Advertisement

Quantization of Electrical and Thermal Conductance in Nanostructures

Chapter
  • 1.4k Downloads

Abstract

This chapter opens with a presentation of the classical Drude theory of electrical conduction and a theory proposed by Landauer. Based on the assumption that electrical conduction can be modeled as transfer of electrons between two electron reservoirs, the Landauer theory proves to describe particularly well the electrical resistance in nanoscale conductors, i.e., in nanostructures. Surprisingly, this theory implies that the conductance (and resistance) of a nanostructure is independent of its material and temperature, and only depends on the dimensions of the sample, changing in a stepwise manner with a step of h/2e 2 representing the conductance quantum. The quantization of electrical and thermal conductance in nanostructures has been verified experimentally. Conductance quantization in nanostructures is used in the analysis of large-scale integration circuits, as required by the currently used 14 nm technology and future technologies.

Keywords

Free Path Conductive Material Giant Magnetoresistance Conductance Quantization Quantum Point Contact 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    N. Agrait, G. Rubio, S. Vieira, Plastic deformation of nanometer-scale gold connective necks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 3995–3998 (1995)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    J.L. Costa-Krämer et al., Nanowire formation in macroscopic metallic contacts: quantum mechanical conductance tapping a table top. Surf. Sci. 342, L1144–L1149 (1995)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    M.P. Das, F. Geen, Landauer formula without Landauer`s assumptions. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 14, L687 (2003)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    T.S. Fisher, Thermal Energy at the Nanoscale (World Scientific, New Jersey–London, 2014)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    J.K. Gimzewski, R. Möller, Transition from the tunneling regime to point contact studied using STM. Phys. Rev. B 36, 1284–1287 (1987)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    A. Greiner, L. Reggiani, T. Kuhn, L. Varani, Thermal conductivity and lorenz number for one-dimensional ballistic transport. Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 1114–1117 (1997)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    K. Hansen et al., Quantized conductance in relays. Phys. Rev. B 56, 2208–2220 (1997)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    H. Ibach, H. Lüth, Solid-State Physics. An Introduction to Principles of Materials Science (Springer, Heidelberg, 1995)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    A. Kamenec, W. Kohn, Landauer conductance without two chemical potentials. Phys. Rev. B 63, 155304 (2001)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    R. Landauer, Spatial variation of currents and fields due to localized scatters in metallic conduction. IBM J. Res. Dev. 1, 223–231 (1957)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    R. Landauer, Conductance determined by transmission: probes and quantised constriction resistance. J. Phys. Condens Matter 1, 8099–8110 (1989)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    C.J. Muller et al., Qunatization effects in the conductance of metallic contacts at room temperature. Phys. Rev. B 53, 1022–1025 (1996)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    W. Nawrocki, M. Wawrzyniak, J. Pajakowski, Transient states in electrical circuits with a nanowire. J. Nanosci Nanotechnol. 9, 1350–1353 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    F. Ott, J. Lunney, Quantum conduction: a step-by-step guide, Europhysics News. 29, January/February, 13–15 (1998)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    L.G.C. Rego, G. Kirczenow, Qunatized thermal conductance of dielectric quantum wire. Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 232–235 (1998)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    K. Schwab, E.A. Henriksen, J.M. Worlock, M.L. Roukes, Measurement of the quantum of thermal conductance. Nature 404, 974–977 (2000)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    The International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors. Internet site (2013)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    B.J. van Wees et al., Quantized conductance of point contacts in a two-dimensional electron gas. Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 848–850 (1988)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    B.J. van Wees et al., Quantum ballistic and adiabatic electron transport studied with quantum point contacts. Phys. Rev. B 43, 12431–12453 (1991)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    M. Wawrzyniak, Measurements of electric nanocontacts (in Polish). Serie: Dissertations, Publishing House of Poznan University of Technology (2012)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Electronics and TelecommunicationsPoznan University of TechnologyPoznanPoland

Personalised recommendations