler is associated with synovial pathology in biopsies from hand joints in rheumatoid arthritis patients: a cross sectional study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014;73:678–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Balint PV, Mandl P, Kane D. “All that glistens is not gold”- separating artefacts from true Doppler signals in rheumatological ultrasound. Ann Rheum Dis. 2008;67:141–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Semerano L, Gutierrez M, Falgarone G, Filippucci E, Guillot X, Boissier MC, Grassi W. Diurnal variation of Power Doppler in metacarpophalangeal joints of patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a preliminary study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011;70:1699–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. http://www.dermaviduals.de/english/publications/products/ultrasound-gels-effects-compositions-applications.html. Accessed 13 March 2015.

  23. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine (AIUM). Medical Ultrasound Safety. ISBN1–930047-71–1, 1994;reapproved 2002:1–40.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Schmidt WA, Schmidt H, Schicke B, Gromnica-Isle L. Standard reference values for musculoskeletal ultrasonography. Ann Rheumdis. 2004;63:988–94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Iagnocco A, Naredo E, Biljsma JWJ. Becoming a musculoskeletal ultrasonographer. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2013;27:271–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Gargani L. Lung ultrasound: a new tool for the cardiologist. Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2011;9(1):6.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Violeta Maria Vlad MD, PhD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Vlad, V. (2015). Pitfalls in Musculoskeletal Ultrasound. In: El Miedany, Y. (eds) Musculoskeletal Ultrasonography in Rheumatic Diseases. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15723-8_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15723-8_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-15722-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-15723-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics