Skip to main content

The Asset Management Process Reference Model for Infrastructures

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering ((LNME))

Abstract

Asset management is a concept that has a very wide range of use across industrial sectors and regions, often with different levels of maturity. Standards like PAS55-1 and its successor ISO 55001 have been developed as a form of guidance on what should be in place to qualify as an asset manager. However, those standards only prescribe what needs to be in place, not how these requirements should be fulfilled. In part, this is a good thing as the best approach to asset management varies amongst organizations. Yet, in implementing asset management many organizations struggle with the how. This is especially true for infrastructures, as the most difficult part of asset management is dealing with risk and risk is even more important for infrastructures than for other asset bases. The guidelines for application of the standards shed some light, but often not enough. A stronger guideline in the form of a reference model is needed. In this paper we describe a reference model for the asset management system that fulfills the requirement in an infrastructure context. This reference model is the result of some 15 years of developing and implementing asset management in a variety of infrastructures.

This chapter has been included as an additional chapter. The erratum to this chapter is availble at DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-15536-4_36

An erratum to this chapter can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15536-4_36

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The norm consists of 3 parts: the terminology (55000), the requirements (55001) and guidelines (55002). In general, when ISO 55000 is mentioned, reference is made to the series, not only to the terminology. In this paper, we try to be more precise.

  2. 2.

    The plural infrastructures is used here to indicate the different technological subsets that make up the total infrastructure of a society, like the road infrastructure, the electricity infrastructure and so on. These technological subsets are often managed by different organizations, and asset management is implemented per organization.

  3. 3.

    Though they could be owned by private companies, like the electricity and gas infrastructure assets in the Netherlands. The shareholders of these private companies are several local and provincial governments. Nevertheless, the accounting rules that apply are those of private companies. Ownership in this section is truly about the juristic ownership.

  4. 4.

    If, in this paper, performance of infrastructure assets is mentioned, the total effect of all incidents is meant.

  5. 5.

    However, this may be a special case for infrastructures, with their long lived assets in stable environments. Other asset management settings may be much more violent.

References

  1. Amadi-Echendu JE, Willett R, Brown K, Hope T, Lee J, Mathew J et al (2010) What is engineering asset management? In: Amadi-Echendu JE, Brown K, Willett R, Mathew J (eds) Definitions, concepts and scope of engineering asset management. Engineering asset management review, vol 1. Springer, London, pp 3–16

    Google Scholar 

  2. Aven T (2012) The risk concept—historical and recent development trends. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 3:99(0):33–44

    Google Scholar 

  3. BSI PAS55-1 Asset Management (2004) Part 1: Specification of the optimal management of physical infrastructure assets. London

    Google Scholar 

  4. BSI PAS 55-1:2008 Asset Management (2008) Part 1: Specification for the optimised management of physical assets

    Google Scholar 

  5. Burns P (2010) The history project 2010. https://www.amqi.com/index.php/historyproject. Accessed 24 June 2011

  6. Herder PM, Wijnia Y (2011) A systems view on infrastructure asset management. In: van der Lei T, Herder P, Wijnia Y (eds) Asset management: the state of Art in Europe from a life cycle perspective. Springer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  7. IAM. International Infrastructure Managament Manual (2002) V 2.0, UK 2002 ed: UK Institute of Asset Management

    Google Scholar 

  8. ISO (2009) ISO 31000: Risk Management-Principles and guidelines

    Google Scholar 

  9. ISO (2014) ISO 55000 Asset Management-Overview, principles and terminology. Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  10. ISO (2014) ISO 55001 Asset Management-Management systems-requirements. Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  11. ISO (2014) ISO 55002. Asset Management-Management systems-Guidelines for the application of ISO 55001. Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  12. ISO (2009) ISO Guide 73:2009. Risk management—Vocabulary. Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  13. ISO (2009) ISO/IEC 31010: Risk management: risk assessment techniques

    Google Scholar 

  14. Korn MS, Veldman E (2008) The benefits of continuous risk management. International conference on infrastructure systems: Building networks for a brighter future, Rotterdam

    Google Scholar 

  15. Krol J (2000) Power to the people [Master]. Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, Groningen

    Google Scholar 

  16. Leitch M (2010) ISO 31000:2009—The New International Standard on Risk Management. Risk Anal 30(6):887–892

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Morgan MG, Florig HK, Dekay ML, Fischbeck P (2000) Categorizing risk for risk ranking. Risk Anal 20(1):49–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. White EN (1975) Terotechnology (Physical Asset Management). Min Technol 57(658):5

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wijnia YC (2014) Tactical risk management (to be published). In: CESUN, 4th international engineering systems symposium. Hoboken, New Jersey, 8–11 June 2014

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wijnia YC, de Croon JAW, Lyanage JP (2011) Application of a unified reference model across asset types: comparative cases. In: The 6th World conference on engineering asset management Cincinnati

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wijnia YC, de Croon JAW, Lyanage JP (2011) Towards an asset management reference model: basis for a unified approach. In: The 6th World conference on engineering asset management Cincinnati

    Google Scholar 

  22. Wijnia YC, Korn MS, de Jager SY, Herder PM (eds) (2006) Long Term optimization of asset replacement in energy infrastructures. In: 2006 IEEE conference on systems, man, and cybernetics. Taipei, Taiwan

    Google Scholar 

  23. Woodhouse J (2008) Asset management: a science emerging 2008. http://www.twpl.co.uk/_assets/client/images/collateral/AM%20a%20science%20emerging%20paper.pdf. Accessed 5 Sept 2013

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ype Wijnia .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Wijnia, Y., de Croon, J. (2015). The Asset Management Process Reference Model for Infrastructures. In: Amadi-Echendu, J., Hoohlo, C., Mathew, J. (eds) 9th WCEAM Research Papers. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15536-4_35

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15536-4_35

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-15535-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-15536-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics